Software-Based Circle Technology in Dinagat Geometry Class: A Single Subject Research

Authors

  • Jonas Villegas Cuevas Llamera National High School, Llamera, Libjo, Dinagat Islands
  • Irmalyn Borja Paymalan Surigao State College of Technology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12928/ijeme.v5i2.20055

Keywords:

Circle, Discriminant analysis, Single subject research, Software-based instruction technology.

Abstract

Present study investigated the effectiveness of the use of technology software-based instruction in learning Circle Geometry, the extent of the students' interest on the use of this strategy, and designs a classification model through Discriminant Analysis forcasting students' performance as to having mastered or not the lessons based on their interest on the use of the strategy. The study utilized single subject research design to the thirty-one Grade 10 students in Llamera National High School, Dinagat Islands Division. Trend analysis and repeated ANOVA results revealed that most students' performance in circle geometry improved throughout the intervention of technology software-based instruction and the gap between the high achieving and low achieving students was reduced. Students also perceived high interest in learning geometry through the intervention. Indeed, technology software-based instruction recuperates knowledge in Circle Geometry. Accordingly, the capability to visualize the lesson through the software-based instruction is the best predictor of the students' mastery in circle geometry.

Author Biographies

Jonas Villegas Cuevas, Llamera National High School, Llamera, Libjo, Dinagat Islands

Teacher II

Irmalyn Borja Paymalan, Surigao State College of Technology

Instructor I

Mathematics Department

College of Arts and Sciences

References

Alegria, M. (2017). Music as a Teaching Tool. George Lucas Educational Foundation. Retrieved from: http://benefits-of-using-music-in-the-classroom/.

Alkhateeb, M. A., & Al-Duwairi, A. M. (2019). The Effect of Using Mobile Applications (GeoGebra and Sketchpad) on the Students’ Achievement. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(3), 523-533.

Chen, R. W., & Chan, K. K. (2019). Using augmented reality flashcards to learn vocabulary in early childhood education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(7), 1812-1831.

Department of Education. (2016). K to 12 Curriculum Guide in Mathematics. DepEd Complex, Pasig City. Retrieved from: http://lrmds.deped.gov.ph.

Ferron, J., & Rendina-Gobioff, G. (2014). Interrupted Time Series Design. Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online, 1-6.

Flemmer, C. (2009). Technology’s Influence on Student Centered Learning Environments. Boise State University. Retrieved from: https://sites.google.com/a/boisestate.edu/edtech504/Iflemmer.

Greefrath, G., Hertleif, C., & Siller, HS. (2018). Mathematical modelling with digital tools—a quantitative study on mathematising with dynamic geometry software. ZDM, 50, 233–244.

Gonzalez, G. & DeJarnette, A. (2013). Geometric Reasoning about a Circle Problem. The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc. 16 (8).

Hanna, E. (2018). Using geogebra to explore properties of circles in euclidean geometry. Masters Essays. 104. https://collected.jcu.edu/mastersessays/104.

Harackiewicz, J. M., Smith, J. L., & Priniski, S. J. (2016). Interest matters: The Importance of Promoting Interest in Education. Policy Insights Behav Brain Sci., 3(2), 220-227.

Heick, T. (2019). The Assimilation vs Accomodation of Knowledge. Teachthought: We Grow Teachers. Retrieved from https://www.teachthought.com/learning/assimilation-vs-accommodation-of-knowledge

Hitchcock, J. (2012). Single Case Design Brief. Design Options for Home Visiting Evaluation 4th Edition (pp. 1-9). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.

Hursen, C. & Ertac, G. (2015). K 12 Students’ Attitudes towards Using Constructivism in History Lessons. Global Conference on Contemporary Issues in Education 2015, pp. 475-480.

McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. C. (2014). Educational design research. In Spector J., Merrill M., Elen J., Bishop M. (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology (pp. 131-140). New York: Springer.

Ogbonnaya, U. & Alfred, C. (2017). The Impact of Using Geogebra to Teach Circle Geometry on Grade 11 Students’ Achievement. Institute of Science and Technology Education, University of South Africa.

Ramayah, T., Ahmad, N.H., Halim, H.A., Mohamed Zainal, S.R. (2010). Discriminant analysis: An illustrated example. African Journal of Business Management, 4(9), 1654-1667.

Romine, W., Sadler, T. D., Presley, M., & Klosterman, M. L. (2013). Student Interest in Technology and Science (SITS) Survey: Development, Validation, and Use of a New Instrument. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(2), 261-283.

Siegle, D. (2015). Single-Subject Research. EPSY 5601. Retrieved from: www.delsiegle.info.

Shadaan, P. & Leong, K. E. (2013). Effectiveness of Using Geogebra on Students’ Understanding in Learning Circles. The Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 1(4), 43374506.

Stevens, J. P. (2002). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences, fourth edition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Schulte, P. L. (1996). A Definition of Constructivism. Science Scope, 20(6), 25-27.

Tay, M. K., & Mensah-Wonskyi, T. (2018). Effect of using Geogebra on senior high school students’ performance in circle theorems. African Journal of Educational Studies in mathematics and Sciences, 14, 1-18.

Downloads

Published

2021-09-30

How to Cite

Cuevas, J. V., & Paymalan, I. B. (2021). Software-Based Circle Technology in Dinagat Geometry Class: A Single Subject Research. International Journal on Emerging Mathematics Education, 5(2), 125–138. https://doi.org/10.12928/ijeme.v5i2.20055

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.