The establishment of LAPS SJK in the trajectory of history viewed from the politics of Indonesian law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26555/novelty.v15i1.a28385Keywords:
LAPS SJK, the Trajectory of History, and the Politics of Indonesian LawAbstract
Introduction to the Problem: The history of the formation of the LAPS SJK is based on the importance of consumer protection in the financial services sector. According to the law concerning the role of the Financial Service Authority, the institution is given the authority to facilitate the settlement of complaints from consumers who are harmed by the finance actors. The OJK then issued regulation (POJK) Number 1/POJK.07/2014 concerning Alternative Dispute Resolution Institutions in the Financial Services Sector (LAPS SJK) which was later replaced by regulation Number 61/POJK.07/2020.
Purpose/Objective Study: This research examines, how is the history of the LAPS SJK formation and how is the legal politics of the formation.
Design/methodology/Approach: This research is normative, using a historical approach. It applies a descriptive method with the secondary data.
Findings: The interesting finding is that the establishment of LAPS SJK is to protect consumers in the event of a dispute with the financial actors, so the legal politics regulating the LASP SJK should be an integrated part of the political scheme of consumer protection law. Institutionally, the legal politics of establishing LAPS SJK is motivated by 3 (three) reasons. The initial reason is the establishment of OJK which has a determinant role and function to supervise integrated financial services business activities for the capital market, banking, and non-banking sectors. Another reason is the reality of the advanced development of technology in the global financial services sector, and the last reason is the need of the parties involved in the financial services sector industry; both consumers and finance actors who need an ideal non-court dispute resolution institution.
Paper Type: Research Article
References
Abdul Jamil, Farid Sufian Bin Shuaib, and Dodik Setiawan Nur Heriyanto. (2023). Recognition and enforcement of indonesian sharia arbitration awards in foreign countries: Challenges and opportunitieS.” IIUM Law Journal 31 (1): 309-32. https://doi.org/10.31436/iiumlj.v31i1.827.
Ainun Fadillah, Firda, and Saskia Amalia Putri. (2021). Alternatif penyelesaian sengketa dan arbitrase (literature review etika). Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen Terapan 2 (6): 744–56. https://doi.org/10.31933/jimt.v2i6.486.
Al Idrus, N. F. (2022). Dampak politik hukum dan respon masyarakat atas pembaharuan undang-undang minerba. Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Dan Keadilan, 3(2), 114–127. https://doi.org/10.18196/jphk.v3i2.14898
Athasya, Amanda, and Yudho Taruno Muryanto. (2019). Tugas dan fungsi otoritas jasa keuangan dalam sengketa perdata terkait perlindungan hukum bagi konsumen. Jurnal Privat Law 7 (2): 164–69.
Bugaric, Bojan. (2004). Openness and transparency in public administration: Challenges for public law. Wis. Int’l LJ 22: 483.
Bustamin, Amirizal, Arini Azka Muthia, and Sonia Ivana Barus. (2022). The protection of spiritual rights in the sharia banking dispute settlement: Overview of the sharia banking law in Indonesia. PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) 9 (3): 388–407. https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v9n3.a5.
Elziny, A. A., Mohamadien, M. A., Ibrahim, H. M., & Abdel Fattah, M. K. (2016). An expert system to manage dispute resolutions in construction projects in Egypt. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 7(1), 57–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2015.05.002
Ferreira, D. B., Giovannini, C., Gromova, E., & da Rocha Schmidt, G. (2022). Arbitration chambers and trust in technology provider: Impacts of trust in technology intermediated dispute resolution proceedings. Technology in Society, 68, 101872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101872
Fitriana, Mia Kusuma. (2018). Peranan politik hukum dalam pembentukan peraturan perundang-undangan di indonesia sebagai sarana mewujudkan tujuan negara (laws and regulations in indonesia as the means of realizing the country’s goal). Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia 12 (2).
Ghio, A., & Verona, R. (2022). Unfolding institutional plurality in hybrid organizations through practices: The case of a cooperative bank. The British Accounting Review, 54(4), 101041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2021.101041
Greve, H. R., & Rao, H. (2014). History and the present: Institutional legacies in communities of organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 34, 27–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2014.09.002
Hanifah, M. (2016). Kajian yuridis: Mediasi sebagai alternatif penyelesaian sengketa perdata di pengadilan. ADHAPER: Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata 2 (1): 1–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36913/jhaper.v2i1.21.
