Technology Integration in Mathematics Education: Examining the Quality of Meta-Analytic Research

Jamaal Rashad Young

Abstract


The aim of this study was to evaluate the methodological quality of meta-analyses in mathematics education research. Computerized searches were conducted in ERIC, PsycINFO, ProQuest, and JSTOR through January 2016 for meta-analyses pertinent to technology integration in the mathematics classroom.  To identify studies, mathematics subject matter terms such as ‘systematic review’, literature review’ and ‘meta-analysis’ were used. Retrieved studies were screened, extracted, and the methodological quality was evaluated using the 11-item Revised Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (R-AMSTAR). The characteristics of meta-analyses associated with the methodological reporting quality were identified. Results suggest that on average the quality of methodological reporting is good, but there are several areas of concern. Implications are provided to improve research and classroom practice in this area.


Keywords


meta-analysis, systematic review, technology integration, Res

Full Text:

PDF

References


American Educational Research Association. (2006). Standards for reporting on empirical social science research in AERA publications. Educational Researcher, 35(6), 33–40.

American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Capraro, R.M. (2004). Statistical significance, effect size reporting, and confidence intervals: Best reporting strategies. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35(1), 57–62.

Chadwick, D.K.H. (1997). Computer-assisted instruction in secondary mathematics classrooms: A meta-analysis (Ed.D.). Drake University, United States-Iowa. Retrieved fromhttp://search.proquest.com/pqdtglobal/docview/304389928/abstract/9D8837D0D8EB4A14PQ/11

Chan, K. K., & Leung, S.W. (2014). Dynamic geometry software improves mathematical achievement: Systematic review and meta-Analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 51(3), 311–325.

Chen, T.Y. (1994). A meta-analysis of effectiveness of computer-based instruction in mathematics (Ph.D.). The University of Oklahoma, United States - Oklahoma. Retrieved fromhttp://search.proquest.com/pqdtglobal/docview/304105627/abstract/9D8837D0D8EB4A14PQ/5

Cheung, A.C.K., & Slavin, R.E. (2013). The effectiveness of educational technology applications for enhancing mathematics achievement in K-12 classrooms: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 9, 88–113.

Cooper, H. (2016). Research synthesis and meta-analysis: A step-by-step approach (Vol. 2). Sage publications.

Cooper, H., & Patall, E.A. (2009). The relative benefits of meta-analysis conducted with individual participant data versus aggregated data. Psychological Methods, 14(2), 165-176.

DeCoster, J. (2004). Meta-analysis notes. Retrieved from http://www.stathelp.com/Meta%20analysis%202009-06-01.pdf

Ellington, A.J. (2006). The effects of non-CAS graphing calculators on student achievement and attitude levels in mathematics: A Meta-Analysis. School Science and Mathematics, 106(1), 16-23.

Hembree, R., & Dessart, D.J. (1986). Effects of hand-held calculators in precollege mathematics education: a meta-analysis. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 17, 83–99.

Hsu, Y. (2003). The effectiveness of computer-assisted instruction in statistics education: A meta-analysis (Ph.D.). The University of Arizona, United States - Arizona. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/pqdtglobal/docview/305338759/abstract/9D8837D0D8EB4A14PQ/29

King, H.J. (1997). Effects of computer-enhanced instruction in college-level mathematics as determined by a meta-analysis (Ph.D.). The University of Tennessee, United States - Tennessee. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/pqdtglobal/docview/304373727/abstract/9D8837D0D8EB4A14PQ/2

Larwin, K., & Larwin, D. (2011). A meta-Analysis examining the impact of computer-assisted instruction on postsecondary statistics education: 40 years of research. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(3), 253–278.

Lee, W.C. (1990). The effectiveness of computer-assisted instruction and computer programming in elementary and secondary mathematics: A meta-analysis (Ed.D.). University of Massachusetts Amherst, United States - Massachusetts. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/pqdtglobal/docview/303852079/abstract/9D8837D0D8EB4A14PQ/18

Li, Q., & Ma, X. (2010). A meta-analysis of the effects of computer technology on school students’ mathematics learning. Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), 215-243.

