Learning Direct and Inverse Proportion Using Musi Tour

Authors

  • Nursa Fatri Nofriati Universitas Sriwijaya, Palembang
  • Yusuf Hartono Universitas Sriwijaya, Palembang
  • Somakim Somakim Universitas Sriwijaya, Palembang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12928/ijeme.v3i2.13578

Keywords:

direct and inverse proportion, musi tour, ratio table, design research, PMRI

Abstract

This study used design research to produce learning trajectory through Musi Tour context which can help students in understanding the concept of direct and inverse proportion. This study used PMRI approach. The object of this study was the seventh grade students of SMP Nurul Qomar Palembang. Data for retrospective analysis was collected from teaching experiment in the form of students’ work results, field notes, and students’ interview. The results obtained in this study were learning trajectory which consisted of 3 activities: 1) students were given contextual problems namely Musi Tour as the starting point in learning direct and inverse proportion. 2) through students' understanding of the ratio table in the Musi Tour context, students can understand the direct proportion. 3) students can model and understand the concept of inverse proportion and solve the problems by using Ratio table. The results showed that the use of Musi tour context can help students in understanding the concept of direct and inverse proportion.

References

Andinasari. (2016). Penggunaan Video Pesawat Take off pada Materi Perbandingan Berbalik Nilai melalui Pendekatan Matematika Realistik Indonesia. Prosiding Seminar Pendidikan Nasional,Palembang,1(1),92-104.

Bustang, et al., (2013). Developing a local instruction theory for learning the concept of angle through visual field activities and spatial representations. International Education Studies, 6, 58-69.

Carpenter, T. P., Franke, M. L., Jacobs, V. R., Fennema, E., & Empson, S. B. (1998).A longitudinal study of invention and understanding in children’s multidigit addition andsubtraction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29(1), 3–20.

Cramer, K., Post, T., & Currier, S. (1993). Learning and Teaching Ratio and Proportion : Research Implications. InD Owens(Ed). Research Ideas For The Classroom (pp.159-178). NY: Macmillan Publishing Company.

Gravemeijer, K. (1994). Developing realistic mathematics education.Utrecht: Teehnipress, Culemborg.

Gravemeijer, K,., & Van Eerde, D. (2009). Research as a Means for Building a Knowledge Base for Teaching in Mathematics Educations. The Elementary School Journal,109(5),510-524.

Kaput, J., & West, M. M. (1994). Missing-value proprotional reasoning problems:Factorsaffecting informal reasoning patterns. In G. Harel & J. Confrey (Eds.), The development ofmultiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics (pp. 237–292). New York:State University of New York press.

Lamon, S. J. (2006). Teaching Fractions and Ratios for Understanding : Essential Content Knowledge and Instructional Strategies for Teachers 2nd Ed. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Lange, Jan de.. (1998). Assessment: No Change Without Problems. Netherlands: Freudenthal Institute.

Lange, Jan de. (1987). Mathematics, insight and meaning. Utrecht: OW & OC, Rijksuniversiteit Utrecht.

Norton, S. J. (2005). The Construction of Proportional Reasoning. Proceedi-ngs of the 29th Conference of the International Group for the Psy-chology of Mathematics Education, Melbourne, 4, 17-24.

OECD. (2009). Learning mathematics for life. A view perspective from PISA. Paris: OECD.

Pitadjeng. (2015). Pembelajaran Matematika yang Menyenangkan. Yogyakarta : Graha Ilmu.

Raharjanti, M., Nusantara, T., & Mulyati., S., (2016). Kesalahan siswa dalam menyelesaikan permasalahan per-bandingan senilai dan berbalik ni-lai. Prosiding KNPMP1 Surakarta, 312-319.

Rahmawati. (2015). Desain Pembelajaran Perbandingan dengan Mengguna-kan Kertas Berpetak di Kelas VII. Thesis. Palembang: Magister Pendidikan matematika FKIP Universitas Sriwijaya.

Ruiz, E. F. & Lupianez, J. L.. 2009. Detecting Psychological Obstacles to Teaching and Learning The Topics of Ratio and Proportion in Sixth Grade Primary Pupils. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology (EJREP), 7(17),397-424.

Streefland, L. (1985). Search for the roots of ratio: some thoughts on the long term learning process (towards.. a theory). Educational Studies in Mathematics, 16, 75-94.

Suherman, E., Turmudi., & Suhendra. (2003). Common Textbook: Strategi Pembelajaran Matematika Kontemporer. Bandung: JICA-Universitas Pendidikan Matematika (UPI).

Sumarto, N. (2013). Design Research On Mathematics Education: Ratio Table In Developing The Students’ Proporsional Reasoning. Palembang : Sekolah Pasca Sarjana Universitas Sriwijaya.

Utari, R. S., Putri, R.I.I, Hartono, Y. (2015). Konteks kebudayaan Palembang untuk mendukung kemampuan bernalar siswa SMP pada materi perbandingan. Jurnal Didaktik Matematika. 2(2). 27-37.

Van den Heuvel – Panhuizen, M. (1996). Assessment and realistic mathematics education. Utrecht : CD β Press/ Freudenthal Institude.

Van De Walle, J.A (2007). Matematika Sekolah Dasar dan Menengah: Pengembangan Pengajaran Jilid Pertama. Suyono. Jakarta: Erlangga. (2008).

Zulkardi. (2002). Developing a learning environment on realistic mathematics education for Indonesia students teacher. Thesis University of Twente. Netherlands: Print Patners Ipskamp-Enschede.

Zulkardi & Putri, R.I.I. (2006). Mendesain sendiri soal kontekstual matematika. Prosiding KNM 13, Semarang, 1-7.

Downloads

Published

2020-04-20

How to Cite

Nofriati, N. F., Hartono, Y., & Somakim, S. (2020). Learning Direct and Inverse Proportion Using Musi Tour. International Journal on Emerging Mathematics Education, 3(2), 139–151. https://doi.org/10.12928/ijeme.v3i2.13578

Issue

IJEME, Vol. 3 No. 2, September 2019

Section

Articles

License

License and Copyright Agreement

In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:

  • They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  • The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal. Please also carefully read the International Journal on Emerging Mathematics Education (IJEME) Author Guidelines at http://journal.uad.ac.id/index.php/IJEME/about/submissions#authorGuidelines
  • That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  • That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities, tacitly or explicitly, of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  • They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  • They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.

Copyright

Authors who publish with the International Journal on Emerging Mathematics Education (IJEME) agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

 


Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.