Educational Borrowing and Mathematics Curriculum: Realistic Mathematics Education in the Dutch and Indonesian Primary Curriculum

Shintia Revina, Frederick Koon Shing Leung

Abstract


Since the late 1990s, Indonesian mathematics educators have considered Realistic Mathematics Education (RME), the Dutch approach to mathematics instruction, to be the basis for educational reform. In the National curriculum development, RME has, therefore, been reviewed as among the theoretical references to the curriculum goals and content. In the present study, an analysis of the consistency between RME and the curriculum descriptors and contents in Indonesia is presented. This is supplemented with some comparisons to that in the Netherlands. Findings in this study revealed that while most of RME principles are reflected in the Indonesian curriculum, the descriptions were often very general and less explicit compared to the Dutch curriculum. They were also limited by the content-based approach as well as by the centralized decision making process of the contents to be taught which have been pre-determined at the national level. This study suggests future research to see how the curriculum may influence teachers’ enactment of RME at classroom level.

Keywords


Realistic Mathematics Education; Primary Mathematics Curriculum; Curriculum Analysis; Educational Borrowing

Full Text:

PDF

References


Berg, B.L. (2012). Qualitative research methods for the social science. Long Beach: Allyn and Bacon.

Bowen, G.A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40.

BSNP. (2006). Kurikulum tingkat satuan pendidikan (KTSP). Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.

Cohen, D.K., & Ball, D.L. (1990). Relations between policy and practice: An overview. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12(3), 347-353.

De Wet, C., & Wolhuter, C. (2007). From ‘borrowing’ to ‘learning’ in international comparative study: A critical reflection. South African Journal of Education, 27(2), 317–328.

Dhoruri, A. (2010). Pembelajaran matematika dengan Pendekatan Matematika Realistik (PMR). Yogyakarta: Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Dickinson, P., & Hough, S. (2012). Using realistic mathematics education in UK classrooms. Manchester: Centre for Mathematics Education, Manchester Metropolitan University.

Dolowitz, D., & Marsh, D. (1996). Who learns what from whom? A review of the policy transfer literature. Political Studies, 44(2), 343–357.

Farver, J.A.M., Welles-Nystrom, B., Frosch, D.L., Wimbarti, S., & Hoppe-Graff, S. (1997). Toy stories: Aggression in children’s narratives in the United States, Sweden, Germany, and Indonesia. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 28(4), 393-420.

Freudenthal, H. (1983). Didactical phenomenology of mathematical structures. Dordrecht: Reidel Publishing Company.

Freudenthal, H. (1991). Revisiting mathematics education: China Lectures. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Grant, N. (2000). Tasks for comparative education in the new millenium. Comparative Education, 36(3), 309-317.

Gravemeijer, K., & Terwel, J. (2000). Hans Freudenthal a mathematician on didactics and curriculum theory. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32(6), 777-796.

Gravemeijer, K. (1994). Developing Realistic Mathematics Education. Utrecht: CD-ß Press/Freudenthal Institute.

Johar, R., Patahuddin, S., & Widjaja, W. (2017). Linking pre-service teachers’ questioning and students’ strategies in solving contextual problem: A case study in Indonesia and the Netherlands. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 14(1), 101-128.

Leung, F.K.S. (1992). A Comparison of the intended mathematics curriculum in China,Hong Kong and England and the implementation in Beijing, Hong Kong and London. Ph.D. Thesis. London: University of London.

Meyer, M.R. (1997). Mathematics in context: Opening the gates to mathematics for all at the middle level. NASSP Bulletin, 81(586), 53–59.

Morris, P. (2012). Pick’n’mix, select and project, policy borrowing and the quest for ‘world class’schooling: An analysis of the 2010 schools white paper. Journal of Education Policy, 27(1), 89-107.

Phillips, D., & Ochs, K. (2003). Processes of policy borrowing in education: Some explanatory and analytical devices. Comparative Education, 39(4), 451-461.

Puskur (Pusat Kurikulum). (2007). Kajian kebijakan kurikulum mata pelajaran matematika [The Study of Mathematics Curriculum Policy]. Jakarta: Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pusat Kurikulum Depdiknas.

Romberg, T.A. (2001). Designing middle‐school mathematics materials using problems set in context to help students progress from informal to formal mathematical reasoning. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Center for Education Research.

Rose, R. (1991). What is lesson-drawing? Journal of Public Policy, 11(l), 3-30.

Sembiring, R., Hadi, S., & Dolk, M. (2008). Reforming mathematics learning in Indonesia classroom through RME. ZDM–The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40(6), 927-939.

SLO. (2004). Kerndoelen [The Core Goals]. Utrecht: SLO.

Steiner-Khamsi, G. (2004). Globalization in education: Real or imagined? In Gita Steiner-Khamsi, ed., The Global Politics of Educational Borrowing and Lending. New York: Teachers College Press, 1-11.

Taylor, S., Rizvi, F., Lingard, B., & Henry, M. (1997). Educational policy and the politics of change. London UK: Routledge.

Travers, K.J., & Westbury, I. (1989). The IEA Studies of Mathematics I: Analysis of Mathematics Curriculum. Oxford: Pergamon.

Treffers, A. (1987). Three dimensions. A Model of goal and theory description in mathematics instruction-the Wiskobas project. Dordrecht: Reidel Publishing Company.

Tyler, R.W. (1949). Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (2000). Mathematics education in the Netherlands: A guided tour. Freudenthal Institute Cd-rom for ICME9. Utrecht: Utrecht University.

Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (2010). Reform under attack – Forty years of working on better mathematics education thrown on the Scrapheap? No Way! In L. Sparrow, B. Kissane, and C. Hurst (Eds.), Shaping the future of mathematics education, Proceedings of the 33rd annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. Fremantle: MERGA.

Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., & Wijers, M. (2005). Mathematics standards and curricula in the Netherlands. ZDM, 37(4), 287-307.

Van Hiele, P.M. (1973). Begrip en inzicht: Werkboek van de wiskundedidactiek. Muusses.

Widodo, S. (2011). Teknik-teknik inovasi yang digunakan guru SMP dalam membuat soal matematika kontekstual. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Penelitian, Pendidikan dan Penerapan MIPA. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(4), 458-477.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12928/ijeme.v2i1.8025

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


International Journal on Emerging Mathematics Education
Kampus 2 Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
Jalan Pramuka No. 42, Pandeyan, Umbulharjo, Yogyakarta - 55161
Telp. (0274) 563515, ext. 4902; Fax. (0274) 564604
Email: ijeme@uad.ac.id


p-ISSN: 2549-4996 | e-ISSN: 2548-5806


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

View IJEME's Stats