Critical thinking and representation skills of biology students: Are they related?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26555/bioedukatika.v10i1.21605Keywords:
Critical thinking skills, Representation skills, Plant PhysiologyAbstract
Critical thinking skills are relevant skills in the contemporary industrial 4.0 era. The current study aimed to investigate the correlation between critical thinking and representation skills and the extent to which the two variables are related. This study was conducted at UNDIKMA and UNW Mataram, West Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia between March and August 2020. It involved 62 students from the Department of Biology Education. The research data were gathered using essay questions on Plant Physiology. Data analysis was performed using the Pearson correlation test, followed by a simple linear regression analysis. The statistical analysis showed a correlation between critical thinking and representation skills among biology students (r = 0.948, p < 0.001, N = 62). The correlation was positive with regression equation Y = 12.122 + 0.835x. Therefore, educators are advised to promote critical thinking in the classroom to support student representation skills.
References
Ainsworth, S. (2006). DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learning and Instruction, 16(3), 183-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.03.001
Ainsworth, S. (2008). The educational value of multiple-representations when learning complex scientific concepts. In Visualization: Theory and Practice in Science Education (pp. 191-208). Springer Netherlands. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-4020-5267-5_9
Ainsworth, S. E. (2018). Multi-modal, multi-source reading: A multi-representational reader's perspective. Learning and Instruction, 57, 71-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.01.014
Al-Samarraie, H., Teo, T., & Abbas, M. (2013). Can structured representation enhance students' thinking skills for better understanding of E-learning content? Computers & Education, 69, 463-473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.038
Amin, A. M., Duran Corebima, A., Zubaidah, S., & Mahanal, S. (2017, 2017). The critical thinking skills profile of preservice biology teachers in animal physiology. 3rd International Conference on Education and Training (ICET 2017),
Anderson, T. R., Schönborn, K. J., du Plessis, L., Gupthar, A. S., & Hull, T. L. (2013). Identifying and developing students’ ability to reason with concepts and representations in biology. In D. F. Treagust & C.-Y. Tsui (Eds.), Multiple Representations in Biological Education (pp. 19-38). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4192-8_2
Arikunto, S. (2013). Prosedur penelitian suatu pendekatan praktik. Rineka Cipta.
http://r2kn.litbang.kemkes.go.id:8080/handle/123456789/62880
files/480/62880.html
Beck, C., & Nerdel, C. (2019). Multiple external representations (MERS) as a component of special language in biology. In Bridging Research and Practice in Science Education (Vol. 6, pp. 51-71). Springer International Publishing. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-17219-0_4
Carolan, J., Prain, V., & Waldrip, B. (2008). Using representations for teaching and learning in science. Teaching Science, 54(1), 18-23. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ904915files/389/eric.ed.gov.html
Caroselli, M. (2009). 50 Activities for developing critical thinking skills. HRD Press, Inc. https://www.studocu.com/cl/document/universidad-de-concepcion/ingles-i/50-activities-for-developing-critical-thinking-skills/9315840
files/484/9315840.html
Facione, P. A. (2011). Critical thinking: what it is and why it counts. Measured Reasons LLC. https://www.insightassessment.com/wp-content/uploads/ia/pdf/whatwhy.pdf
Farida, I., Liliasari, Widyantoro, D. H., & Sopandi, W. (2010, 2010). Representational competence’s profile of pre-service chemistry teachers in chemical problem solving. 4th International Seminar of Science Education, Bandung,
Fatmawati, A., Zubaidah, S., Mahanal, S., & Sutopo. (2019). Critical thinking, creative thinking, and learning achievement: How they are related. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1417(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1417/1/012070
Finken, M., & Ennis, R. H. (1993). Illionis critical thinking essay test. Illinois Critical Thinking Project, Department of Educationl Policy Studies.