Heryansyah, D. (2016). Pergeseran politik hukum otonomi daerah di indonesia (studi terhadap kedudukan dan kewenangan gubernur dalam undang-undang pemerintah daerah pasca reformasi) (Doctoral Dissertation).” n.d.
I Wayan Pertama Yasa, Ni Komang Arini Styawati Styawati, and Ni Made Puspasutari Ujianti. (2022). Perlindungan hukum terhadap ketentuan me-review produk dimedia sosial. Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum 3 (1): 210–14. https://doi.org/10.22225/juinhum.3.1.4747.210-214.
Isharyanto. (2016). Politik hukum. 1st ed. Surakarta: Kekata Group.
Islamiyati, Islamiyati, and Dewi Hendrawati. (2019). Analisis politik hukum dan implementasinya. Law, Development and Justice Review 2 (1): 104–17. https://doi.org/10.14710/ldjr.v2i1.5139.
Jinaratana, Andika, Yofi Permatasari, and Meliana Kartika H. (2023). Legal protection of policyholders for claim issues insurance coverage based on positive Indonesian law. Asian Journal of Social and Humanities 1 (07): 302–9. https://doi.org/10.59888/ajosh.v1i07.32.
Juni Desiani, and N.G.N Renti Maharaini Kerti. (2023). Perlindungan konsumen atas informasi yang tidak jelas menurut undang-undang perlindungan konsumen. Reformasi Hukum Trisakti 5 (1): 165–74. https://doi.org/10.25105/refor.v5i1.15251.
Karsayuda, M. Rifqinizamy. (2015). Politik hukum nasional legislasi hukum ekonomi syariah. De Jure: Jurnal Hukum Dan Syar’iah 7 (1): 39–46. https://doi.org/10.18860/j-fsh.v7i1.3510.
“Law No. 4 of 2023 on Financial sector development and strengthening, Article 1 Point 38.” n.d.
“Law No. 4 of 2023 on Financial sector development and strengthening, Article 1 Point 40.” n.d.
“Law of the republic of Indonesia Number 21 of 2011 concerning the financial services authority, Article 1 Number 1.” n.d.
Mahfuz, Abdul Latif. (2020). faktor yang mempengaruhi politik hukum dalam suatu pembentukan undang-undang. Jurnal Kepastian Hukum Dan Keadilan 1 (1): 43–57.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. (2013). Penelitian hukum.
Maysarah. (2019). penyelenggaraan pemerintahan yang bersih melalui penerapan politik hukum. Majalah Ilmiah Warta Dharmawangsa 13 (3): 34–42. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.46576/wdw.v0i61.433.
Michels, Ank, and Laurens De Graaf. (2010). Examining citizen participation: Local participatory policy making and democracy. Local Government Studies 36 (4): 477–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2010.494101.
Moh. Mahfud M.D. (2007). Politik hukum di Indonesia. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers. Jakarta.
Mortensen, L., & Kornov, L. (2019). Critical factors for industrial symbiosis emergence process. Journal of Cleaner Production, 212, 56 69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.222
Muhammad Iqbal Baiquni. (2022). Arbitrators as a legal profession in the alternative role of dispute resolution in Indonesia.” Jurnal Humaya: Jurnal Hukum, Humaniora, Masyarakat, Dan Budaya 2 (1): 12–20. https://doi.org/10.33830/humaya_fhisip.v2i1.3057.
Nasution, Bahder Johan. (2008). Metode penelitian ilmu hukum, Bandung: CV." Mandar Maju.
Ni'matul Huda. (2023). Politik hukum dan pembangunan sistem hukum nasional. 1st ed. Jakarta: Jakarta : Sinar Grafika.
