Effect of Computer-Based Software Package on Students’ Achievement in Graphical Concepts in Mathematics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12928/ijeme.v2i2.8680Keywords:
computer-based software program package, regular users of computer, irregular users of computer, achievement in graphical concepts in mathematicsAbstract
This study determined the effects of the Computer Based Software Program Package (CBSPP) for Regular Users of Computer (RUC) and Irregular Users of Computer (IUC) on students’ achievement in graphical concepts in mathematics. It also examined the moderating effects of computer self-efficacy and gender. Skinner’s behaviorist theory provided the framework, while the pretest-posttest control group quasi-experimental design with  factorial matrix was adopted. Two hundred and ninety-six senior secondary II (SS II) students were purposively selected from six schools in Ogba (3), Egbema (2) and Ndoni (1) Local Government Area of Rivers State, Nigeria based on the availability of the computer. Two whole classes each of SS II totaling 97students were randomly assigned to the RUC and given laptop computers to use for the period of the experiment, IUC (99 students) and control group (100 students). Instruments used were: achievement test on the graphical concept () and computer self-efficacy () scales. Instructional guides were also used. Data were analyzed using analysis of covariance and Scheffe post-hoc test at = 0.05. There were significant main effects of treatment on achievement. There were significant main effects of computer self-efficacy on students’ achievement and gender on achievement. There were significant two-way interaction effects of treatment and computer self-efficacy, treatment and gender, computer self-efficacy and gender on students’ achievement. There were significant three-way interaction effects of treatment, gender and computer self-efficacy on students’ achievement in favor of the RUC.References
Abubakar, R. B., & Oguguo, O. D. (2011). Age and Gender as Predictors of Academic Achievement of College Mathematics and Science Students. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 1(2), 89-93.
Afzal, M., Gondal, B., & Fatima, N. (2014). The Effect of Computer Based Instructional Technique for the Learning of Elementary Level Mathematics among High, Average, and Low Achievers. International Journal of Education and Development using ICT, 10(4), 47-59.
Akinsola, M. K., & Odeyemi, E. O. (2014). Effects of Mnemonic and Prior Knowledge Instructional Strategies on Students’ Achievement in Mathematics. International Journal of Education and Research, 2(7), 675-688.
Aoyama, K. (2007). Investigating a Hierarchy of Students’ Interpretations of Graphs. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 2(3), 298-318.
Areelu, F., & Akinsola, M. K. (2014). Influence of Tiered Lesson and Group Personalization Instructional Strategies on Senior Secondary Students’ Achievement in Mathematics. European Scientific Journal, 10(16), 474-497.
Asikhia, O. A. (2010). Students and Teachers’ Perception of the Causes of Poor Academic Performance in Ogun State Secondary Schools [Nigeria]: Implications for Counseling for National Development. European Journal of Social Sciences, 13(2), 229-242.
Berg, C. A., & Smith, P. (1994). Assessing Students' Abilities to Construct and Interpret Line Graphs: Disparities Between Multipleâ€Choice and Freeâ€Response Instruments. Science Education, 78(6), 527-554.
Else-Quest, N. M., Hyde, J. S., & Linn, M. C. (2010). Cross-National Patterns of Gender Differences in Mathematics: A Meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136(1), 103-127.
Ersoy, M., & Akbulut, Y. (2014). Cognitive and Affective Implications of Persuasive Technology Use on Mathematics Instruction. Computers & Education, 75, 253-262.
Fallan, L., & Opstad, L. (2016). Student Self-Efficacy and Gender-Personality Interactions. International Journal of Higher Education, 5(3), 32-44.
Faulkner, L. R. (2008). Foundations for Success: National Mathematics Advisory Panel (Final Report Briefing). Washington, DC: US Department of Education.
Gambari, I. A., Ezenwa, V. I., & Anyanwu, R. C. (2014). Comparative Effects of Two Modes of Computer-Assisted Instructional Package on Solid Geometry Achievement. Contemporary Educational Technology, 5(2), 110-120.
