Implications of Utilizing Protected Forest Areas for Geothermal Business: A Legal Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26555/novelty.v14i1.a24765Keywords:
Implications, Protected Forest, Geothermal, BusinessAbstract
Introduction to The Problem: Geothermal as an alternative and renewable energy is mostly located in the forest areas, including protected forests, where the use of forest areas for non-forestry activities is very selective and does not change the function of the forest itself. Geothermal and forestry regulations require synchronization regarding the use of protected forest areas so that they do not cause legal conflicts.
Purpose/Objective Study: There are arose problems namely the existence of conflicting norms in regulating the use of protected forest areas for geothermal exploitation, between the Geothermal Law and the Forestry Law in combination with Government Regulation No. 24 of 2010 concerning the Use of Forest Areas and Regulation of the Minister of Environment and Forestry on Leasing of Forest Areas.
Design/Methodology/Approach: This research method was normative research, using a statutory approach equipped with a comparative approach.
Findings: The research finding was the setting of leasing forest areas for geothermal exploitation was contradictory and did not function to carry out the orders of the Forestry Law. The research implication is that the Government together with the Parliament must put into comprehensive special authorities and regulations related to the management and utilization of energy in forest areas so that there is no overlap and legal uncertainty in the use of forest areas.
Paper Type: Research Article
References
Akib, M. (2015). Penegakan Hukum Lingkungan dalam Perspektif Holistik-Ekologis. Yogyakarta:GRAHA ILMU.
Akmal, F., Darnel, H., & Sugiharto, P. (2000). The Geothermal Power Business In Java-Bali: Trading Mechanism, Competitiveness With Fossil Fuel, and Challenges To Its Development. Proceedings World Geothermal Congress (pp. 777-783). Kyushu - Tohoku: Geothermal-Energy.
Arias, E. R., (2016). Geothermal energy in the framework of international environmental law. In Geothermal Power Generation: Developments and Innovation (pp. 763–786). Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100337-4.00026-7
Athanasiadis, A., & Andreopoulou, Z. (2019). E-praxis: A web-based forest law decision support system for land characterization in Greece. Forest Policy and Economics, 103, 157–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.03.002
Borgstrom, S. (2018). Reviewing natural resources law in the light of bioeconomy: Finnish forest regulations as a case study. In Forest Policy and Economics (Vol. 88, pp. 11–23). Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2017.10.012
Dachlan, E. N., Putiksari, V., Budi Prasetyo, L., kunci, K., Bumi, P., Tutupan Lahan, P., & Alam, C. (2015). Geothermal Energy Utilization in the Kamojang Nature Reserve, West Java, Indonesia. Forum Geografi, 29 (2) http://Journals.ums.ac.id/index.php/fg/article/view/999
Darma, S. (2016). Indonesia: Vast geothermal potential, modest but growing exploitation. In Geothermal Power Generation: Developments and Innovation (pp. 609–643). Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100337-4.00021-8
Dutu, R. (2016). Challenges and policies in Indonesia’s energy sector. Energy Policy, 98, 513–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.09.009
Erbaugh, J. T., & Nurrochmat, D. R. (2019). Paradigm shift and business as usual through policy layering: Forest-related policy change in Indonesia (1999-2016). Land Use Policy, 86, 136–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.04.021
Fandari, A. E., Daryanto, A., Suprayitno, G. (2014). Pengembangan Energi Panas Bumi yang Berkelanjutan, Jurnal Ilmiah Semesta Teknika, 17(1), 68–82.
Gordon Bloomquist, R. (1986). A Review and Analysis of The Adequacy of The U.S. Legal, Institutional and Financial Framework for Geothermal Development. Geothermics Vol. 15, (Issue 1).
Hadimuljono, M. B., Kurniawan, P., & Rahardjo, W. (2019). Geothermal Economics Handbook in Indonesia, Peluang dan Tantangan (1st ed.). Yogyakarta:CV ANDI OFFSET.
Hissa, L. de B. V., Aguiar, A. P. D., Camargo, R. R., Lima, L. S. de, Gollnow, F., & Lakes, T. (2019). Regrowing forests contribution to law compliance and carbon storage in private properties of the Brazilian Amazon. Land Use Policy, 88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104163
HS, S. (2018). Pengantar Hukum Sumber Daya Alam (1st ed.). Depok:Rajawali Press.
