Creative Thinking Process Based on Wallas Model in Solving Mathematics Problem
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12928/ijeme.v1i2.5783Keywords:
creative thinking process, mathematics problem, Wallas modelAbstract
It’s difficult for junior high school’s teacher to get position and foster their students who’re still in transition in creative thinking. This study evaluated creative thinking process based on a model of Wallas (2014). Subjects were categorized into upper, middle, and low category after doing creative thinking ability test. The variable is an existence of junior high school’s students in solving a mathematics problem. Data were analyzed through classification, data representation, and conclusions. The results showed 1) 23,33% of students only reached preparation stage, called low category, 2) 60% of students reached illumination stage though students take a long time, called middle category, and 3) 16,67% of students have completed up to verification stage, called upper category. By deepening triangulation interview, right students in that category. Students in low and middle category still need assistance when experiencing obstacle in the creative thinking process, while upper category needs of enrichment materials.
References
Aldous, C.R. (2007). Creativity, problem solving and innovative science: Insights from history, cognitive psychology and neuroscience. International Education Journal, 8(2), 176-186.
Bloom. B.S., et al. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Goals. Canada: David McKay Company, Inc.
Bonaci, C.G., Mustata, R.V. & Lenciu, A. (2013). Revisiting bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. The Macrotheme Review, 2(2), 1-9.
Huitt, W. (2011). Bloom et al.'s Taxonomy of the Cognitive Domain. Educational Psychology Interactive. Valdosta, GA: Valdosta State University.
IACBE. (2014). Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives and Writing Intended Learning Outcomes Statements. USA: The International Assembly for Collegiate Business Education.
Krathwohl, D.R. (2002). A revision of Bloom's Taxonomy: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 212-218.
Kwon, O.N., Park, J.S., & Park, J.H. (2006). Cultivating divergent thinking in mathematics through an open-ended approach. Asia Pacific Education Review, 7(1), 51-61.
Maharani, H.R., & Sukestiyarno. (2015). Learning analysis based on humanism theory and mathematics creative thinking ability of students. International Journal of Education and Psychology, 1(2), 11-18.
Pehkonen, E. (1997). The state-of-art in mathematical creativity. ZDM, 29(3), 63-67.
Potur, A.A., & Barkul, O. (2009). Gender and creative thinking in education: A theoretical and experimental overview. Journal of ITU A| Z, 6(2), 44-57.
Runisah, Herman, T., & Dahlan, J.A. (2017). Using the 5E learning cycle with metacognitive technique to enhance students’mathematical critical thinking skills. International Journal on Emerging Mathematics Education, 1(1), 87-98.
Sari, E.P. & Sukestiyarno. (2014). Pemanfaatan media lingkungan dalam pembentukan karakter kemandirian siswa pada pembelajaran matematika model PBL pendekatan konstruktivisme. Proceedings of the National Conferenfe on Conservation for Better Life (NCCBL), Semarang State University, pp. 350-357.
Wallas, G. (2014). The Art of Thought. England:Solis Press.
Wessels, H. (2014). Levels of mathematical creativity in model-eliciting activities. Journal of Mathematical Modelling and Application, 1(9), 22-40.
Widiastuti, M.M.H., & Sukestiyarno. (2014). Pemanfaatan lingkungan sekolah guna menunjang pembelajaran matematika dengan model cycle 7E dalam rangka membentuk karakter rasa ingin tahu siswa dan pemecahan masalah. Proceedings of the National Conferenfe on Conservation for Better Life (NCCBL), Semarang State University, pp. 331-338.
Wulandari & Sukestiyarno. (2015). Development of ATONG based reference module for school geometry subject and analysis of mathematical creative thinking skills. Paper of the International Conference on Mathematics, Science, and Education (ICMSE), Semarang State University.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
License and Copyright Agreement
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal. Please also carefully read the International Journal on Emerging Mathematics Education (IJEME) Author Guidelines at http://journal.uad.ac.id/index.php/IJEME/about/submissions#authorGuidelines
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities, tacitly or explicitly, of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with the International Journal on Emerging Mathematics Education (IJEME) agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.
