Students argumentation quality and argumentation skill biology education student
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26555/bioedukatika.v9i2.20675Keywords:
ADI, Learning strategy, Quality, RQA, RQA integrated with ADIAbstract
The ability to give arguments is very essential for students in order that they can take more roles in various aspects of life. The quality of students' arguments can be reflected in their ability to accommodate higher-order thinking skills to generate an argument. This study aims at analyzing students ability to make arguments and the quality of their arguments after the implementation of Reading, Questioning and Answering (RQA), ADI (Argument-Driven Inquiry), RQA integrated with ADI, and conventional learning strategies. This research is a survey research using a descriptive quantitative approach. The subjects of this research were the Biology Education students of UIN Alauddin Makassar and Universitas Muslim Maros, South Sulawesi, consisting of 92 students. The collected data were in the form of students argumentation skill data obtained from the observation sheets in each class through the implementation of RQA strategy, ADI strategy, RQA integrated with ADI strategy, and conventional learning strategy on animals Physiology learning. The results of this research showed that the quality of students' arguments at the implementation of RQA, ADI, RQA integrated with ADI learning strategies was at the level of application, analysis, evaluation, and creation, while at the implementation of conventional learning their argumentation quality was at the level of memorizing and understanding.
References
Acar, Ö., Patton, B., & White, A. (2015). Prospective secondary science teachers’ argumentation skills and the interaction of these skills with their conceptual knowledge. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(9), 132–156. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2015v40n9.8
Addy, T. M., LePrevost, C., & Stevenson, M. (2014). Thinking critically in undergraduate biology: Flipping the classroom and problem-based learning. Double Helix: A Journal of Critical Thinking and Writing, 2(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.37514/DBH-J.2014.2.1.09
Aloysius, D. C. (2009). Pengalaman berupaya menjadi guru profesional. http://library.um.ac.id
Amin, A. M. (2016). Persepsi mahasiswa terhadap strategi Reading, Questioning, and Answering (RQA) dan Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI). Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 8(1), 1–9. http://journal2.um.ac.id/index.php/jpb/article/view/2271
Amin, A. M., & Adiansyah, R. (2018a). Lecturers’ perception on students’ critical thinking skills development and problems faced by students in developing their critical thinking skills. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia, 4(1), 1–10.
https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v4i1.5181
Amin, A. M., & Adiansyah, R. (2020). Identification of preservice biology teachers’ metacognitive awareness and metacognitive skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1511, 012029. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1511/1/012029
Amin, A. M., & Adiansyah, R. (2018b). Lecturers’ perceptions of the empowerment of students’ argumentation skill and the challenges of teaching the skill to students. Proceeding of 5 ThICRIEMS Proceedings, 111–116. http://seminar.uny.ac.id/icriems
Amin, A. M., & Aloysius, D. C. (2016). Analisis persepsi dosen terhadap strategi pembelajaran Reading Questiong and Answering (RQA) dan Argument Driven Inquiry (ADI) pada program studi pendidikan biologi di kota Makassar. Prosiding Seminar Nasional II, 333–347.
Amin, A. M., Corebima, A. D., Zubaidah, S., & Mahanal, S. (2017). Identifikasi kemampuan bertanya dan berpendapat calon guru biologi pada mata kuliah fisiologi hewan. BIOEDUKASI: Jurnal Biologi Dan Pembelajarannya, 15(1), 24–31. https://doi.org/10.19184/bioedu.v15i1.4704
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: a revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
Andriani, Y., & Riandi, R. (2015). Perbandingan aktifitas siswa dan guru dalam pembelajaran Argument Driven Inquiry dan Inkuiri Terbimbing pada pembelajaran IPA terpadu kelas VII. Prosiding Simposium Nasional Inovasi Dan Pembelajaran Sains (SNIPS 2015), 589–592. https://ifory.id/abstract/PDcV2MBGhf48
Antony, M. M., & Swinson, R. P. (2017). The shyness and social anxiety workbook: Proven, step-by-step techniques for overcoming your fear (Third). New Harbinger Publication, Inc.
Asniar, A. (2016). Profil penalaran ilmiah dan kemampuan berargumentasi mahasiswa sains dan non-sains. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran IPA, 2(1), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.30870/jppi.v2i1.428
Barrie, S. C. (2007). A conceptual framework for the teaching and learning of generic graduate attributes. Studies in Higher Education, 32(4), 439–458. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070701476100
BouJaoude, S., & Attieh, M. (2008). The effect of using concept maps as study tools on achievement in chemistry. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 4(3), 233–246. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75345
Brookhart, S. M. (2010). How to assess higher-order thinking skills in your classroom. ASCD.
