AI in Law: Urgency of the Implementation of Artificial Intelligence on Law Enforcement in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26555/novelty.v14i1.a25943Keywords:
Urgency, Artificial Intelligence, Law EnforcementAbstract
Introduction to The Problem: The advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has marked the beginning of an age in digital technology, social economics, human needs, and professional conduct. A previous study shows a significant difference in the level of accuracy between Artificial Intelligence (AI) machines and human advocates in which AI machines turned out to be more accurate than advocates. However, the challenges are related to the inadequacy of laws in responding to the development of AI. Furthermore, Indonesian law enforcement officers lack awareness of the advantages of using AI to support their profession.
Purpose/Objective Study: Hence, this study aims to analyze the urgency of implementing AI for law enforcement in providing legal services and the law enforcement process.
Design/Methodology/Approach: The method used in this research is normative, empirical research with Statute and Conceptual Approach. Furthermore, the data uses primary and secondary data sources. Primary data was obtained through interviews with law enforcement officials. Meanwhile, secondary data sources are primary and secondary legal materials. Furthermore, it will be analyzed qualitatively and presented descriptively.
Findings: Artificial Intelligence (AI) is crucial in assisting in developing services and law enforcement, especially for Indonesian law enforcement, which still relies on manual or conventional means to carry out its duties. Artificial Intelligence (AI) can bring benefits in terms of time efficiency and accuracy in assessing cases urgently needed by law enforcement. In terms of law enforcement's perception of the use of AI, they are placed as assistants who cannot entirely replace the law enforcement profession since Artificial Intelligence (AI) lacks human traits that law enforcement officers must possess.
Paper Type: Research Article
References
Aldyan, A., & Negi, A. (2022). The Model of Law Enforcement Based on Pancasila Justice. Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System, 2(3), 178–190. https://doi.org/10.53955/jhcls.v2i3.51
Aletras, N., Tsarapatsanis, D., Preotiuc-Pietro, D., & Lampos, V. (2016). Predicting judicial decisions of the European court of human rights: A natural
language processing perspective. PeerJ Computer Science, 2, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.93
Amal, N. N. (2018). Kenalkan Si ‘Cantik’ LIA, Chatbot Hukum Pertama di Indonesia (p. 1). Viva.co.id.
Anshori. (2022). Gagasan Artificial Intelligence dalam Penerapan Hukum Di Era 4.0 Perspektif Penyelesaian Perkara Model Restorasi Justice dan Hukum Progresif. Legal Studies Journal, 2(2), 1–13.
Atkinson, K., Bench-Capon, T., & Bollegala, D. (2020). Explanation in AI and Law:
Past, Present and Future. Artificial Intelligence, 289, 103387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2020.103387
Budiarto, A., Anugerah, B., Santoso, S., Kaish, E., Biana, Am. C. J., & Hoesodo, T. (2018). Pelaksanaan Prinsip- Prinsip Demokrasi Dalam Sistem Politik Di Indonesia Guna Mewujudkan Keadilan Sosial Bagi Seluruh Rakyat Indonesia. Jurnal Kajian Lemhannas RI, 34(4), 1–87.
Clarke, R. (2019). Regulatory alternatives for AI. Computer Law and Security Review, 35(4), 398–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2019.04.008
Disemadi, H. S. (2021). Urgensi Regulasi Khusus dan Pemanfaatan Artificial Intelligencedalam Mewujudkan Perlindungan Data Pribadi di Indonesia. Wawasan Yuridika, 5(2), 177–199. https://doi.org/10.25072/jwy.v5i2.460
Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Ismagilova, E., Aarts, G., Coombs, C., Crick, T., Duan, Y., Dwivedi, R., Edwards, J., Eirug, A., Galanos, V., Ilavarasan, P. V., Janssen, M., Jones, P., Kar, A. K., Kizgin, H., Kronemann, B., Lal, B., Lucini, B., … Williams, M. D. (2021). Artificial Intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.002
Ekklesia, D. G. (2022). Digital Civility Index dan Karakter Bangsa dalam Wacana Pembangunan. KRITIS, 31(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.24246/kritis.v31i1p1-16
Fachri, F. K. (2023). Pertama di Dunia, ‘Robot Lawyer’ Penasihat
Hukum Terdakwa di Persidangan AS. HukumOnline. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/pertama-di-dunia--robot-lawyer-penasihat-hukum-terdakwa-di-persidangan-as-lt63be79c7609a8/
Fauzi, A. A., Harto, B., Mulyanto, Dulame, I. M., Pramuditha, P., Gede Iwan Sudipa, I., Dwipayana, A. D., Sofyan, W., Jatnika, R., & Wulandari, R. (2023). Pemanfaatan Teknologi Informasi di Berbagai Sektor Pada Masa Society 5.0. PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.
Firm, U. L. (2018). UMBRA Law Firm adopts Luminance’s artificial intelligence in Indonesia. Umbra.Law; Umbra.
Ghazmi, S. F. (2021). The Urgency of Regulating Artificial Intelligence in Online Business Sector in INdonesia. Hukum Lex Generalis, 2(8), 782–803.
Hakim, H. A., Bagus, C., Praja, E., Djanggih, H., Hukum, F., Magelang, U. M., & Tengah, J. (2021). The Urgency on Designing the Legislation for the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Indonesian Medical Practice. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 21(4), 541–550.
Hakim, L. (2022). Peranan Kecerdasan Buatan (Artificial Intelligence) dalam Pendidikan. Ppg.Kemdikbud.Go.Id/.
