Pre-Service Teachers’ Skills in Analyzing the Mathematics Competency Based on Bloom Taxonomy

Authors

  • Vita Istihapsari Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
  • Afit Istiandaru Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
  • Siti Nur Rohmah Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12928/ijeme.v3i2.14549

Keywords:

Bloom taxonomy, Competence achievement indicator, Curriculum analysis, Junior high school, Pre-service teacher, Professional teacher, School mathematics.

Abstract

Professional teachers need to be skilled in planning their lesson. One of the activities to plan the lesson is analyzing the competence and teaching material demanded by the curriculum. This article aims to describe the Indonesian pre-service mathematics teachers’ skills in analyzing junior high school mathematics competence. The analysis is important to prepare the appropriate material for their students. This is qualitative research involving 26 pre-service teachers enrolled in the subject of Curriculum Analysis for Junior High School. First, they were assigned to analyze a given basic competence and were then challenged to select the appropriate materials and the indicators when the competence achieved according to Bloom taxonomy. Surprisingly, though there are many reference books available for sources of analysis, the teacher candidates found some difficulties in arranging the topics and composing the appropriate indicators. Some errors found such as the use of unmeasurable verbs, unclear activities, and illogical-irrelevant topics.

References

Clements, D. H., Swaminathan, S., Hannibal, M. A., & Sarama, J. (1999). Young children’s concepts of shape. J. Res. Math. Educ., 30, 192–212.

Courey, S. J., Tappe, P., Siker, J., & LePage, P. (2013). Improved lesson planning with universal design for learning (UDL). Teacher Education and Special Education, 36(1), 7-27.

Dave, R. H. (1975). Developing and Writing Behavioral Objectives, R. J. Amstrong, ed., California: Educational Innovators Press.

Dyer, J., Gregersen, H., Christensen, C.M. (2011). The innovators’ DNA: Mastering the Five Skills of Disruptive Innovators. Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing.

Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (2003). Designing and teaching courses to satisfy the ABET engineering criteria. Journal of Engineering Education, 92(1), 7-25.

Flevares, L. M., & Schiff, J. R. (2014). Learning mathematics in two dimensions: A review and look ahead at teaching and learning early childhood mathematics with children’s literature, Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 459.

Forehand, M. (2010). Bloom’s taxonomy. Emerging Perspectives on Learning, Teaching, and Technology, 41(4), 47-56.

Özgelen, S. (2012). Students’ science process skills within a cognitive domain framework. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 8(4), 283-292.

MOEC. (2016). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan RI nomor 24 tahun 2016 tentang Kompetensi Inti dan Kompetensi Dasar pada Jenjang Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Retrieved from: https://jdih.kemdikbud.go.id/arsip/Permendikbud_Tahun2016_Nomor024.zip.

Näsström, G. (2009). Interpretation of standards with Bloom’s revised taxonomy: a comparison of teachers and assessment experts. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 32(1), 39-51.

Netti, S. & Nusantara, T. (2016). The Failure to Construct Proof Based on Assimilation and Accommodation Framework from Piaget. International Education Studies, 9(12), 12-22.

Pujiono, S. (2014). Kesiapan Guru Bahasa Indonesia SMP dalam Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Litera, 13(2), 250-263.

Rahayu, G. D. S., & Firmansyah, D. (2019). Pengembangan pembelajaran inovatif berbasis pendampingan bagi guru sekolah dasar. Abdimas Siliwangi, 1(1), 17-25.

Sari, E. S. (2012). Online learning community: a case study of teacher professional development in Indonesia. Intercultural Education, 23(1), 63-72.

Taorina, R. M., Chandra, T. D., & Sisworo, S. (2018). Pengetahuan Calon Guru Matematika tentang Kurikulum 2013 dalam Penyusunan RPP. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 3(12), 1520-1529.

Thair, M., & Treagust, D. F. (2003). A brief history of a science teacher professional development initiative in Indonesia and the implications for centralised teacher development. International Journal of Educational Development, 23(2), 201-213.

Thompson, T. (2008). Mathematics teachers’ interpretation of higher-order thinking in Bloom’s taxonomy. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 3(2), 96-109.

Wilcox, R. (2017). Modern statistics for the social and behavioral sciences: A practical introduction. London: Chapman and Hall/CRC.

Zazkis, R., Liljedahl, P., & Sinclair, N. (2009). Lesson plays: Planning teaching versus teaching planning. For the Learning of Mathematics, 29(1), 40-47.

Downloads

Published

2019-09-01

How to Cite

Istihapsari, V., Istiandaru, A., & Rohmah, S. N. (2019). Pre-Service Teachers’ Skills in Analyzing the Mathematics Competency Based on Bloom Taxonomy. International Journal on Emerging Mathematics Education, 3(2), 117–128. https://doi.org/10.12928/ijeme.v3i2.14549