Moyer-Packenham, P. S., & Westenskow, A. (2013). Effects of virtual manipulatives on student achievement and mathematics learning: International Journal of Virtual and Personal Learning Environments, 4(3), 35–50.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards of school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2008). Position statement: The role of technology in the teaching and learning of mathematics. Retrieved from http://www.nctm.org/Standards-and-Positions/Position-Statements/Technology-in- Teaching-and-Learning-Mathematics/

Nikolaou, C. (2001). Hand-held calculator use and achievement in mathematics: A meta analysis (Ph.D.). Georgia State University, United States - Georgia. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/pqdtglobal/docview/304696658/abstract/9D8837D0D8EB4A14PQ3

Rosen, Y., & Salomon, G. (2007). The differential learning achievements of constructivist technology-intensive learning environments as compared with traditional ones: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 36(1), 1–14.

Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research (rev ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Sanchez-Meca, J., & Marin-Martinez, F. (1998). Testing continuous moderators in meta-analysis: A comparison of procedures. British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology, 51, 311-326.

Schenker, J.D. (2007). The effectiveness of technology use in statistics instruction in higher education: A meta-analysis using hierarchical linear modeling (Ph.D.). Kent StateUniversity, United States -Ohio. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/pqdtglobal/docview/304835263/abstract/9D8837D0D8EB4A14PQ/25

Schmidt, F.L., & Hunter, J.E. (2014). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Sage publications.

Schmucker, C., Bluemle, A., Briel, M., Portalupi, S., Lang, B., Motschall, E., ... & Meerpohl, J. J. (2013). A protocol for a systematic review on the impact of unpublished studies and studies published in the gray literature in meta-analyses. Systematic Reviews, 2, 24-24.

Steenbergen-Hu, S., & Cooper, H. (2013). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of intelligent tutoring systems on K–12 students’ mathematical learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(4), 970–987.

Thompson, B. (2002). What future quantitative social science research could look like: Confidence intervals for effect sizes. Educational Researcher, 31, 25-32.

Tokpah, C.L. (2008). The effects of computer algebra systems on students’ achievement in mathematics (Ph.D.). Kent State University, United States – Ohio. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/pqdtglobal/docview/304549974/abstract/9D8837D0D8EB4A14PQ

Wang, S., Jiao, H., Young, M. J., Brooks, T., & Olson, J. (2007). A meta-analysis of testing mode effects in grade K-12 mathematics tests. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67(2), 219–238.

Young, J. R., Ortiz, N., & Young, J. L. (2017). STEMulating interest: A meta-analysis of the effects of out-of-school time on student STEM interest. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 5(1), 62-74.

Young, J.R., Young, J.L., & Hamilton, C. (2013). The Use of Confidence Intervals as a Meta-Analytic Lens to Summarize the Effects of Teacher Education Technology Courses on Preservice Teacher TPACK. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(2), 149-172.

Young, J.R. (2016). Unpacking TPACK in Mathematics education research: A systematic review of meta-analyses. InternationalJournal of Educational Methodology, 2(1), 19-29. doi: 10.12973/ijem.2.1.19

Young, J.R., & Young, J.L. (2012). “But that’s not fair”: Teacher technology readiness and African American Students’. The Journal of the Texas Alliance of Black School Educators, 4(1), 19-32.

Zientek, L.R., Capraro, M.M., & Capraro, R.M. (2008). Reporting practices in quantitative teacher education research: One look at the evidence cited in the AERA Panel Report. Educational Researcher, 37, 208–216.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12928/ijeme.v1i1.5713

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Jamaal Rashad Young

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


International Journal on Emerging Mathematics Education
Kampus 2 Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
Jalan Pramuka No. 42, Pandeyan, Umbulharjo, Yogyakarta - 55161
Telp. (0274) 563515, ext. 4902; Fax. (0274) 564604
Email: ijeme@uad.ac.id


p-ISSN: 2549-4996 | e-ISSN: 2548-5806


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

View IJEME's Stats