Instructional Concept Map Techniques in the Planning Stage– Project Based Learning on Student Argumentation Skills
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26555/bioedukatika.v10i3.24719Keywords:
Argumentationskills, Instructional techniques, Concept map, Projectbasedlearning, PlanningstageAbstract
Argumentation skill is one of the characteristics of HOTS (Higher Order Thinking Skill) that students need in learning. This study aims to identify the effect of applying the concept map instructional technique at the planning an investigation stage of PjBL on students’ argumentation skills. The study used a quasi-experimental research design with a posttest-only nonequivalent group design. The subject of the study is the tenth grade students of Senior High School (SHS). There were 72 students. The research instrument uses 11 numbered argumentative questions in the form of multiple-choice true-false reasoned questions that match the argumentation component. Data analysis used quantitative analysis based on posttest scores. The results showed that the significance value of the t-test on the argumentation skill score was 0.000, meaning that the significance value was <0.05, so it can be stated that there was an effect of applying the concept map instructional technique in the planning and investigation stage in the PjBL model on students’ argumentation skills.
References
Acar, O., & Patton, B. R. (2012). Argumentation and Formal Reasoning Skillsin an Argumentation-Based Guided Inquiry Course. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 4756–4760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.331
Buchanan Hill, J. (2016). Questioning Techniques: A Study of Instructional Practice. Peabody Journal of Education, 91(5), 660–671. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2016.1227190
Boone, W. J., Staver, J. R., Yale, M. S., Boone, W. J., Staver, J. R., & Yale, M. S. (2014). Item Measures. Rasch Analysis in the Human Sciences, 93–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6857-4_5
Chen, C. H., Chou, Y. Y., & Huang, C. Y. (2016). An Augmented-Reality-Based Concept Map to Support Mobile Learning for Science. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 25(4), 567–578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-016-0284-3
Chen, Y. C., Benus, M. J., & Hernandez, J. (2019). Managing uncertainty in scientific argumentation. Science Education, 103(5), 1235–1276. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21527
Cigdemoglu, C., Arslan, H. O., & Cam, A. (2017). Argumentation to foster pre-service science teachers’ knowledge, competency, and attitude on the domains of chemical literacy of acids and bases. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 18(2), 288–303. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6rp00167j
Dawson, V., & Venville, G. (2013). Introducing High School Biology Students to Argumentation About Socioscientific Issues. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 13(4), 356–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2013.845322
Du, X., & Han, J. (2016). A Literature Review on the Definition and Process of Project-Based Learning and Other Relative Studies. Creative Education, 07(07), 1079–1083. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2016.77112
Eichler, J. F., & Peeples, J. (2016). Flipped classroom modules for large enrollment general chemistry courses: a low barrier approach to increase active learning and improve student grades. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17(1), 197-208.
Erduran, S. (2018). Toulmin’s argument pattern as a “horizon of possibilities” in the study of argumentation in science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 13(4), 1091–1099. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-017-9847-8
Fakhriyah, F., & Masfuah, S. (2021). The analysis of scientific argumentation skill and computational thinking skill of the primary educational teacher department students. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2331. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0041655
Gabriel, V. de O., Panisson, A. R., Bordini, R. H., Adamatti, D. F., & Billa, C. Z. (2020). Reasoning in BDI agents using Toulmin’s argumentation model. Theoretical Computer Science, 805, 76–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2019.10.026
Gündüz, G. F. (2016). Instructional Techniques. In: Instructional Process and Concepts in Theory and Practice (pp. 147-232). Springer Singapore.
Haruna, A., & Nahadi. (2021). Menjelajahi Hubungan Level Argumentasi Dengan Kemampuan Berfikir Kritis Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Ikatan Kimia. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 15(1), 2686–2694.
