Rasch Model Study on Mathematics Examination Test Using Item Response Theory Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12928/ijeme.v6i1.21761Keywords:
Final Exam Test, Item Response Theory, Rasch ModelAbstract
This study was conducted to analyze the test instrument used to measure the ability of students in the odd final exam in mathematics. Sampling using purposive sampling technique. These students consist of 398 students. The questions given are in the form of multiple-choice questions with a total of 40 items. The data analysis technique used quantitative descriptive analysis. Data analysis was carried out using the Item Response Theory (IRT) Rasch model approach with the help of QUEST software. The results of the analysis show, from 40 items there are 39 items fit with the Rasch model. Judging from the level of difficulty, items with very difficult categories are 0%, difficult categories are 8 items or 21%, moderate item categories are 23 items or 59%, easy categories are 8 items or 21%, and very easy categories are 0 %. The reliability of the estimatedvalue of the item is 0.95 with a very good category so that it affects the items that fit the model. Thehigher reliability, the more items that fit the model. The reliability of the case estimate value is 0.00with a weak category. This value indicates an inconsistency in the answers of the test takers, whichmeans that the test takers are careless in answering the questions, thus affecting the reliability ofthe questions.
References
Abdullah, H., Arsad, N., Hashim, F. H., Aziz, N. A., Amin, N., & Ali, S. H. (2012). Evaluation of Students’ Achievement in the Final Exam Questions for Microelectronic (KKKL3054) using the Rasch Model. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 60(c), 119–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.356
Alkharusi, H. (2015). An evaluation of the measurement of perceived classroom assessment environment. International Journal of Instruction, 8(2), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2015.824a
Anwar, M. S., Choirudin, C., Ningsih, E. F., Dewi, T., & Maseleno, A. (2019). Developing an Interactive Mathematics Multimedia Learning Based on Ispring Presenter in Increasing Students Interest in Learning Mathematics. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(1), 135–150. https://doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v10i1.4445
Ardiyanti, D. (2016). Aplikasi Model Rasch pada Pengembangan Skala Efikasi Diri dalam Pengambilan Keputusan Karir Siswa. Jurnal Psikologi, 43(3), 248–263.
Aricak, O. T., Avcu, A., Topcu, F., & Tutlu, M. G. (2020). Use of Item Response Theory to Validate Cyberbullying Sensibility Scale for University Students. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 7(1), 18–29. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.629584
Camminatiello, I., Gallo, M., & Menini, T. (2010). The Rasch Model for Evaluating Italian Student Performance. Journal of Applied Quantitative Methods, 5(2), 331–349.
Clark, I. (2012). Formative Assessment: Assessment Is for Self-regulated Learning. JSTOR, 24(2), 205–249. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10648-01
Djemari, M. (2012). Pengukran Penilaian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan. Nuha Medika.
Fitriani, L., Ramalis, T. R., & Efendi, R. (2019). Karakterisasi Tes Keterampilan Proses Sains Materi Fluida Statis Berdasarkan Teori Respon Butir. Omega: Jurnal Fisika dan Pendidikan Fisika, 5(2), 27. https://doi.org/10.31758/omegajphysphyseduc.v5i2.27
Gipps, C., Hargreaves, E., & McCallum, B. (2015). What makes a good primary school teacher? Expert classroom strategies. Routledge.
Griffrin, P., & McGaw, B. (2014). Assesment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills. In Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2324-5_2
Hayati, S., & Lailatussaadah, L. (2016). Validitas Dan Reliabilitas Instrumen Pengetahuan Pembelajaran Aktif, Kreatif Dan Menyenangkan (Pakem) Menggunakan Model Rasch. Jurnal Ilmiah Didaktika, 16(2), 169. https://doi.org/10.22373/jid.v16i2.593
Imaroh, N., Susongko, P., & Isnani. (2017). Uji Validitas Tes Ulangan Akhir Semester Gasal Mata Pelajaran Matematika. E-Journal UPS, 1(1), 80–89.
Kadir, A. (2015). Menyusun dan Menganalisis Tes Hasil Belajar. Al-Ta’dib, 8(2), 70–81.
Kartianom, K., & Ndayizeye, O. (2017). What ‘s wrong with the Asian and African Students’ mathematics learning achievement? The multilevel PISA 2015 data analysis for Indonesia, Japan, and Algeria. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2), 200. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v4i2.16931
Kartianom, & Mardapi, D. (2017). The utilization of junior high school mathematics national examination data: A conceptual error diagnosis. REiD (Research and Evaluation in Education), 3(2), 163–173. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_AJSLP-17-0074
Marjiastuti, K., & Wahyuni, S. (2014). Analisis kemampuan peserta didik dengan model Rasch. In Seminar Nasional Evaluasi Pendidikan II.