Kominfo. (2018, March). Apa itu Industri 4.0 dan Bagaimana Indonesia Menyongsongnya. Kominfo RI.
Kurniawan, E., Romadhon, A. H., Kusumawardani, I. A., Zakaria, Z., & Rudi Iswono, A. (2020). Formulasi Kebijakan Concreto in Abstracto UU ITE. Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal), 9(1), 64–73. https://doi.org/10.24843/jmhu.2020.v09.i01.p05
Lee, Z. Y., Karim, M. E., & Ngui, K. (2021). Deep learning artificial intelligence and the law of causation : application , challenges and solutions application , challenges and solutions. Information & Communications Technology Law, 30(3), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600834.2021.1890678
Machmud, M., Masmuh, A., Nasirin, C., Salahudin, Haharuddin, T., & Musma, A. E. Z. (2020). Artificial Intelligence in the Public Health Sector : The Use of Telemedicine in Indonesia During Covid-19. Palarch, Journal Of Archaeology Of Egypt/Egyptology, 17(7), 10106–10118.
Majeed, Z. (2021). China Creates ‘AI Prosecutor’ To Identify Crimes With 97% Accuracy: Report. Republicworld.Com.
Manurung, E. H., & Heliany, I. (2019). Peran Hukum Dan Tantangan Penegak Hukum Dalam Menghadapi Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. Sol Justisio : Jurnal Penelitian Hukum, 1(2), 128–135.
Mardatillah, A. (2018). LIA, Chatbot Hukum Pertama Indonesia Resmi Diluncurkan. Hukum Online; Hukumonline. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/lia--chatbot-hukum-pertama-indonesia-resmi-diluncurkan-lt5b6a4dcab1765
Menpanrb, H. (2020, March). Pelayanan Publik Lebih Efektif dengan Kecerdasan Buatan. Menpan.Go.Id.
Moho, H. (2019). Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia Menurut Aspek Kepastian Hukum, Keadilan, dan Kemanfaatan. Jurnal Warta, 13(1), 138–149.
Montoya, L., & Rivas, P. (2019). Government AI readiness meta-analysis for Latin America and the Caribbean. In 2019 IEEE International Symposium
on Technology and Society (ISTAS) (pp. 1–8). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/istas48451.2019.8937869
Mowbray, A., Chung, P., & Greenleaf, G. (2020). Utilising AI in the legal assistance sector—Testing a role for legal information institutes. Computer Law and Security Review, 38, 105407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2020.105407
Muhaimin. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum (F. Hijriyanti (ed.)). Mataram University Press.
Nuryanto, A. (2021). Tantangan Administrasi Publik di Dunia Artificial
Intelligence dan Bot. Jejaring Administrasi Publik, 12(2), 139–147. https://doi.org/10.20473/jap.v12i2.30882
Panjaitan, A. C. D., & Effendi, T. (2019). Kecerdasan Buatan (Artificial Intelligence) Sebagai Alat Bantu Proses Penyusunan Undang-Undang Dalam Upaya Menghadapi Revolusi Industri 4.0 Di Indonesia. Simposium Hukum Indonesia, 1(1), 450–461.
Pers, S. (2018). Making Indonesia 4.0: Strategi RI Masuki Revolusi Industri Ke-4. Kemenperin RI.
Prasetio, D. E., & Widodo, H. (2022). Ius Constituendum Pengujian Formil Dalam Perubahan Konstitusi. AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pranata Sosial Islam, 4(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.37680/almanhaj.v4i1.1478
Pratama, A. H. (2018). Flash] Hukumonline Luncurkan Layanan
Chatbot Hukum Pertama di Indonesia. Techinasia; techinasia. https://id.techinasia.com/hukumonline-chatbot-hukum-lia
Putranti, D., & Anggraeny, K. D. (2022). Inventor’s Legal Liability upon the Invention of Artificial Intelligence in Indonesia. Varia Justicia, 18(1), 71–83.
Revena, D. (2006). Mencandra Hukum Progresif. Syiar Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 9(3), 190–201.
Sihombing, E. N., & Adi Syaputra, M. Y. (2020). Implementasi Penggunaan Kecerdasan Buatan dalam Pembentukan Peraturan Daerah. Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum, 14(3), 419–434. https://doi.org/10.30641/kebijakan.2020.v14.419-434
Sunarti, S., Fadzlul Rahman, F., Naufal, M., Risky, M., Febriyanto, K., &
Masnina, R. (2021). Artificial intelligence in Healthcare: Opportunities
and Risk for Future. Gaceta Sanitaria, 35(1), S67–S70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2020.12.019
Sung, M.-H., & Hakim, H. A. (2019). Unitary, Federalized, or Decentralized?: The Case Study of Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta as the Special Autonomous Regions in Indonesia. Indonesian Comparative Law Review, 1(2), 2–8. https://doi.org/10.18196/iclr.1210
Surden, H. (2019). Artificial Intelligence and Law: An Overview. Georgia State University Law Review, 35(4), 1306–1337. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1665-5_3
Varkey, M. (2019). Indonesian Law Firm Awards 2019. Asia Business Law Journal.
Wachter, S., Mittelstadt, B., & Russell, C. (2021). Why fairness cannot be automated: Bridging the gap between EU non-discrimination law and AI. Computer Law and Security Review, 41, 105567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2021.105567
Xu, N., & Wang, K. J. (2021). Adopting robot lawyer? The extending artificial intelligence robot lawyer technology acceptance model for legal industry by an exploratory study. Journal of Management and Organization, 27(5), 867–885. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2018.81