Fuad, N. M., Zubaidah, S., Mahanal, S., & Suarsini, E. (2017). Improving junior high schools’ critical thinking skills based on test three different models of learning. International Journal of Instruction, 10(01), 101-116. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2017.1017a
Gilbert, J. K. (2010). The role of visual representations in the learning and teaching of science: An introduction. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 11(1), 1-19. https://www.eduhk.hk/apfslt/download/v11_issue1_files/foreword.pdf
Halpern, D. F. (2014). Thought and knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking, 5th ed. Psychology Press. files/470/2013-22957-000.html
Heaviside, H. J., Manley, A. J., & Hudson, J. (2018). Bridging the gap between education and employment: a case study of problem-based learning implementation in Postgraduate Sport and Exercise Psychology. Higher Education Pedagogies, 3(1), 463-477. https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2018.1462095
Hong, Y.-C., & Choi, I. (2015). Assessing reflective thinking in solving design problems: The development of a questionnaire: Assessing reflection in design tasks. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(4), 848-863. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12181
Hopkins, W. G., & Huner, N. P. A. (2008). Introduction to plant physiology, 4th edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://www.agrifs.ir/sites/default/files/Introduction%20to%20Plant%20Physiology%20%7BWilliam%20G.%20Hopkins%7D%20%5B9780470247662%5D%20%28Wiley%20-%202008%29.pdf
Hwang, W.-Y., Chen, N.-S., Dung, J.-J., & Yang, Y.-L. (2007). Multiple representation skills and creativity effects on mathematical problem solving using a multimedia whiteboard system. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 10(2), 191-212. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.10.2.191
Ismail, N. S., Harun, J., Zakaria, M. A. Z. M., & Salleh, S. M. (2018). The effect of mobile problem-based learning application DicScience PBL on students’ critical thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 28, 177-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.04.002
Kozma, R. (2003). The material features of multiple representations and their cognitive and social affordances for science understanding. Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 205-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00021-X
Lengkana, D., Surbakti, A., & Amala, D. (2020, 2020). The effect of mind mapping and learning style on concepts mastery and students’ representation skills. International Conference on Progressive Education (ICOPE 2019),
Mackey, T. (2016). Contextual teaching and learning. In The SAGE Encyclopedia of Online Education (S. Danver ( ) ed., pp. 256-258). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483318332.n86
Mahanal, S., Tendrita, M., Ramadhan, F., Ismirawati, N., & Zubaidah, S. (2017). The analysis of students' critical thinking skills on biology subject. Anatolian Journal of Education, 2(2), 21-39. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1244660files/405/eric.ed.gov.html
Miele, D. B., & Wigfield, A. (2014). Quantitative and qualitative relations between motivation and critical-analytic thinking. Educational Psychology Review, 26(4), 519-541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9282-2
Nurfathurrahmah, N. (2018). Penerapan model problem based learning (PBL) berbasis kontekstual terhadap peningkatan kemampuan berpikir kritis mahasiswa. ORYZA ( JURNAL PENDIDIKAN BIOLOGI ), 7(1), 21-28. https://doi.org/10.33627/oz.v7i1.7
Opfermann, M., Schmeck, A., & Fischer, H. E. (2017). Multiple representations in physics and science education – why should we use them? In Multiple Representations in Physics Education (Vol. 10, pp. 1-22). Springer International Publishing. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-58914-5_1
Ploetzner, R., Lippitsch, S., Galmbacher, M., Heuer, D., & Scherrer, S. (2009). Students’ difficulties in learning from dynamic visualisations and how they may be overcome. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(1), 56-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.06.006
Prain, V., & Tytler, R. (2012). Learning through constructing representations in science: A framework of representational construction affordances. International Journal of Science Education, 34(17), 2751-2773. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.626462
Prain, V., Tytler, R., & Peterson, S. (2009). Multiple representation in learning about evaporation. International Journal of Science Education, 31(6), 787-808. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701824249
Rahmatina, D. I., Sutopo, S., & Wartono, W. (2017, 2017). Pemahaman konsep dan kemampuan multirepresentasi siswa SMA pada materi usaha-energi. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan IPA 2017,