Hefter, M. H., Berthold, K., Renkl, A., Riess, W., Schmid, S., & Fries, S. (2014). Effects of a training intervention to foster argumentation skills while processing conflicting scientific positions. Instructional Science, 42(6), 929–947. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-014-9320-y
Ishaq, I. M., Khaeruddin, K., & Usman, U. (2022). Analisis Kemampuan Berargumentasi Dalam Pembelajaran Fisika Peserta Didik Sma Negeri 8 Makassar. Jurnal Sains Dan Pendidikan Fisika, 17(3), 211. https://doi.org/10.35580/jspf.v17i3.29781
Maiturrohmah, & Fadly, W. (2020). Integrative Science Education and Teaching Activity Journal Looking at a Portrait of Student Argumentation Skills on the Concept of Inheritance ( 21st Century Skills Study ). Jurnal IAIN Ponorogo, I(1), 17–33.
María, A., Apodaca, J., Mcinerney, J. D., Sala, O. E., Katinas, L., & Crisci, J. V. (2019). A Concept Map of Evolutionary Biology to Promote Meaningful Learning in Biology FEATURE ARTICLE A Concept Map of Evolutionary Biology to Promote Meaningful Learning in Biology We propose a way to visualize main ideas about evolution in the context of the . 81(May), 79–87.
Muhammad Rafik, Vini Putri Febrianti, Afifah Nurhasanah, & Siti Nurdianti Muhajir. (2022). Telaah Literatur: Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Project Based Learning (PjBL) terhadap Kreativitas Siswa Guna Mendukung Pembelajaran Abad 21. Jurnal Pembelajaran Inovatif, 5(1), 80–85. https://doi.org/10.21009/jpi.051.10
Novak J. D. & Gowin, D.B. (1984). Learning How To Learn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Osborne, J. F., Henderson, J. B., MacPherson, A., Szu, E., Wild, A., & Yao, S. Y. (2016). The development and validation of a learning progression for argumentation in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(6), 821–846. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21316
Pangestika, I. W., Ramli, M., & Nurmiyati, N. (2017). The changing of oral argumentation process of grade XI students through Socratic dialogue. International Journal of Science and Applied Science: Conference Series, 2(1), 198. https://doi.org/10.20961/ijsascs.v2i1.16710
Reiska, P., Soika, K., & Cañas, A. J. (2018). Using concept mapping to measure changes in interdisciplinary learning during high school. Knowledge Management and E-Learning, 10(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2018.10.001
Shanmugavelu, G., Ariffin, K., Vadivelu, M., Mahayudin, Z., & R K Sundaram, M. A. (2020). Questioning Techniques and Teachers’ Role in the Classroom. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 8(4), 45–49. https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v8i4.3260
Sottilare, R., Defalco, J., & Connor, J. (2014). A Guide to Instructional Techniques, Strategies and Tactics to Manage Learner Affect, Engagement, and Grit Standards for Adaptive Tutoring Systems View project Using GIFT and MOOCs to support adaptive training experiences View project. July, 7–33. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267039871
Su, K. D. (2020). An argumentation-based study with concept mapping approach in identifying students’ scientific performance skills. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 16(4).
Surahman, E., Kuswandi, D., & Wedi, A. (2019). Students’ Perception of Project-Based Learning Model in Blended Learning Mode Using Sipejar. … Conference on Education …, 372(ICoET), 183–188. https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/icoet-19/125925078
Tama, N. B., Probosari, R. M., Widoretno, S., & Indriyati, I. (2016). Project Based Learning to Improve Written Argumentation Skill of Tenth Graders. Bioedukasi: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 9(2), 67. https://doi.org/10.20961/bioedukasi-uns.v9i2.4224
Toulmin, S. (2003). The Uses of Argument. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Turgut, Halil (2008). Prospective Science Teachers ’ Conceptualizations About Project Based. International Journal of Instruction, 1(1), 62–79.
Widatama, Arya D., Widoretno, S., Dwiastuti, S., Sajidan, & Maridi. (2019). Instructional technique questions in the planning phase of project based learning to increase the score of concept map. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1241(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1241/1/012047
Zahra, F., Zubaidah, S., Mahanal, S., & Astriani, M. (2021). The improvement of students’ argumentation skills through Remap-NHT learning model. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2330(March). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0043291
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with Jurnal Bioedukatika agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
