Teleological vs. Scientific views of evolution theory among high school biology teachers in Argentina, Brazil, and Uruguay
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26555/bioedukatika.v9i2.20715Keywords:
Latin America, Science denial, Science-religion relationship, Science educationAbstract
This study explored the degree to which High School biology teachers in three Latin American countries embraced the religious concept of teleology or used it to motivate religious students to accept Darwinian evolutions scientific theory. The countries were (in increasing religiosity order): Uruguay, Brazil, and Argentina. We administered a one-item questionnaire to teachers in each country. It inquired how strongly teachers agreed or disagreed with the test statement: The emergence of the human species (Homo sapiens) was the aim of the evolution of living species. High School biology teachers acceptance and use of teleology was minimal in all three countries and related neither to their own religious beliefs nor to their countrys degree of religiosity. We followed up with interviews of a subsample of 10 participating teachers in each country. Interviews were interpreted using Collective Subject Discourse (DSC) analysis. Teachers in Argentina and Uruguay reported difficulty overcoming students anti-science attitudes, especially their anti-evolution attitudes. We conclude that improvement of pedagogical strategies is needed to motivate student acceptance of Darwinian evolution. Such strategies must appeal especially to students with highly religious upbringing, who disproportionately repudiate evolution and other scientific theories that are unpopular among highly religious people.References
Allmon, W. D. (2011). Why don’t people think evolution is true? Implications for teaching, in and out of the classroom. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 4(4), 648–665. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-011-0371-0
Alves, E. F. (2015). Teoria do design inteligente. Clinical & Biomedical Research, 35(4), 250–251. https://doi.org/10.4322/2357-9730.59738
Andrade, G. (2009). Evaluación de los principales argumentos creacionistas en contra de la teoría de la evolución. Interciencia, 34(5), 366–372. https://www.interciencia.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/366-e-ANDRADE-7.pdf
Artigas, M. (2007). Ciencia y religioÌn:Conceptos fundamentales. EUNSA.
Ayala, F. (1999). Adaptation and novelty: Teleological explanations in evolutionary biology. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 21(1), 3–33. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23332201
Ayala, F. J. (2007). Darwin’s greatest discovery: Design without designer. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(Supplement 1), 8567–8573. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0701072104
Ayala, Francisco J. (2007). Darwin y el diseño inteligente. Alianza.
Barbour, I. (1990). Religion in an age of science. Harper One.
Bishop, B. A., & Anderson, C. W. (1990). Student conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(5), 415–427. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660270503
Boesch, C., & Tomasello, M. (1998). Chimpanzee and human cultures. Current Anthropology, 39(5), 591–614. https://doi.org/10.1086/204785
Brem, S. K., & Sinatra, G. M. (2012). Evolution challenges: Integrating research and practice in teaching and learning about evolution (K. S. Rosengren, S. K. Brem, E. M. Evans, & G. M. Sinatra (eds.)). Oxford University Press.
Britten, R. J. (2002). Divergence between samples of chimpanzee and human DNA sequences is 5%, counting indels. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(21), 13633–13635. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.172510699
Burkhardt, R. W. (2013). Lamarck, evolution, and the inheritance of acquired characters. Genetics, 194(4), 793–805. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.113.151852
Carvalho, G. S., & Clément, P. (2007). Projecto “Educação em biologia, educação para a saúde e educação ambiental para uma melhor cidadania”: Análise de manuais escolares e concepções de professores de 19 países (europeus, africanos e do próximo oriente). Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa Em Educação Em Ciências, 7(2).