Hooper, S., & Rieber, L. P. (1995). Teaching with Technology. In A. C. Ornstein (Ed)., Teaching: Theory into Practice (pp. 154-170). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Isman, A. (2011). Instructional Design in Education: New Model. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 10(1), 136-142.
Kara, Y., & Yesilyurt, S. (2007). Assessing the Effects of Tutorial and Edutainment Software Programs on Students' Achievements, Misconceptions and Attitudes towards Biology. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 8(2), 1-22.
Kausar, T., Choudhry, B. N., & Gujjar, A. A. (2008). A Comparative Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Computer Assisted Instruction (CAI) versus Class Room Lecture (CRL) for Computer Science at ICS Level. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 7(4), 19-28.
Knuth, E. J. (2000). Understanding Connections between Equations and Graphs. The Mathematics Teacher, 93(1), 48-53.
Konold, C., & Higgins, T. (2003). Reasoning about Data. In J. Kilpatrick, W. Martins, & D. Schifter (Eds.), A Research Companion to Principles and Standard for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Oludipe, D. L. (2012). Gender Difference in Nigerian Junior Secondary Students’ Academic Achievement in Basic Science. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 2(1), 93-99.
Parmar, R. S., & Signer, B. R. (2005). Sources of Error in Constructing and Interpreting Graphs: A Study of Fourth-and Fifth-grade Students with LD. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(3), 250-261.
Ragasa, C. Y. (2008). A Comparison of Computer-Assisted Instruction and the Traditional Method of Teaching Basic Statistics. Journal of Statistics Education, 16(1).
Reyna, V. F., & Brainerd, C. J. (2007). The Importance of Mathematics in Health and Human Judgment: Numeracy, Risk Communication, and Medical Decision Making. Learning and Individual Differences, 17(2), 147-159.
Roth, W. M., & McGinn, M. K. (1997). Graphing: Cognitive Ability or Practice?. Science Education, 81(1), 91-106.
Tella, A. (2007). The Impact of Motivation on Student’s Academic Achievement and Learning Outcomes in Mathematics Among Secondary School Students in Nigeria. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(2), 149-156.
Udousoro, U. J. (2011). The Effects of Gender and Mathematics Ability on Academic Performance of Students in Chemistry. African Research Review, 5(4), 201-213.
Vernadakis, N., Avgerinos, A., Tsitskari, E., & Zachopoulou, E. (2005). The Use of Computer Assisted Instruction in Preschool Education: Making Teaching Meaningful. Early Childhood Education Journal, 33(2), 99-104.
WAEC. (2013). Resume from the Mathematics. West African Examination Council Chief Examiners’ Report. Lagos: West African Examination Council.
WAEC. (2014). Resume of All the Report from the Mathematics and Applied Science Sector. West African Examination Council Chief Examiners’ Report. Lagos: West African Examination Council.
WAEC. (2016). Resume of Mathematics. West African Examination Council Chief Examiners’ Report. Lagos: West African Examination Council.
WAEC. (2017). General Resume. West African Examination Council Chief Examiners’ Report. Lagos: West African Examination Council.
Williams, D. A., & Leader, L. (2006). Graphing Calculators and Their Effect on Students' Understanding of Functions. Dissertation. Valdosta: Valdosta State University.
Yesilyurt, M. (2010). Meta Analysis of the Computer Assisted Studies in Science and Mathematics: A Sample of Turkey. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 9(1), 123-131.
Yusuf, M. O., & Afolabi, A. O. (2010). Effects of Computer Assisted Instruction (CAI) on Secondary School Students' Performance in Biology. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 9(1), 62-69.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
License and Copyright Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal. Please also carefully read the International Journal on Emerging Mathematics Education (IJEME) Author Guidelines at http://journal.uad.ac.id/index.php/IJEME/about/submissions#authorGuidelines
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities, tacitly or explicitly, of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with the International Journal on Emerging Mathematics Education (IJEME) agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.
