TPACK perception analysis of teachers in facing 21st-century learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26555/bioedukatika.v9i2.17788Keywords:
Perceptions, TPACK, Consideration, Survey, 21st-Century LearningAbstract
This study aims to analyze and identify teachers 'perceptions of TPACK that can influence teachers' knowledge and understanding of 21st-century learning. The research method used in this research is the survey method with a cross-sectional research design. The research subjects consisted of 25 biology teachers with different teaching experiences ranging from learning experience ages less than 5 years to more than 15. The results showed that biology teachers with TPACK perceptions were quite good. Teachers 'perceptions of 21st-century learning are constrained by aspects of understanding students' abilities on creativity and critical thinking indicators. The consideration of teaching according to the skills demands of the 21st century is quite good. Teachers with low teaching experience still have less understanding of the latest learning technology. Each range of teacher teaching experiences has different abilities and perceptions and considerations of 21st-century learning that can become the foundation of teachers in implementing learning in the 21st century that puts forward the 4Cs aspect.
References
Adiyanta, F. C. S. (2019). Hukum dan studi penelitian empiris: Penggunaan metode survey sebagai instrumen penelitian hukum empiris. Administrative Law and Governance Journal, 2(4), 697–709. https://doi.org/10.14710/alj.v2i4.697-709
Aini, S. N., & Sudira, P. (2015). Pengaruh strategi pembelajaran, gaya belajar, sarana praktik, dan media terhadap hasil belajar patiseri SMK se-Gerbangkertasusila. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 5(1), 88–102. https://doi.org/10.21831/JPV.V5I1.6077
Chapoo, S., Thathong, K., & Halim, L. (2014). Understanding biology teacher’s pedagogical content knowledge for teaching “the nature of organism.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 464–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.241
Hidayah, R., Salimi, M., & Susiani, T. S. (2017). Critical thinking skill: Konsep dan inidikator penilaian. Taman Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Ke-SD-An, 1(2), 127–133. https://doi.org/10.30738/TC.V1I2.1945
Kartal, T., Ozturk, N., & Ekici, G. (2012). Developing pedagogical content knowledge in preservice science teachers through microteaching lesson study. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 2753–2758.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.560
Kind, V. (2014). Science teachers’ content knowledge. In H. Venkat, M. Rollnick, J. Loughran, & M. Askew (Eds.), Exploring Mathematics and Science Teachers’ Knowledge (1st ed.). Routledge.
Maba, W. (2017). Teacher’s perception on the implementation of the assessment process in 2013 curriculum. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.29332/ijssh.v1n2.26
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1467-9620.2006.00684.X
Mulhall, P. J., Berry, A., & Loughran, J. (2003). Frameworks for representing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 4(2), 1–25. https://www.eduhk.hk/apfslt/download/v4_issue2_files/mulhall.pdf
Mulyasa. (2009). Standar kompetensi dan sertifikasi guru (1st ed.). PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Nasution, W. R., Sriyati, S., Riandi, R., & Safitri, M. (2017). Mastery of Content Representation (CoRes) Related TPACK High School Biology Teacher. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 895(1), 012125. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/895/1/012125
NCREL, & Metiri Group. (2003). enGauge 21st century skills: Literacy in the digital age. North Central Regional Educational Laboratory, Metiri Group.
Nurhayati B. (2006). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi profesionalisme dan kinerja guru biologi di SMAN Kota Makassar Sulawesi Selatan. Mimbar Pendidikan, 25(4), 64–70. http://file.upi.edu
P21. (2007). The intellectual and policy foundations of the 21st century skills framework. Partnership for 21st Century Skills.
Rahmadhani, Y., Rahmat, A., & Purwianingsih, W. (2016). Pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) guru dalam pembelajaran biologi SMA di Kota Cimahi. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Sains Dan Pendidikan Sains, 17–24.
Raja, R., & Nagasubramani, P. C. (2018). Impact of modern technology in education. Journal of Applied and Advanced Research, 3(1), S33–S35. https://doi.org/10.21839/jaar.2018.v3iS1.165
Redecker, C., Leis, M., Leendertse, M., Punie, Y., Gijsbers, G., Kirschner, P., Stoyanov, S., & Hoogveld, B. (2011). The future of learning : preparing for change. Publications Office of the European Union.
Riandi. (2015). The development of geneTIK as an integrated technology, pedagogy and content knowledge (TPACK) on genetic course for biology education student. International Seminar on Mathematics, Science, and Computer Science Education, 685–691.
Riandi, R., Apriliana, V., & Purwianingsih, W. (2018). The analysis of 21st century teachers’ ability in technological pedagogical content knowledge. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Education Innovation (ICEI 2018). https://doi.org/10.2991/icei-18.2018.60
Russell, M., Bebell, D., O’Dwyer, L., & O’Connor, K. (2003). Examining teacher technology use. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(4), 297–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487103255985
Shing, C. L., Saat, R. M., & Loke, S. H. (2015). The knowledge of Teaching- Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK). MOJES: The Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 3(3), 40–55. https://mojes.um.edu.my/index.php/MOJES/article/view/12781
Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
Smerdon, B., Cronen, S., Lanahan, L., Anderson, J., Lannotti, N., & Angeles, J. (2000). Teachers’ tools for the 21st century: A report on teachers’ use of technology. In Elementary and Secondary Education. U.S. Department of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2000/2000102.pdf
The Partnership for 21st century skills. (2008). 21st century skills, education & competitiveness: A resource and policy guide. Partnership for 21st Century Skills, 1–20. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED519337.pdf
Tsai, H.-C. (2015). A senior teacher’s implementation of technology integration. International Education Studies, 8(6), 151–161. https://doi.org/10.5539/IES.V8N6P151
Turiman, P., Omar, J., Daud, A. M., & Osman, K. (2012). Fostering the 21st century skills through scientific literacy and science process skills. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 110–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.253
Van Driel, J. H., & Berry, A. (2012). Teacher professional development focusing on pedagogical content knowledge. Educational Researcher, 41(1), 26–28. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X11431010
Zubaidah, S. (2016). Keterampilan abad ke-21: Keterampilan yang diajarkan melalui pembelajaran. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Dengan Tema “Isu-Isu Strategis Pembelajaran MIPA Abad 21, 1–17.
Zubaidah, S., Fuad, N. M., Mahanal, S., & Suarsini, E. (2017). Improving creative thinking skills of students through differentiated science inquiry integrated with mind map. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 14(4), 77–91. http://www.tused.org/index.php/tused/article/view/175/131
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with Jurnal Bioedukatika agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
