Urgensi Pengaturan Perkara Constitutional Complaint Dalam Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26555/novelty.v7i3.a3931Keywords:
Urgency, Constitutional complaint, Constitutional CourtAbstract
ABSTRACT
This study aimed to evaluate the mechanism for settling disputes in the Constitutional Court containing elements of constitutional complaint. In particular, this study focused on two things: first assessing the urgency/ importance of the idea of setting constitutional complaint in the Constitutional Court's authority. Secondly, to formulate recommendations on setting constitutional complaint in the Constitutional Court's authority.
The method used in this research is descriptive qualitative. This type of research is a doctrinal law. This research studied the concept and implementation of the judicial settlement of cases that contain elements of constitutional complaint (complaint constitution) by the Constitutional Court.
The conclusion of this study is an important constitutional complaint mechanism is contained within the competence of the Constitutional Court to solve problems of injustice experienced by citizens as a result of public policies undertaken by the government in a broad sense, namely the executive, legislature and judiciary. Setting constitutional complaint within the competence of the Constitutional Court does not have to be explicitly stipulated in the constitution, but enough in the explanation of the Constitutional Court Act. That is not to add direct authority of the Court, but expand the meaning of the authority of the Court in testing the law.
References
BUKU DAN JURNAL
Aditya, Zaka Firma (2014). Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Menyelesaikan Perkara Constitutional complaint Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Dasar Tahun 1945. Unnes Law Journal, Vol. 3, No. 1.
Arto, Mukti (2001). Konsepsi Ideal Mahkamah Agung. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Asshiddiqie, Jimly (2011). Konstitusi & Konstitusionalisme Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Fajar, Mukti (2006). Hukum Konstitusi dan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press. J
Fatkhurohman et al. (2004). Memahami Keberadaan Mahkamah Konstitusi di Indonesia. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Handoyo, Hestu Cipto (2003). Hukum Tata Negara, Kewarganegaraan & Hak Asasi Manusia. Yogyakarta: Universitas Atma Jaya.
KRHN dan LeIP (1999). Menuju Independensi Kekuasaan Kehakiman. Jakarta: ICEL.
Krisdanar, Vino Devanta (2010). Menggagas Constitutional complaint dalam Memproteksi Hak Konstitusional Masyarakat Mengenai Kehidupan dan Kebebasan Beragama di Indoneisa. Jurnal Konstitusi, Vol. 7, No.3.
Lutfi, Mustofa (2010). Hukum Sengketa Pemilukada di Indonesia: Gagasan Perluasan Kewenangan Konstitusional Mahkamah Konstitusi. Yogyakarta: UII Press.
Mahfud, Mohammad (1999). Pergulatan Politik dan Hukum di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Gama Media.
_________________ (2009). Konstitusi dan Hukum dalam Kontroversi Isu. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Marbun et al. (2009). Pokok-pokok Hukum Administrasi Negara. Yogyakarta: Liberty.
Muchsan (1981). Peradilan Administrasi Negara. Yogyakarta: Liberty.
Nugroho, Rahmat Muhajir (2015). Urgensi Pengaturan Perkara Constitutional Compalaint dalam Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Laporan Penelitian DIPA Kopertis V Yogyakarta.
Siahaan, Maruarar (2012). Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Sutiyoso, Bambang (2009). Tata Cara Penyelesaian Sengketa di Lingkungan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Yogyakarta: UII Press.
Zoelva, Hamdan (2012). Constitutional complaint dan Constitutional Question dan Perlindungan Hak-hak Konstitusional Warga Negara. Jurnal Media Hukum, Vol.19, No.1.
PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia l945
Undang-Undang Nomor 24 tahun 2003 tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi
