Legal protection of women’s and children's rights after divorce through the E-MOSI CAPER App
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26555/novelty.v15i1.a27347Keywords:
Rights, women, children, biological justice, E-MOSI CAPERAbstract
Introduction to the Problem: Women and children are frequently mistreated, particularly when they face legal issues. In divorce situations, for example, they often do not receive the entitlements to which they are entitled, such as mut'ah, iddah, and child support. This situation is due to the existing legal system and policies that do not reflect equality and justice for women and children, particularly in the execution of court orders carrying ex-husbands' obligations to their ex-wives. One of the legal advances in this part is using information and technology (IT) to develop a decision execution system. E-MOSI CAPER is one of the IT-based decision execution instruments that ex-wives can employ to demand that their ex-husbands voluntarily carry out the decision's obligations.
Purpose/Objective of the Study: This article attempts to describe and analyze how the E-MOSI CAPER App could assure the preservation of women's and children's rights after divorce.
Design/Methodology/Approach: This work adopts a qualitative research technique through normative and empirical juridical approaches, with statutory and conceptual approaches.
Findings: According to this study, the E-MOSI CAPER application, one of the IT-based services released by the Bengkulu Religious High Court, is an innovation that could be used as a tool in organizing guarantees for the protection of women's and children's rights. This App can increase the compliance of ex-husbands to perform court decisions, which makes this App part of the legal instrument of the Integrated Execution System.
Paper Type: Research Article
References
Afifah, W. (2017). Hukum dan Konstitusi: Perlindungan Hukum atas Diskriminasi Pada Hak Asasi Perempuan di dalam Konstitusi. DiH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 13(26), 201-216, https://doi.org/10.30996/dih.v0i0.1583.
Andriani et al. (2021). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Hak Nafkah Anak Pasca Perceraian Perspektif Hakim Pengadilan Agama Sungguminasa (Studi Atas Putusan Nomor 22/Pdt.G/2021/PA.Sgm). Qadauna: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Hukum Keluarga Islam, 3(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.24252/qadauna.v3i1.¬22499.
Apriliandra, S & Krisnani, H. (2021). Perilaku Diskriminatif pada Perempuan Akibat Kuatnya Budaya Patriarki di Indonesia Ditinjau dari Perspektif Konflik. Jurnal Kolaborasi Resolusi Konflik, 3(1), 1-13, https://doi.org/10.24198/jkrk.v3i1.¬31968.
Astuti, P., & Prastio, T. (2022). Post-Divorce Rights of Women and Children. MILRev : Metro Islamic Law Review, 1(2), 203-213. https://e-journal.metrouniv.ac.id-/index.php/milrev/article/¬view/6209.
Bangkulu Province. The Bengkulu Governor's Circular Nomor 800/1697/BKD/2021. Bengkulu: Bengkulu Province
Bengkulu Religious High Court. The Chairman of the Bengkulu Religious High Court's Decree Number: W7-A/2763/HM.02.3/11/2022. Bengkulu: Bengkulu Religious High Court
Benuf, K & Azhar, M. (2020). Legal Research Methodology as an Instrument to Analyze Contemporary Legal Issues. Gema Keadilan, 1(7), 20-33. https://doi.org/¬10.14710/gk.2020.7504 23-24.
CEDAW, C. o. (2021). General Recommendation No 33 on Women’s Access to Justice. Geneva: CEDAW UN.
Chiassoni, P. (2014). Kelsen on Natural Law Theory: An Enduring Critical Affair. Revus, (23), 135–163. https://doi.org/10.4000/revus.2976.
Dalila, B. et al. (2023). Tanggung Jawab Pegawai Negeri Sipil Terhadap Pemberian Nafkah Kepada Bekas Isteri dan Anaknya: (Suatu Kajian di Kabupaten Bireuen). Jurnal Al-Mizan, 10(1), 27-46. https://doi.org/10.54621/jiam.-v10i1.589.
Darmawan el al. (2023). Relative Competence of the Sharia Court: Talaq Divorce Lawsuit and Protection of Women’s Rights. Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam, 7(1), 84-100. http://dx.doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v7i1.16053.
Febriani, I & Murty, T. (2021). Analisis Muatan Nilai Keadilan. Repertorium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Kenotariatan, 10(2), 187-207. http://dx.doi.org/10.28946/-rpt.v10i2.1577.
Fitri et al. (2023). Efektivitas Pemenuhan Hak-Hak Perempuan dan Anak Pasca Perceraian Studi di Pengadilan Agama Takalar Kelas II. Journal of Lex Generalis (JLG), 4(2), 494-518. https://pasca-umi.ac.id/index.php/jlg/article/view/¬1376.
Fitriani, R el al. (2023). Legal Protection for Wife and Child as Consequence of Head of Family’s Criminal Imprisonment Enforcement. Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi, 6(1),77–88. https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v6i1.8232.
Helmi, M. (2015). Konsep Keadilan Dalam Filsafat Hukum Dan Filsafat Hukum Islam. Mazahib, 14(2), 133-144. https://doi.org/10.21093/mj.v14i2.342.
Jamil. (2014). Izin Perkawinan Dan Perceraian Bagi Pns (Suatu Analisis Hukum Islam terhadap PP No.10/1983 - Jo PP 45/1990. Jurnal Al-Qadau: Peradilan Dan Hukum Keluarga Islam, 1(2), 10-18. https://doi.org/10.24252/al-qadau.-v1i2.636.
Kamurudin, A. (2019). Nafkah Anak Pasca Penceraian Studi Perbandingan di Lembaga Peradilan Indonesia dan Malaysia. Sakina: Journal of Family Studies, 3(4), 1-14. http://urj.uin-malang.ac.id/index.php/jfs/article/view/303.
KemenPPA (2017, 04 01). Press Release of the Ministry of Women's Empowerment and Child Protection. Retrieved from Protection of Women Makes Indonesia Great, Siaran Pers Nomor: B-024/Set/Rokum/MP 01/04/2017: https://www.kemenpppa.go.id/index.php/page/read/29/1390/perlindungan-kaum-perempuan-wujudkan-indonesia-hebat
Kurniawan, M. B. (2018). Pembagian harta bersama ditinjau dari besaran kontribusi suami istri dalam perkawinan: Kajian Putusan Nomor 618/PDT.G/2012/PA.BKT. Jurnal Yudisial, 11(1), 41-53, http://dx.doi.org/-10.29123/jy.v11i1.224.
Kurniawan, M. B. (2020). Implementation of Electronic Trial (E-Litigation) on The Civil Cases in Indonesia Court as a Legal Renewal Of Civil Procedural Law. JHP: Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 9(1), 43-70, http://dx.doi.org/10.25216/-jhp.9.1.2020.43-70.
Mukhlishin & Sarip . (2020). Keadilan dan Kepastian Hukum: Menyoal Konsep Keadilan Hukum Hans Kelsen Perspektif “Al-‘Adl” dalam Al-Qur’An. Media Keadilan: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 11(1), 55-75. https://doi.org/10.31764/-jmk.v11i1.1954.
Nabiila, R. & Irawan, F.P.P. . (2022). Respon Hukum Nasional terhadap Perubahan Sosial Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19 di Indonesia. MORALITY: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 8(2), 127-140. http://dx.doi.org/10.52947/morality.v8i2.258 .
Nasution, B. J. (2014). Kajian Filosofis tentang Konsep Keadilan dari Pemikiran Klasik sampai Pemikiran Modern. Yustisia, 3(2), 118-129. https://doi.org/10.20961¬/yustisia.v3i2.11106.
Nasution, H. (2020). Access to Justice for Women and Children in Divorce Cases in the Indonesian Religious Courts. Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, 20(2), 361-384. 10.15408/ajis.v20i2.15702.
Nozick, R. (1980). Anarchy, State and Utopia. London: Oxford Blackwell.
Palupi, A.M. et al. (2021). Implementasi Prinsip Mempersulit Perceraian dalam Undang-Undang Perkawinan: Studi Kasus di Pengadilan Agama Kota Semarang. Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Islam, 5(1), 1-15. https://jhei.appheisi.or.id/index.php/jhei/article/view/71.
Paramita, A. D. ., & Ahmad, M. J. (2022). Ak Nafkah Bekas Istri Pns setelah Perceraian Ditinjau dari Pp No 10 Tahun 1983 Jo. Pp No.45 Tahun 1990 Dan Kompilasi Hukum Islam. Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance, 2(2), 603–617. https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.-v2i2.91.
PTA Bengkulu. (2022). Manual Book Aplikasi E-MOSI CAPER. Bengkulu: PTA Bengkulu.
Salma el al. (2017). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Perempuan Dan Anak (Analisis Putusan Hakim Tentang Nafkah Madhiyah Pada Pengadilan Agama Di Sumatera Barat). Istinbath, 16(1), 106-208. https://doi.org/10.20414/-ijhi.v16i1.77.
Santoso. (2016). Hakekat Perkawinan Menurut Undang-Undang Perkawinan, Hukum Islam dan Hukum Adat. Jurnal Yudisia, 7(2), 412-434, http://dx.doi.org/-10.21043/yudisia.-v7i2.2162.
Saraswati, R. (2021). Gender Bias in Indonesian Courts: Is Perma No. 3 of 2017 the Solution for Gender-Based Violence Cases?. Laws 2021, 10(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws10010002.
Sepma, A., & Erwita, Y. (2020). Pemberian Hak Nafkah Anak Pasca Perceraian di Pengadilan Agama Jambi. Zaaken: Journal of Civil and Business Law, 1(2), 344-358. https://doi.org/10.22437/zaaken.v1i2.9434.
Shidarta. (2013). Konsep ‘Malum In Se’ dan ‘Malum Prohibitum’ dalam Filosofi Pemberantasan Korupsi. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 42(1), 88-96. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.42.1.2013.88-96.
Sholeh, A. et al. (2019). Pendampingan Hak-Hak Perempuan Dan Anak Pasca Perceraian. JCIC: Jurnal CIC Lembaga Riset Dan Konsultan Sosial, 1(2), 80-99. https://doi.org/10.51486/jbo.v1i2.19.
Sidiq, U & Choiri, M. (2019). Qualitative Research Methods in Education. Ponorogo: CV. Natakarya.
Siska et al. (2021). Nilai-Nilai Keadilan dalam Ketetapan MPR-RI Perspektif Siyasah Syar’Iyyah. SIYASATUNA : Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Siyasah Syar'Iyyah, 2(2), 455-471, https://journal.uin-alauddin.ac.id/index.php/siyasatuna/article/-view/22751.
Suadi, A. (2020). The Theory Of Biological Justice in Legal Philosophy and Its Application in Judges’ Decisions. JHP: Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 9(3), 449-464, https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.9.3.2020.449-464.
Suadi, A. (2022). Protection of Women'S and Children'S Rights Based on System Interconnection: A New Paradigm of Execution of Women and Children'S Rights after Divorce. JHP: Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 11(3), 499-522, http://dx.doi.org/10.25216/jhp.11.3.2022.499-522.
Suadi, A. (2023). Jaminan Hukum Perlindungan Perempuan dan Anak. Jakarta : Kencana.
Ucaryilmaz, T. (2021). The Principle of Proportionality in Modern Ius Gentium. Utrecht Journal of International and European Law, 36(1), 14–32.DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ujiel.529.
Wardianto, K & Dimyati, K. (2014). Basis Epistimologis Paradigma Rasional Dalam Ilmu Hukum: Sebuah Deskripsi Tentang Asumsi-Asumsi Dasar Teori Hukum Murni Hans Kelsen. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 14(3), 375. http://dinamikahukum.fh.unsoed.ac.id/index.php/JDH/article/view/304.
Zimmermann, A., & Lee-Stronach, C. . (2022). Proceed with Caution. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 52(1), 6-25. https://doi.org/10.1017/can.2021.17 .
Zippelius, R. (1982). Rechtsphilosophie. Munich: Beck Munchen.
