Creative Thinking Process Based on Wallas Model in Solving Mathematics Problem

Authors

  • Hevy Risqi Maharani Sultan Agung Islamic University, Semarang, Indonesia
  • Sukestiyarno Sukestiyarno Semarang State University, Semarang, Indonesia
  • Budi Waluya Semarang State University, Semarang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12928/ijeme.v1i2.5783

Keywords:

creative thinking process, mathematics problem, Wallas model

Abstract

It’s difficult for junior high school’s teacher to get position and foster their students who’re still in transition in creative thinking. This study evaluated creative thinking process based on a model of Wallas (2014). Subjects were categorized into upper, middle, and low category after doing creative thinking ability test. The variable is an existence of junior high school’s students in solving a mathematics problem. Data were analyzed through classification, data representation, and conclusions. The results showed 1) 23,33% of students only reached preparation stage, called low category, 2) 60% of students reached illumination stage though students take a long time, called middle category, and 3) 16,67% of students have completed up to verification stage, called upper category. By deepening triangulation interview, right students in that category. Students in low and middle category still need assistance when experiencing obstacle in the creative thinking process, while upper category needs of enrichment materials.

References

Aldous, C.R. (2007). Creativity, problem solving and innovative science: Insights from history, cognitive psychology and neuroscience. International Education Journal, 8(2), 176-186.

Bloom. B.S., et al. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Goals. Canada: David McKay Company, Inc.

Bonaci, C.G., Mustata, R.V. & Lenciu, A. (2013). Revisiting bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. The Macrotheme Review, 2(2), 1-9.

Huitt, W. (2011). Bloom et al.'s Taxonomy of the Cognitive Domain. Educational Psychology Interactive. Valdosta, GA: Valdosta State University.

IACBE. (2014). Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives and Writing Intended Learning Outcomes Statements. USA: The International Assembly for Collegiate Business Education.

Krathwohl, D.R. (2002). A revision of Bloom's Taxonomy: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 212-218.

Kwon, O.N., Park, J.S., & Park, J.H. (2006). Cultivating divergent thinking in mathematics through an open-ended approach. Asia Pacific Education Review, 7(1), 51-61.

Maharani, H.R., & Sukestiyarno. (2015). Learning analysis based on humanism theory and mathematics creative thinking ability of students. International Journal of Education and Psychology, 1(2), 11-18.

Pehkonen, E. (1997). The state-of-art in mathematical creativity. ZDM, 29(3), 63-67.

Potur, A.A., & Barkul, O. (2009). Gender and creative thinking in education: A theoretical and experimental overview. Journal of ITU A| Z, 6(2), 44-57.

Runisah, Herman, T., & Dahlan, J.A. (2017). Using the 5E learning cycle with metacognitive technique to enhance students’mathematical critical thinking skills. International Journal on Emerging Mathematics Education, 1(1), 87-98.

Sari, E.P. & Sukestiyarno. (2014). Pemanfaatan media lingkungan dalam pembentukan karakter kemandirian siswa pada pembelajaran matematika model PBL pendekatan konstruktivisme. Proceedings of the National Conferenfe on Conservation for Better Life (NCCBL), Semarang State University, pp. 350-357.

Wallas, G. (2014). The Art of Thought. England:Solis Press.

Wessels, H. (2014). Levels of mathematical creativity in model-eliciting activities. Journal of Mathematical Modelling and Application, 1(9), 22-40.

Widiastuti, M.M.H., & Sukestiyarno. (2014). Pemanfaatan lingkungan sekolah guna menunjang pembelajaran matematika dengan model cycle 7E dalam rangka membentuk karakter rasa ingin tahu siswa dan pemecahan masalah. Proceedings of the National Conferenfe on Conservation for Better Life (NCCBL), Semarang State University, pp. 331-338.

Wulandari & Sukestiyarno. (2015). Development of ATONG based reference module for school geometry subject and analysis of mathematical creative thinking skills. Paper of the International Conference on Mathematics, Science, and Education (ICMSE), Semarang State University.

Downloads

Published

2017-08-09

How to Cite

Maharani, H. R., Sukestiyarno, S., & Waluya, B. (2017). Creative Thinking Process Based on Wallas Model in Solving Mathematics Problem. International Journal on Emerging Mathematics Education, 1(2), 177–184. https://doi.org/10.12928/ijeme.v1i2.5783