The Manifestation of Indonesian Democracy; Between Pancasila State of Law and Islamic Nomocracy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26555/novelty.v9i2.a11517Keywords:
State of law, Pancasila, Islamic Nomocracy, DemocracyAbstract
The state of Pancasila law is a tool for people who have the power to regulate human relations in society and regulate the symptoms of power in society. As a country with the largest Muslim population in the world, Indonesia does not make Islam its legal basis. The Islamic Nomocracy and its values are embedded in the state of Pancasila law, as well as manifestation of democracy itself. Through these hyphoteses, the writer tries to find a common flateform between Pancasila and the Islamic Nomocracy in the formation of Indonesian democracy. This classic problem requires special attention, because the debate always triggers reactions and actions. Islam as a religion with complex system of living is believed to be a powerful mechanism in dealing with various life problems encountered. The Shari’ah consists of a combination of pre-Islamic customs and habits with principles and laws originated from the Qur’an and authentic prophetic tradition. Islamic scholars try to form Islamic teachings as ethical and national policies. Even so, the principle of the Pancasila state was accepted as final, at least there were Islamic nomocracy values embedded in the Pancasila while at the same time they contributed to build Indonesia’s democracy as a modern country. The theological values in the Pancasila and islamic nomocracy should not be a mere formal rule, but should address the substance of democracy in Indonesia. The rule of law must be supported by a democratic system because there is a clear correlation between the rule of law which relies on the constitution, and the sovereignty of the people which is carried out through a democratic system. In a democratic system, people’s participation is the essence of this system. However, democracy without legal regulation will lose form and direction, while law without democracy will lose meaning.References
Al-Atok, A. R. (2016). Negara Hukum Indonesia. Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang.
Asshiddiqie, J. (2008). Pokok-Pokok Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia Pasca Reformasi. Jakarta: Bhuana Ilmu Populer.
Asshiddiqie, J. (2010). Konstitusi & Konstitusionalisme Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Azhari, M. T. (2015). Negara Hukum: Suatu Studi Tentang Prinsip-Prinsipnya Dilihat Dari Segi Hukum Islam Pada Periode Negara Madinah dan Masa Kini. Jakarta: Kencana.
Chandranegara, I. S. (2015). Fungsi Falsafah Negara Dalam Penerapan Konsep Negara Hukum. Jurnal Cita Hukum, 1(1).
Dayanto. (2013). Rekonstruksi Paradigma Pembangunan Negara Hukum Indonesia. Jurnal Dinam, 13(3), 498–509.
Djafar, W. (2010). Menegaskan Kembali Komitmen Negara Hukum: Sebuah Catatan atas Kecenderungan Defisit Negara Hukum di Indonesia. Jurnal Konstitusi, 7(5), 151–174.
Effendi, M. (2005). Kejaksaan RI: Posisi dan Fungsinya Dari Perspektif Hukum. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Fuady, M. (2009). Teori Negara Hukum Modern (Rechtstaat). Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Hakim, L. (2010). Kedududkan Hukum Komisi Negara di Indonesia: Eksistensi Komisi-Komisi Negara (State Auxiliary Agency) Sebagai Organ Negara yang Mandiri Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan. Malang: PPS Universitas Brawijaya.
Mahendra, Y. I. (1996). Dinamika Tata Negara Indonesia; Konfilasi Aktual Masalah Konstitusi Dewan Perwakilan dan Sistem Kepartaian. Jakarta: Gema Insani.
Mahfud MD, M. (2010). Konstitusi dan Hukum Dalam Kontroversi Isu. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
Manan, B., & Magnar, K. (1993). Beberapa Masalah Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia. Bandung: Alumni.
Muntoha. (2009). Demokrasi dan Negara Hukum. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 16(3), 379–395.
Nurita, R. F. (2015). Kajian Filsafat Hukum Tentang Demokrasi Di Indonesia. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 6(1), 89–98.
Putra, I. K. C. (2017). Relevansi Konsep Negara Hukum Pancasila dengan Welfare State dalam Implementasinya dengan Pelayanan Publik di Indonesia. Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana, 6(1), 1–12.
Rahardjo, S. (2006). Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bhakti.
Sarip. (2018). Kebaruan dan Pembaharuan HukumPercepatan Ekonomi Digital Desa Dalam Bingkai Negara Hukum. Justitia Jurnal Hukum, 2(1), 1–17.
Sigit Riyanto. (2012). Kedaulatan Negara dalam Kerangka Hukum Internasional Kontemporer. Yustisia, 84(3), 5–14.
Soemarsono, M. (2007). Negara Hukum Indonesia Ditinjau Dari Sudut Teori Tujuan Negara. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 37(2), 300–322.
Syarkawi. (2012). Implementasi Musyawarah Menurut Nomokrasi Islam. Lentera, 12(1), 87–90.
Wahyono, P. (1986). Indonesia Negara berdasarkan Atas Hukum. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
Wijaya, M. H. (2015). Karakteristik Konsep Negara Hukum Pancasila. Jurnal Advokasi, 5(2), 199–214.
Yuli Isdiyanto, I. (2018). Problematika Teori Hukum, Konstruksi Hukum dan Kesadaran Sosial. Jurnal Hukum Novelty, 9(1), 54–69.
Zuhraini. (2014). Konstribusi Nomokrasi Islam (Rule of Islamic Law) Terhadap Negara Hukum Pancasila. Al-’Adalah, 12(1), 171–190.