Leberger, R., Rosa, I. M. D., Guerra, C. A., Wolf, F., & Pereira, H. M. (2020). Global patterns of forest loss across IUCN categories of protected areas. Biological Conservation, 241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108299
Manzella, A., Bonciani, R., Allansdottir, A., Botteghi, S., Donato, A., Giamberini, S., Lenzi, A., Paci, M., Pellizzone, A., & Scrocca, D. (2018). Environmental and social aspects of geothermal energy in Italy. Geothermics, 72, 232–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2017.11.015
Pambudi, N. A. (2018). Geothermal power generation in Indonesia, a country within the ring of fire: Current status, future development and policy. In Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews (Vol. 81, pp. 2893–2901). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.06.096
Pan, S. Y., Gao, M., Shah, K. J., Zheng, J., Pei, S. L., & Chiang, P. C. (2019). Establishment of enhanced geothermal energy utilization plans: Barriers and strategies. In Renewable Energy (Vol. 132, pp. 19–32). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.07.126
Putraditama, A., Kim, Y. S., & Sánchez Meador, A. J. (2019). Community forest management and forest cover change in Lampung, Indonesia. Forest Policy and Economics, 106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.101976
Rahmadi, T. (2016). Hukum Lingkungan di Indonesia (6th ed.). Jakarta:Rajawali Press.
Ratio, M. A., Gabo-Ratio, J. A., & Fujimitsu, Y. (2020). Exploring public engagement and social acceptability of geothermal energy in the Philippines: A case study on the Makiling-Banahaw Geothermal Complex. Geothermics, 85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2019.101774
Redi, A. (2014). Hukum Sumber Daya Alam dalam Sektor Kehutanan (1st ed.). Jakarta:Sinar Grafika.
Roche, M. (2017). Forest governance and sustainability pathways in the absence of a comprehensive national forest policy — The case of New Zealand. Forest Policy and Economics, 77, 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2015.12.007
Sahide, M. A. K., Fisher, M. R., Maryudi, A., Dhiaulhaq, A., Wulandari, C., Kim, Y. S., & Giessen, L. (2018). Deadlock opportunism in contesting conservation areas in Indonesia. Land Use Policy, 77, 412–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.05.020
Sandstrom, C., Kanyama, A. C., Räty, R., Sonnek, K. M., Nordström, E. M., Mossing, A., & Nordin, A. (2020). Policy goals and instruments for achieving a desirable future forest: Experiences from backcasting with stakeholders in Sweden. Forest Policy and Economics, 111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.102051
Sasanifar, S., Alijanpour, A., Banj Shafiei, A., Eshaghi Rad, J., Molaei, M., & Azadi, H. (2019). Forest protection policy: Lesson learned from Arasbaran biosphere reserve in Northwest Iran. Land Use Policy, 87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104057
Selamat, M. (2018). Hukum Sumber Daya Alam Indonesia, Dari Era Kolonial sampai Otonomi Daerah (1st ed.). Malang:Setara Press.
Sloan, S., Campbell, M. J., Alamgir, M., Collier-Baker, E., Nowak, M. G., Usher, G., & Laurance, W. F. (2018). Infrastructure development and contested forest governance threaten the Leuser Ecosystem, Indonesia. Land Use Policy, 77, 298–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.05.043
Sotirov, M., & Storch, S. (2018). Resilience through policy integration in Europe? Domestic forest policy changes as response to absorb pressure to integrate biodiversity conservation, bioenergy use and climate protection in France, Germany, the Netherlands and Sweden. Land Use Policy, 79, 977–989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.04.034
Springate-Baginski, O., Thein, A. K., Neil, A., Thu, W. M., & Doherty, F. (2014). Democratising timber: An assessment of Myanmar’s emerging “Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade” (FLEGT) process. Forest Policy and Economics, 48(1), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2014.09.004
Stryamets, N., Elbakidze, M., Chamberlain, J., & Angelstam, P. (2020). Governance of non-wood forest products in Russia and Ukraine: Institutional rules, stakeholder arrangements, and decision-making processes. Land Use Policy, 94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104289
Sumardjono, M. S. W., Ismail, N., Rustiadi, E., & Aman Damai, A. (2011). Pengaturan Sumber Daya Alam di Indonesia, Antara yang Tersurat dan Tersirat (1st ed.). Yogyakarta:Gadjah Mada University Press.
Tacconi, L., & Muttaqin, M. Z. (2019). Reducing emissions from land use change in Indonesia: An overview. In Forest Policy and Economics (Vol. 108). Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.101979
Tsagarakis, K. P., Efthymiou, L., Michopoulos, A., Mavragani, A., Andelkovic, A. S., Antolini, F., Bacic, M., Bajare, D., Baralis, M., Bogusz, W., Burlon, S., Figueira, J., Genç, M. S., Javed, S., Jurelionis, A., Koca, K., Ryzynski, G., Urchueguia, J. F., & Zlender, B. (2020). A review of the legal framework in shallow geothermal energy in selected European countries: Need for guidelines. Renewable Energy, 147, 2556–2571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.10.007
Villamor, G. B. (2006). The rise of protected area policy in the Philippine forest policy: An analysis from the perspective of Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF). Forest Policy and Economics, 9(2), 162–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2005.04.003
Wibowo, A., & Giessen, L. (2015). Absolute and relative power gains among state agencies in forest-related land use politics: The Ministry of Forestry and its competitors in the REDD+ Programme and the One Map Policy in Indonesia. Land Use Policy, 49, 131–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.07.018
