Concept Acquisition of Rotational Dynamics by Interactive Demonstration and Free-Body Diagram

Ogi Danika Pranata, Lia Yuliati, Dr. Wartono

Abstract


The concepts of force and motion are essential material in physics. However, students experience many difficulties in the concept of force in rotational dynamics. This research was conducted to measure students’ concept acquisition of the rotational dynamics through Interactive Demonstration assisted by Free-body diagram. The mixed research method was chosen through the use of test instruments in the forms of 10 multiple-choice with open ended questions. The subjects of the research were 35 students XI IPA Senior High School 2 Sungai Penuh-Indonesia. Students’ concept acquisition was measured before and after the intervention to be analyzed quantitatively. The obtained N-gain score was 0.47, and it showed that there was a moderate improvement in students’ concept acquisition, while the effect size value was 1.82 showing that the intervention strongly affected students’ concept aquisition. The data were also supported by the results of the qualitative analysis of the students’ answers and worksheets given during the intervention process.


Keywords


concept acquisition; free-body diagram; interactive demonstration; rotational dynamics

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ayesh, Qamhieh, N., Tit, N. & Abdelfattah, F. 2010. The Effect of Student Use of The Free-Body Diagram

Representation on Their Perfromance. Educational Research, 1 (10): 505-511.

Bakar, Z. A., Yun, L M., Keow, N. S. & Li, T. H. Goal-Setting Learning Princples: A Lesson from Practitioner. 2014. Journal of Education and Learning. 8(1): 41-50.

Carvalho, P. S. & Sousa, A. S. E. 2005. Rotation in Secandary School: Teaching the Effects of Frictional Force. Physics Education, 40 (3): 257-265.

Close, H. G., Gomez, L. S. & Heron, R. L. 2013. Student understanding of the application of Newton’s Second Law to Rotating Rigid Bodies. Physics Education Research Section, 81 (6): 458-470.

Cock, M. D. 2012. Representation Use and Strategy Choice in Physics Problem Solving.Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res, 8 (020117): 1-15.

Etkina, E., Heuvelen, A. V., White-Brahmia, S., Brookes, D. T., Gentile, M., Murthy, S., Rosengrant, D. & Warren, A. 2006. Scientific Abilities and Their Assessment.Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res, 2 (020103): 1-15.

Fredlund, T., Linder, C., Airey, J. & Linder, A. 2014. Unpacking Physics Representation: Towards an Appreciation of disciplinary affordance. Phys.Rev.ST Phys. Educ. Res, 10 (020129): 1-13.

Ibrahim, B. & Rebello, N. S. 2012. Representational Task Formats and Problem Solving Strategies in Kinematic and Work. Phys.Rev.ST Phys. Educ. Res, 8 (010126): 1-19.

Kinchin, J. 2012. Tracker Demonstrate Circular Motion. Physics Education. 47; 15-17

Kladivova, M. & Mucha, L. 2014. Physical Pendulum-A Simple Experiment Can Give Comprehensive Information About Rigid Body. European Journal of Physics, 35 (2014), 1-14.

Leyvraz, F. 2015. Understanding Rigid Body Motion in Arbitrary Dimensions. European Journal of Physics, 36 (3): 1-17.

Mashood, K. K. & Singh, V. A. 2015. Rotational kinematics of a Rigid Body About a Fixed Axis: Development and Analysis of an Inventory. European Journal of Physics, 36 (4): 1-20.

Mashood, K. K. & Singh, V. A. 2012. An Inventory of Rotational Kinematics of Particle: Unrevealing Misconceptions and Pitfalls in Reasoning. European Journal of Physics, 33 (5): 1301-1312

McCoy, B. L. 2012. Classroom Management to supprot Emerging Adolescents in Active Middle Schools Classrooms. Journal of Education and Learning 6(4): 201-206.

Merrill, D. M. (2013). First principles of instruction: Identifying and designing effective, efficient, andengaging instruction. San Francisco: Wiley

Miller, K. 2013. Use of Demonstration to teach, not just entertain. The physics Teacher. 51 (6): 570-571.

Morgan, G. A., Leech, N. L., Gloeckner, G. W. & Barret, K. C. 2004. SPSS for Introductory Statistics. Use and Interpretation. Second Edition. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Nachimuthu, K. & Vijayakumari, G. 2012. Perceptions on Multimedia Technology by Collage of Educational Teachers. Journal of Education and Learning. 6(3): 167-176.

Nieminen, P., Savinainen, A. & Viiri, J. 2012. Relations Between Representational Consistency, Conceptual Understanding of The Force Concept, and Scientific Reasoning. Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res, 8 (010123): 1-10.

Ortiz, L G., Heron, P. R., & Shaffer, P. S. 2005. Student Understanding of Static Equilibrium: Predicting and Accounting for Balancing. American Journal of Physics, 73 (6): 545-553.

Puri, Avinash. 1996. The Art of Freebody Diagrams. Physics Education. 31; 155.

Rimoldini, L. G. & Singh, C. 2005. Student Understanding of Rotational and Rolling Motion Concepts.Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res, 1 (010102): 1-9.

Robinson, S. J. 2014. Connecting the Mathematical and Conceptual Views of Angular Momentum. Physics Education, 49 (2): 144-148.

Rosengrant, D., Heuvelen, A.V. & Etkina, E. 2009. Do Students Use and Understand Free-Body Diagrams?. Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res, 5 (0101108): 1-3.

Sharma, D. M., Johnston D. I., Johnston H. Varvell, K., Robertson, G., Hopkins, A., Stewart, C., Cooper, I. &

Thornton, R. 2010. Use of interactive Lecture Demonstration: A Ten Year Study. Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 6 (020119): 1-9.

Steinberg, R., Cormier, S. & Fernandez, A. 2009. Probing Student Understanding of Scientific Tinking in the Context of Introductory Astrophysics.Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 5 (020104): 1-10.

Tanang, H., Djajadi, M., Abu, B. & Mokhtar, Mahani. 2014. Challanges of teaching Prefessionalism Development: A Case Study in Makassar, Indonesia. Journal of Education and Learning. 8(2): 132-143.

Wenning, C. J. 2011. The Levels of Inquiry Model of Science Teaching, Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online, 6 (2): 9-16, (http://www. business.illinoisstate.edu), 5 Januari 2016.