Cobern, W. W. (1996). Worldview theory and conceptual change in science education. Science Education, 80(5), 579–610. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199609)80:5<579::AID-SCE5>3.0.CO;2-8
Cobern, W. W. (2000). Everyday thoughts about nature: A worldview investigation of important concepts students use to make sense of nature with specific attention to science. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Cornish-Bowden, A., & Cárdenas, M. L. (2007). The threat from creationism to the rational teaching of biology. Biological Research, 40(2), 113–122. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0716-97602007000200002
Coutinho, F. A., & Silva, F. A. R. e. (2013). Ciência e religião: uma guerra desnecessária. Ciência Hoje, 18–21. https://cienciahoje.org.br/artigo/uma-guerra-desnecessaria/
Deloison, Y. (1997). Description d’un astragale fossile de primate et comparaison avec des astragales de chimpanzeÌs, d’Homo sapiens et d’hominides fossiles: AustralopitheÌ€ques et Homo habilis. Comptes Rendus de l’Académie Des Sciences. Série 2, Earth & Planetary Sciences, 324(8), 685–692.
Deniz, H., Donnelly, L. A., & Yilmaz, I. (2008). Exploring the factors related to acceptance of evolutionary theory among Turkish preservice biology teachers: Toward a more informative conceptual ecology for biological evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(4), 420–443. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20223
El-Hani, C. N., & Sepulveda, C. (2010). The relationship between science and religion in the education of protestant biology preservice teachers in a Brazilian university. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 5(1), 103–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-009-9212-7
Galli, L. M. G., & Meinardi, E. N. (2011). The role of teleological thinking in learning the darwinian model of evolution. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 4(1), 145–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-010-0272-7
Ghiselin, M. T. (1994). Darwin’s language may seem teleological, but his thinking is another matter. Biology & Philosophy, 9(4), 489–492. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00850377
Glick, T. F. (2010). The comparative reception of Darwinism: A brief history. Science & Education, 19(6–8), 693–703. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-010-9235-1
González Galli, L., Peréz, G., & Gómez Galindo, A. A. (2020). The self-regulation of teleological thinking in natural selection learning. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 13(1), Article 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12052-020-00120-0
Gould, S. J. (1997). Nonoverlapping magisteria. Natural History, 106(2), 16–22.
Gould, S. J. (1999). Rocks of ages: Science and religion in the fullness of life. Random House Publishing Group.
Gumucio, C. P. (2005). ¿América Latina ya no es católica? Pluralismo cultural y religioso creciente. América Latina Hoy, 41, 17–34.
Handel, A. E., & Ramagopalan, S. V. (2010). Is Lamarckian evolution relevant to medicine? BMC Medical Genetics, 11(1), 73. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2350-11-73
Huxley, T. H. (1901). Man’s place in nature and others anthropological essay. MacMillan Company.
Jensen, M. S., & Finley, F. N. (1995). Teaching evolution using historical arguments in a conceptual change strategy. Science Education, 79(2), 147–166. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730790203
Jungwirth, E. (1975). The problem of teleology in biology as a problem of biology-teacher education. Journal of Biological Education, 9(6), 243–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.1975.9654037
Kampourakis, K. (2020). Students’ “teleological misconceptions” in evolution education: why the underlying design stance, not teleology per se, is the problem. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 13(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12052-019-0116-z
Kampourakis, K., Palaiokrassa, E., Papadopoulou, M., Pavlidi, V., & Argyropoulou, M. (2012). Children’s intuitive teleology: Shifting the focus of evolution education research. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 5(2), 279–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-012-0393-2
Kojonen, E. V. R. (2013). Tensions in intelligent design’s critique of theistic evolutionism. Zygon, 48(2), 251–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/zygo.12010
Kung, H. (2007). El principio de todas las cosas: Ciencia y religioÌn. Trotta.
Lalueza-Fox, C. (2013). Palabras en el tiempo. Critica.
Lamarck, J. B. (1914). Zoological philosophy. McMillan.
Leakey, R. E. (1997). A origem da especie humana. “The origin of human species.” Rocco.