Novkovic, S., Puusa, A., & Miner, K. (2022). Co-operative identity and the dual nature: From paradox to complementarities. Journal of Co-Operative Organization and Management, 10(1), 100162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcom.2021.100162
NUGROHO, A. W. (2015). THE bank mediation agency as an alternative to resolve disputes between bankers (a jurical analysis of the role of the bank mediation agency after Bank Indonesia’s Role Has Been Partially Transferred to the Financial Services Author.” n.d. https://dspace.uii.ac.id/handle/123456789/8532.
Nurhayati, Siti, Nurjamil Nurjamil, and Muhammad Haris Fadhillah. (2022). Measuring opportunities and challenges in dispute resolution of fintech sharia business (through) LAPS. Batulis Civil Law Review 3 (1): 1. https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v3i1.929.
Padmo, Wahjono. (1986). Indonesia negara berdasarkan atas hukum. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
Peristiwi Rejeki, Henlia. (2022). Peralihan kewenangan bank Indonesia kepada otoritas jasa keuangan (OJK) berdasarkan hukum positif di Indonesia. Pamulang Law Review 5 (1): 39. https://doi.org/10.32493/palrev.v5i1.23608.
Pratama, Muldan Halim, Ali Abdurahman, and Mei Susanto. (2020). Politik hukum pembentukan undang-undang yang berkelanjutan di Indonesia ditinjau dari desain masa jabatan lembaga pembentuknya.” Asy-Syir’ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari’ah Dan Hukum 54 (2): 389. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajish.v54i2.927.
Rahmawati, Ema, and Rai Mantili. (2016). Penyelesaian sengketa melalui lembaga alternatif penyelesaian sengketa di sektor jasa keuangan." PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) 3 (2): 240-60. https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v3n2.a2.
Rama, B. G. A. (2022).Alternatif penyelesaian sengketa jasa keuangan melalui LAPS-SJK: Perspektif kepastian hukumInternational Conference Towards Humanity Justice for Law Enforcement and Dispute Settlement,1 (1) https://journal.undiknas.ac.id/index.php/icfh/article/view/3923
Rambe, T. A. F., Sunarmi, S., Siregar, M., & Sukarja, D. (2022). Kewenangan badan penyelesaian sengketa konsumen kota medan memeriksa sengketa konsumen jasa keuangan pasca terbentuknya lembaga alternatif penyelesaian sengketa sektor jasa keuangan. Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review, 109-116. https://doi.org/10.56128/ljoalr.v1i2.57
Salim, H. S. (2013). Penerapan teori hukum pada penelitian tesis dan disertasi.
Schaeffer, P. R., Guerrero, M., DAN Fischer, B. B. (2021). Mutualism in ecosystems of innovation and entrepreneurship: A bidirectional perspective on universities' linkages. Journal of Business Research,134,184-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.05.039
Sebyar, M. (2022). Politik hukum undang-undang nomor 16 tahun 2019 tentang perubahan atas undang-undang nomor 1 tahun 1974 tentang perkawinan. IUS: Jurnal Ilmiah Fakultas Hukum, 9(1), 47-65. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.51747/ius.v0i01.963
Simanjuntak, J. L., & Simanjuntak, K. (2023). alternatif penyelesaian sengketa klaim asuransi di BMAI dan LAPS SJK. UNES Law Review, 5(4), 3593-3613. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.675
Soekanto, S. (2006). Pengantar penelitian hukum. (No Title).
Sugianto, F. A., & Marpaung, D. S. H. (2022). Efektivitas peranan mediasi dalam upaya alternatif penyelesaian sengketa kekayaan intelektual. Jurnal Meta-Yuridis, 5(1), 51-59. https://doi.org/10.26877/m-y.v5i1.8756
Syaukani, I. (2011). Dasar-dasar politik hukum.
William Zevenbergen dalam Abdul Latif dan Hasbi Ali. (2011). No Title (1st ed.). Sinar Grafika.
Yusuf, M. (2021). eksistensi hukum jinayat dalam masyarakat nusantara. legitimasi: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Dan Politik Hukum, 10(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.22373/legitimasi.v10i1.10516
Yusuf, M. (2022). Keberlakuan Peraturan dalam undang-undang yang tidak kunjung diterbitkan peraturan pemerintah sebagai peraturan pelaksanaannya. Jurnal Restorasi Hukum, 5(1), 67. https://doi.org/10.14421/jrh.v5i1.2380