Naqiyah, M., Rosana, D., Sukardiyono, & Ernasari. (2020). Developing Instruments to Measure Physics Problem Solving Ability and Nationalism of High School Student. 13(4), 921–936.
OECD. (2005). Formative Assessment: Improving Learning in Secondary Classrooms. 29(November), 282. http://new.sourceoecd.org/9264007393
Pey Tee, O., & Subramaniam, R. (2018). Comparative study of middle school students’ attitudes towards science: Rasch analysis of entire TIMSS 2011 attitudinal data for England, Singapore and the U.S.A. as well as psychometric properties of attitudes scale. International Journal of Science Education, 40(3), 268–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1413717
Pratama, D. (2020). Analisis Kualitas Tes Buatan Guru Melalui Pendekatan Item Response Theory (IRT) Model Rasch. Tarbawy: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 7(1), 61–70. https://doi.org/10.32923/tarbawy.v7i1.1187
Primi, C., Morsanyi, K., Chiesi, F., Donati, M. A., & Hamilton, J. (2016). The Development and Testing of a New Version of the Cognitive Reflection Test Applying Item Response Theory (IRT). Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 29(5), 453–469. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1883
Purwanto. (2009). Evaluasi Hasil Belajar. Pustaka Pelajar.
Rahayuningsih, S., & Jayanti, R. (2019). High Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Students In Solving Group Problem Based Gender. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(2), 243–250. https://doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v10i2.4872
Retnawati, H. (2014). Teori respons butir dan penerapannya: Untuk peneliti, praktisi pengukuran dan pengujian, mahasiswa pascasarjana. Nuha Mediak.
Retnawati, H., & Hadi, S. (2014). Sistem bank soal daerah terkalibrasi untuk menyongsong era desentralisasi. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 20(2), 183–193.
Retnawati, H., Hadi, S., & Nugraha, A. C. (2016). Vocational high school teachers’ difficulties in implementing the assessment in curriculum 2013 in Yogyakarta Province of Indonesia. International Journal of Instruction, 9(1), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2016.914a
Rindermann, H., & Baumeister, A. E. E. (2015). Validating the Interpretations of PISA and TIMSS Tasks: A Rating Study. International Journal of Testing, 15(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/15305058.2014.966911
Safihin, M. (2019). Pengembangan Tes Menggunakan Model Rasch Materi Gaya Untuk SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 8(6), 1–11. http://jurnal.untan.ac.id/index.php/jpdpb/article/view/33424/75676581548
Santoso, A., Kartianom, K., & Kassymova, G. K. (2019). Kualitas butir bank soal statistika (Studi kasus: Instrumen ujian akhir mata kuliah statistika Universitas Terbuka). Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2), 165–176. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v6i2.28900
Shute, V. J., & Becker, B. J. (2010). Innovative Assessment for the 21st Century. Innovative Assessment for the 21st Century. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6530-1
Siti Aminah, N. (2013). Jurnal Materi dan Pembelajaran Fisika (JMPF). Jurnal Materi dan Pembelajaran Fisika (JMPF), 3(2), 33–39.
Sumintono, B. (2014). Model Rasch untuk Penelitian Sosial Kuantitatif. Institut Teknologi Sepuluh November (Nomor November 201). http://deceng3.wordpress.com
Susanto, H., Rinaldi, A., & Novalia. (2015). Analisis Validitas Reabilitas Tingkat Kesukaran dan Daya Beda pada Butir Soal Ujian Akhir Semester Ganjil Mata Pelajaran Matematika. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2), 203–217. https://doi.org/10.18907/jjsre.37.3_343_4
Susdelina, Perdana, S. A., & Febrian. (2018). Analisis Kualitas Instrumen Pengukuran Pemahaman Konsep Persamaan Kuadrat Melalui Teori Tes Klasik Dan Rasch Model. Jurnal Kiprah, 6(1), 41–48. https://doi.org/10.31629/kiprah.v6i1.574
Tri Wahyuningsih, E. (2015). Analisis Butir Soal Tes Objektif Buatan Guru Ulangan Semester Ganjil Mata Pelajaran Ekonomi Kelas X di Sma Negeri 1 Mlati Tahun Ajaran 2013/2014. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Wafubwa, R. N., & Csíkos, C. (2020). Formative Assessment as a Predictor of Mathematics Teachers’ Levels of Metacognitive Regulation. International Journal of Instruction, 14(1), 983–998. https://doi.org/10.29333/IJI.2021.14158A
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
License and Copyright Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal. Please also carefully read the International Journal on Emerging Mathematics Education (IJEME) Author Guidelines at http://journal.uad.ac.id/index.php/IJEME/about/submissions#authorGuidelines
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities, tacitly or explicitly, of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with the International Journal on Emerging Mathematics Education (IJEME) agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.