Lefevre, F., & Lefevre, A. M. C. (2014). Discourse of the collective subject: social representations and communication interventions. Texto & Contexto - Enfermagem, 23(2), 502–507. https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-07072014000000014
Levesque, P., & Guillaume, A. (2010). Teachers, evolution, and religion: No resolution in sight. Review of Religious Research, 51(4), 349–365. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20778528
Losh, S. C., & Nzekwe, B. (2011). Creatures in the classroom: Preservice teacher beliefs about fantastic beasts, magic, extraterrestrials, evolution and creationism. Science & Education, 20(5–6), 473–489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-010-9268-5
Lovejoy, C. O. (1981). The origin of man. Science, 211(4480), 341–350. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.211.4480.341
Mayr, E. (1974). Teleological and Teleonomic, a New Analysis. In R. S. Cohen & M. W. Wartofsky (Eds.), Methodological and Historical Essays in the Natural and Social Sciences (Vol 14, pp. 91–117). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2128-9_6
McGhee, G. R. (2016). Can evolution be directional without being teleological? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 58, 93–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2015.12.006
Medel, R., & Veloso, A. (2009). Establecimiento y propagación del Darwinismo en Chile: Recepción y elaboración de las ideas. Gayana (Concepción), 73(1), 7–18. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-65382009000300002
Michaels, R. A., Hammerman, R. A., & Silva, H. M. (2018). Emerging green synergy in the science/religion relationship: From conflict to potentially planet-saving cooperation. Environmental Claims Journal, 30(4), 314–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/10406026.2018.1504381
Miller, J. D. (2006). Science Communication: Public acceptance of evolution. Science, 313(5788), 765–766. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1126746
Nehm, R. H., & Reilly, L. (2007). Biology majors’ knowledge and misconceptions of natural selection. BioScience, 57(3), 263–272. https://doi.org/10.1641/B570311
Oleques, L. C., Bartholomei-Santos, M. L., & Boer, e N. (2011). Evolução biológica: percepções de professores de biologia. Revista Electrónica de Enseñanza de Las Ciencias, 10(2), 243–263. http://reec.uvigo.es/volumenes/volumen10/ART2_VOL10_N2.pdf
Oliveira, G. da S., & Bizzo, N. (2011). Aceitação da evolução biológica: atitudes de estudantes do ensino médio de duas regiões brasileiras. Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa Em Educação Em Ciências, 11(1), 57–79. https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/rbpec/article/view/4124
Oro, A. P. (2008). Religião, coesão social e sistema político na América Latina. iFHC/CIEPLAN.
Oser, F. K., Fetz, R. L., Reich, K. H., & Valentin, P. (2003). Religious judgement and religious world view: Theoretical relationship and empirical findings. Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 25(1), 165–179. https://doi.org/10.1163/157361203X00129
Paley, W. (2012). Natural Theology: Or, evidences of the existence and attributes of the deity, collected from the appearances of nature. Suzeteo Enterprises.
Pedersen, S., & Halldén, O. (1994). Intuitive ideas and scientific explanations as parts of students’ developing understanding of biology: The case of evolution. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 9(2), 127–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173548
Pennock, R. T. (2001). Intelligent design creationism and its critics: Philosophical, theological, and scientific perspectives (R. T. Pennock (ed.)). MIT Press.
Pérez, G., Gómez Galindo, A. A., & González Galli, L. (2021). The regulation of epistemological obstacles in the learning of evolution. Enseñanza de Las Ciencias. Revista de Investigación y Experiencias Didácticas, 39(1), 27–44. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensciencias.2968
Pigliucci, M. (2009). Is intelligent design creationism? In K. Frazier (Ed.), Science Under Siege: Defending Science, Exposing Pseudoscience. Prometheus.
Prüfer, K., Munch, K., Hellmann, I., Akagi, K., Miller, J. R., Walenz, B., Koren, S., Sutton, G., Kodira, C., Winer, R., Knight, J. R., Mullikin, J. C., Meader, S. J., Ponting, C. P., Lunter, G., Higashino, S., Hobolth, A., Dutheil, J., Karakoç, E., … Pääbo, S. (2012). The bonobo genome compared with the chimpanzee and human genomes. Nature, 486(7404), 527–531. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11128
Reda, S. (2016). Collaborative inquiry in ontario’s kindergarten program. The International Journal of Holistic Early Learning and Development, 3(1), 72–77. https://ijheld.lakeheadu.ca/article/view/1502/834
Reiss, M. J. (2009). The relationship between evolutionary biology and religion. Evolution, 63(7), 1934–1941. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00714.x
Ribeiro, M. G. L., Larentis, A. L., Caldas, L. A., Garcia, T. C., Terra, L. L., Herbst, M. H., & Almeida, R. V. (2015). On the debate about teleology in biology: the notion of “teleological obstacle.” História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos, 22(4), 1321–1333. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-59702015005000003
Ruiz, R. (1987). Positivismo y evolucion: introduccion del darwinismo en Mexico. Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico.
Ruiz, Rosaura. (1987). Resistencia a Darwin en Mexico: El caso de la biologia. Omnia, 3(6), 51–57. http://poseidon.posgrado.unam.mx/publicaciones/ant_omnia/06/08.pdf
Ruse, M. (2000). Teleology: yesterday, today, and tomorrow? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 31(1), 213–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-8486(99)00046-1
Scott, E. C., & Matzke, N. J. (2007). Biological design in science classrooms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(Supplement 1), 8669–8676. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0701505104
Shanks, N. (2004). God, the devil, and Darwin: A critique of intelligent design theory. Oxford University Press.
Silva, H. M. (2015). Professores de Biologia e Ensino de Evolução: Uma perspectiva comparativa em países com contraste de relação entre Estado e Igreja na América Latina. (Doctoral Dissertation) [Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte]. http://hdl.handle.net/1843/BUBD-A3HFBJ
Silva, H. M. (2017). Intelligent design endangers education. Science, 357(6354), 880.1-880. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao3245
Silva, H. M., Carvalho, G. S., Silva, P. R., & Gibram, D. E. (2016). A percepção sobre a hipótese do design inteligente no Brasil (Minas Gerais). Conexão Ciência (Online), 11(1), 61–71. https://doi.org/10.24862/cco.v11i1.273
Silva, H. M., Oliveira, A. W., Belloso, G. V., Díaz, M. A., & Carvalho, G. S. (2021). Biology teachers’ conceptions of Humankind Origin across secular and religious countries: an international comparison. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 14(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12052-020-00141-9
Skrzypi„ska, K. (2014). The Threefold Nature of Spirituality (TNS) in a psychological cognitive framework. Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 36(3), 277–302. https://doi.org/10.1163/15736121-12341293
Smith, C., & Prokopy, J. (1999). Latin American religion in motion. Routledge.
Stover, S. K., & Mabry, M. L. (2007). Influences of teleological and lamarckian thinking on student understanding of natural selection. Bioscene: The Journal Of College Biology Teaching, 33, 11–18. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ849534.pdf
Taber, K. S. (2013). Conceptual frameworks, metaphysical commitments and worldviews: The challenge of reflecting the relationships between science and religion in science education. In N.
Mansour & R. Wegerif (Eds.), Science Education for Diversity: Theory and Practice (pp. 151–177). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4563-6_8
Tamir, P. (1985). Causality and teleology in high school biology. Research in Science & Technological Education, 3(1), 19–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/0263514850030103
Tamir, P., & Zohar, A. (1991). Anthropomorphism and teleology in reasoning about biological phenomena. Science Education, 75(1), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730750106
Teixeira, P. M. M., & Neto, e J. M. (2012). O estado da arte da pesquisa em ensino de Biologia no Brasil: um panorama baseado na análise de dissertações e teses. Revista Electrónica de Enseñanza de Las Ciencias, 11(2), 273–297. http://reec.uvigo.es/volumenes/volumen11/REEC_11_2_2_ex500.pdf
Woodford, P. (2016). Neo-Darwinists and Neo-Aristotelians: How to talk about natural purpose. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 38(4), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-016-0123-0
Zohar, A., & Ginossar, S. (1998). Lifting the taboo regarding teleology and anthropomorphism in biology education?Heretical suggestions. Science Education, 82(6), 679–697. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199811)82:6<679::AID-SCE3>3.0.CO;2-E
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with Jurnal Bioedukatika agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