Rau, M. A., & Matthews, P. G. (2017). How to make ‘more’ better? Principles for effective use of multiple representations to enhance students’ learning about fractions. ZDM, 49(4), 531-544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0846-8
Sanchez, C. S., Rivas, S. F., & Moral, S. O. (2015). Collaborative learning supported by rubrics improves critical thinking. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 15(1), 10-19. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v15i1.12905
Sari, N. M., Setyarini, M., Lengkana, D., & Jalmo, T. (2021, 2021). The use of vertical representation in students’ science book on matter particles topic and its impact on students’ HOTS and visual literacy. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Progressive Education, ICOPE 2020, 16-17 October 2020, Universitas Lampung, Bandar Lampung, Indonesia,
Schnotz, W. (2002). Towards an integrated view of learning from text and visual displays. Educational Psychology Review, 14(1), 101-120. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013136727916
Schönborn, K. J., & Bögeholz, S. (2009). Knowledge transfer in biology and translation across external representations: experts' views and challenges for learning. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(5), 931-955. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-009-9153-3
Sumarno, S., Ibrahim, M., & Supardi, Z. A. I. (2016). Validity of multiple representation supported argumentation (MRSA) learning model to treat complex system reasoning ability. Proceeding of ICMSE, 3(1), 54-B. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/icmse/article/view/13367
Sutopo. (2013). Improving students’ representational skill and generic science skill using representational approach. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 19(1), 7-16. https://doi.org/10.17977/jip.v19i1.3750
Taiz, L., & Zeiger, E. (2010). Plant physiology fifth edition (5th Edition). Sinauer Associates Inc., Publishers. //36.82.106.238/akasia/index.php?p=show_detail&id=237&keywords=files/461/index.html
Tajudin, N. a. M., & Chinnappan, M. (2016). The link between higher order thinking skills, representation and concepts in enhancing TIMSS tasks. International Journal of Instruction, 9(2), 199-214. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2016.9214a
Tang, K.-S., Delgado, C., & Moje, E. B. (2014). An integrative framework for the analysis of multiple and multimodal representations for meaning-making in science education. Science Education, 98(2), 305-326. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21099
Temel, S. (2014). The effects of problem-based learning on pre-service teachers’ critical thinking dispositions and perceptions of problem-solving ability. South African Journal of Education, 34(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.15700/201412120936
Thompson, C. (2011). Critical thinking across the curriculum: Process over output. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1(9), 1-7. http://www.ijhssnet.com/journals/Vol._1_No._9_Special_Issue_July_2011/1.pdf
Treagust, D. F., & Tsui, C.-Y. (2013). Multiple Representations in Biological Education (D. F. Treagust & C.-Y. Tsui, Eds. Vol. 7). Springer Netherlands. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-94-007-4192-8
Utami, C. T. P., Mardiyana, & Triyanto. (2019). Profile of students’ mathematical representation ability in solving geometry problems. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 243. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/243/1/012123
Wechsler, S. M., Saiz, C., Rivas, S. F., Vendramini, C. M. M., Almeida, L. S., Mundim, M. C., & Franco, A. (2018). Creative and critical thinking: Independent or overlapping components? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 27, 114-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.12.003
Wulandari, T. S. H., Amin, M., Zubaidah, S., & Al Mudhar, M. H. I. (2016, 2016). Implementasi keterampilan berpikir kritis dosen biologi di universitas. Seminar Nasional ke-3 Biologi/IPA dan Pembelajarannya,
Zubaidah, S. (2010, 2010). Berpikir kritis: Kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi yang dapat dikembangkan melalui pembelajaran sains. Seminar Nasional Sains 2010 dengan Tema “Optimalisasi Sains untuk Memberdayakan Manusia",
Zubaidah, S., Corebima, A. D., Mahanal, S., & Mistianah, M. (2018). Revealing the relationship between reading interest and critical thinking skills through remap GI and remap jigsaw. International Journal of Instruction, 11(2), 41-56. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.1124a
Zubaidah, S., Fuad, N. M., Mahanal, S., & Suarsini, E. (2017). Improving creative thinking skills of students through differentiated science inquiry integrated with mind map. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 14(4), 77-91. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10214a)
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with Jurnal Bioedukatika agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