Bustami, Y., Suarsini, E., & Ibrohim, I. (2019). Profil keterampilan berpikir kritis mahasiswa dalam perkuliahan zoologi. JURNAL BIOEDUKATIKA, 7(1), 59–66. https://doi.org/10.26555/bioedukatika.v7i1.9965
Christenson, N., Gericke, N., & Rundgren, S.-N. C. (2017). Science and language teachers’ assessment of upper secondary students’ socioscientific argumentation. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(8), 1403–1422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9746-6
Deane, P., & Song, Y. (2014). A case study in principled assessment design: Designing assessments to measure and support the development of argumentative reading and writing skills. Psicología Educativa, 20(2), 99–108. https://journals.copmadrid.org/psed/archivos/ed2014v20n2a5.pdf
Dwiretno, G., & Setyarsih, W. (2018). Pembelajaran fisika menggunakan model Argument Driven Inquiry (ADI) untuk melatihkan kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah peserta didik. Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika, 7(2), 337–340. https://jurnalmahasiswa.unesa.ac.id/index.php/5/article/view/24505
Idrus, M. (2009). Kompetensi interpersonal mahasiswa. Unisia, 32(72), 171–184. https://doi.org/10.20885/unisia.vol32.iss72.art5
Istiana, R., Herawati, D., & Ardianto, D. (2020). Argumentation real-world inquiry to improve students’ argumentation skill. JURNAL BIOEDUKATIKA, 8(2), 131–140. https://doi.org/10.26555/bioedukatika.v8i2.12705
Istiyono, E., Mardapi, D., & Suparno, S. (2014). Pengembangan tes kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi fisika (PysTHOTS) peserta didik SMA. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 18(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v18i1.2120
Kadayifci, H., & Yalcin-Celik, A. (2016). Implementation of Argument-Driven Inquiry as an instructional model in a general chemistry laboratory course. Science Education International, 27(3), 369–390. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1118430
Karmi, K. (2019). The EFL teacher: A cultural mediator and a facilitator. Journal of Education and Practice, 10(17), 61–64. https://doi.org/10.7176/JEP/10-17-09
Keraf, G. (2007). Argumentasi dan narasi: Komposisi lanjutan III. Gramedia.
Kim, H., & Song, J. (2006). The features of peer argumentation in middle school students’ scientific inquiry. Research in Science Education, 36(3), 211–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-005-9005-2
Kolstø, S. D., & Ratcliffe, M. (2007). Social aspects of argumentation. In S. Erduran & M. P. Jiménez-Aleixandre (Eds.), Argumentation in Science Education (Vol. 35, pp. 117–136). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6670-2_6
Kuhn, D., Hemberger, L., & Khait, V. (2017). Argue with Me. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315692722
Kurniasari, I. S., & Setyarsih, W. (2017). Penerapan model pembelajaran Argument Driven Inquiry (ADI) untuk melatihkan kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah siswa pada materi usaha dan energi. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika, 6(3), 171–174. https://jurnalmahasiswa.unesa.ac.id/index.php/5/article/view/20276
Lateef, A., Dahar, M. A., & Latif, K. (2016). Impact of higher order thinking skills of University students on their academic performance. Pakistan Association of Anthropology, 28(2), 2031–2035.
Leitão, S. (2000). The potential of argument in knowledge building. Human Development, 43(6), 332–360. https://doi.org/10.1159/000022695
Litman, C., & Greenleaf, C. (2018). Argumentation tasks in secondary english language arts, history, and science: Variations in instructional focus and inquiry space. Reading Research Quarterly, 53(1), 107–126. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.187
Marhamah, O. S., Nurlaelah, I., & Setiawati, I. (2017). Penerapan model Argument Driven Inquiry (ADI) dalam meningkatkan kemampuan berargumentasi siswa pada konsep pencemaran lingkungan di kelas X SMA Negeri 1 Ciawigebang. Quagga : Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Biologi, 9(2), 39–45. https://doi.org/10.25134/quagga.v9i02.747
McNeill, K. L., Singer, R. K., Howard, M. G., & Loper, S. (2016). Factors impacting teachers’ argumentation instruction in their science classrooms. International Journal of Science Education, 38(12), 2026–2046. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1221547
Muhajir, S. N., Oktaviani, V., Yuningsih, E. K., & Mulhayatiah, D. (2016). Profil keterampilan argumentasi ilmiah mahasiswa pendidikan fisika dengan bantuan ICT. Prosiding Seminar Kontribusi Fisika 2016, 447–450. https://ifory.id/proceedings
Nasrudin, H., & Azizah, U. (2019). Reading, Questioning, and Answering (RQA) strategies’: An alternative to empowering undergraduate student thinking abilities. Proceedings of the National Seminar on Chemistry 2019 (SNK-19). https://doi.org/10.2991/snk-19.2019.32
Nasution, E. S. (2019). Peningkatan keterampilan berargumentasi ilmiah pada siswa melalui model pembelajaran Argument- Driven Inquiry (ADI). JURNAL EKSAKTA PENDIDIKAN (JEP), 3(2), 100–108. https://doi.org/10.24036/jep/vol3-iss2/375
Osborne, J. (2010). Arguing to learn in science: The role of collaborative, critical discourse. Science, 328(5977), 463–466. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1183944
Priantari, I., & Nurmala, R. S. (2016). Penerapan pembelajaran RQA dipadu TPS untuk meningkatkan aktivitas belajar mahasiswa. BIOMA: Jurnal Biologi Dan Pembelajaran Biologi, 1(2), 162–176. http://jurnal.unmuhjember.ac.id/index.php/BIOMA/article/view/445
Probosari, R. M., Ramli, M., Harlita, H., Indrowati, M., & Sajidan, S. (2016). Profil keterampilan argumentasi ilmiah mahasiswa pendidikan biologi FKIP UNS pada mata kuliah anatomi tumbuhan. Bioedukasi: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 8(2), 29–33. https://doi.org/10.20961/bioedukasi-uns.v9i1.3880
Sharbinie, U. ., & Agus, S. (2006). Seni berbicara di depan publik bebas rasa takut. EDSA Mahkota.
Shin, N., Jonassen, D. H., & McGee, S. (2003). Predictors of well-structured and ill-structured problem solving in an astronomy simulation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(1), 6–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10058
Sockalingam, N., & Schmidt, H. G. (2011). Characteristics of problems for Problem-Based Learning: The students’ perspective. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 5(1), 6–33. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1135
Sugiyanto, R. (2009). Penerapan metode bertanya dalam kegiatan praktek lapangan untuk meningkatkan kemampuan mengemukakan pendapat mahasiswa. Jurnal Geografi: Media Informasi Pengembangan Dan Profesi Kegeografian, 6(2), 80–90. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/JG/article/view/94
Sumampouw, H. M. (2011). Keterampilan metakognitif dan berpikir tingkat tinggi dalam pembelajaran Genetika (Artikulasi konsep dan verifikasi empiris). BIOEDUKASI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi), 4(2), 23–39. https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/bioedukasi/article/view/2632
Syaifudin, A., & Sulistyaningrum, S. (2015). Peningkatan kemampuan berpendapat mahasiswa melalui Problem Based Learning (PBL) sebagai pendukung pencapaian Kerangka Kualifikasi Nasional Indonesia (KKNI) pada mata Kuliah pragmatik. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 32(2), 97–106. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/JPP/article/view/5055
Thomas, R., Dougherty, M. R., & Buttaccio, D. R. (2014). Memory constraints on hypothesis generation and decision making. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(4), 264–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414534853
Toyep, M., Prabowo, P., & Kardi, S. (2015). Profil keterampilan argumentasi siswa SMAN 2 Sampit dalam menyelesaikan masalah fisika. ProsedingSeminarNasionalFisika Dan Aplikasinya, 131–136.
Vogel, F., Kollar, I., Ufer, S., Reichersdorfer, E., Reiss, K., & Fischer, F. (2016). Developing argumentation skills in mathematics through computer-supported collaborative learning: the role of transactivity. Instructional Science, 44(5), 477–500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-016-9380-2
Waterman, S. (2013). The effects of brainscape’s confidence-based repition on two adults’ performance on knowledge-based quizzes. http://hdl.handle.net/1951/63066
Wicaksono, A. G. C., & Hayat, M. S. (2016). Kualitas argumentasi mahasiswa calon guru pada diskusi pengembangan kurikulum IPA. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Sains Dan Entrepreneurship III Tahun 2016. http://prosiding.upgris.ac.id/index.php/snse/snse/paper/view/988
Wiley, D. (2006). Scalability and sociability in online learning environments. In H. F. O’Neil & R. S. Perez (Eds.), Web-based learning: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 295–306). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Wink, D. J. (2010). Philosophical, cognitive, and sociological roots for connections in chemistry teaching and learning. In S. Basu-Dutt (Ed.), Making chemistry relevant: Strategies for including all students in a learner-sensitive classroom environment (pp. 1–26). John Wiley & Sons.
Woolfolk, A. (2020). Educational psychology: Active learning edition (14th ed.). Pearson Education Inc.
Yasir, M., Wulandari, A. Y. R., Qomaria, N., Prahani, B. K., & Al Haq, A. T. (2020). The contribution of local wisdom integrated science learning model to the students’ scientific communication skill on ecology learning. JURNAL BIOEDUKATIKA, 8(3), 141–156. https://doi.org/10.26555/bioedukatika.v8i3.15015
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with Jurnal Bioedukatika agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
