Anticipation of the ITE Law and Reconciliation of Its Forms Freedom of Expression through the E-Hights Website
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26555/novelty.v13i2.a23799Keywords:
Freedom of Opinion, ITE Law, E-Hights.Abstract
Introduction to The Problem: Misinterpretation in the application of the Electronic Information and Transaction Law (ITE) can reduce democracy and undermine law enforcement in Indonesia. The complexity of the problems related to the Electronic Information and Transaction Law requires solutions to prevent and prevent problems with the Electronic Information and Transaction Law.
Departing from the problems posed by the Electronic Information and Transaction Law, Indonesian still need a lot of work to overcome a degrading freedom of expression. We proposed the renewal by making a conceptual design and prototype, namely the E-Hights (Electronic Human Rights) application to overcome those problems.
Purpose/Objective Study: This study is to examine the relationship between the constitution and laws and regulations governing freedom of expression through social media, as well as to examine how the use of a website-based application called E-Hights (Electronic Human Rights) guarantees the implementation of this freedom. expression while minimizing violations of laws governing electronic information and transactions.
Design/Methodology/Approach: This research is normative legal research supported by secondary data in the form of primary and secondary legal materials.
Findings: There are not a few problems in the implementation of the Electronic Information and Transaction Law, the existence of a rubber article in the Electronic Information and Transaction Law which creates multiple interpretations in law enforcement in Indonesia. This multi-interpretation rubber article has an impact on people's freedom of expression. According to research by the Indonesian Judicial Research Institute, the Electronic Information and Transaction Law is a tool to silence freedom of expression. Thus, this can affect democracy in Indonesia, or it could be said that the Electronic Information and Transaction Law makes people afraid to voice their aspirations to the special government. Therefore, the authors offer a solution that is realized in a web-based application.
Paper Type: Research Article or General Review.
References
Adonara, F.F. (2015). Prinsip Kebebasan Hakim dalam Memutuskan Perkara sebagai Amanat Konstitusi. Jurnal Konstitusi, 12 (2), 217-236. doi : https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1222
Ali, M. (2010). Pencemaran Nama Baik Melalui Sarana Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik (Kajian Putusan MK No. 2/PUU-VII/2009). Jurnal Konstitusi, 7(6), 1-28. doi:10.31078/jk765
Dewi, C.I.D.L. (2021). Aspek Hukum Kebebasan Berpendapat dan Berekspresi. Yustitia, 15 (1), 26-34.
Hariyanta, F. A. (2021). Problematika Operasionalisasi Delik Pasal 27 Ayat (3) UU ITE dan Formulasi Hukum Perlindungan Freedom of Speech Dalam Ham. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan Ekonomi, 9(2), 214-229.
IJRS. (2020, December 4). Semua Bisa Kena, Cabut Pasal Karet UU ITE. (Indonesia Judicial Research Society) Retrieved June 18, 2021, from Indonesia Judicial Research Society: http://ijrs.or.id/rilis-pers-semua-bisa-kena-cabut-pasal-karet-uu-ite/
Jahriyah, V., Kusuma, M., Qonitazzakiyah, K., & Fathomi, M. (2021, 11 30). Kebebasan Berekspresi di Media Elektronik Dalam Perspektif Pasal 27 Ayat (3) Undang-Undang No.19 Tahun 2016 Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang No.11 Tahun 2008 Tentang Informasi dan Pelayanan Transaksi Elektronik (UU ITE). SOSIO YUSTISIA: Jurnal Hukum dan Perubahan Sosial, 1(2), 65-87. doi:10.15642/sosyus.v1i2.96
Jamal, F., & Natsif, F. A. (2020). Kebebasan Berpendapat Di Media Sosial Dalam Perspektif Asas Cogitationis Poenam Nemo Patitur. Alauddin Law Development Journal, 2(2), 210-220. doi : https://doi.org/10.24252/aldev.v2i2.15395
Kansil, C., & Kansil, C. (2011). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Kurniawan, M. D., Mayasari, N., & Ismaya, H. (2021, August 26). AMBIVALENSI TRANSAKSI ELEKTRONIK TERHADAP KEBEBASAN BEREKSPRESI BERDASARKAN UU INFORMASI DAN TRANSAKSI ELEKTRONIK (ITE). EDUTAMA, 1-11. Retrieved from https://ejurnal.ikippgribojonegoro.ac.id/index.php/JPE
Lyzara, R. (2019). Evaluasi kebergunaan E-Government Layanan Aspirasi dan Pengaduan Online Rakyat (LAPOR!) pada instansi pemerintah = Usability evaluation of government national complaint handling system (LAPOR!) in Indonesia. Retrieved from ui.ac.id: https://lontar.ui.ac.id/detail?id=20486083&lokasi=lokal
Mawaza, J. F., & Khalil, A. (2020). Masalah Sosial dan Kebijakan Publik di Indonesia (Studi Kasus UU ITE No. 19 Tahun 2016). Journal of Governance Innovation, 2(1), 22-31. doi : https://doi.org/10.36636/jogiv.v2i1.386
Ningsih, C., Amelia, C., Aisyah, P., Zahera, R., & Prasetya, W. (2021, 2 27). HAK KEBEBASAN BERPENDAPAT YANG SEMAKIN MENYEMPIT DAN MEMBURUK. Syntax Fusion : Jurnal Nasional Indonesia, 1(2), 25-39. doi:10.54543/fusion.v1i2.18
Notanubun, P. G. (2014, May). Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Kebebasan Berbicara Dalam Ketentuan Pasal 27. Mimbar Keadilan, 111-120. Retrieved from https://www.neliti.com/publications/240089/tinjauan-yuridis-terhadap-kebebasan-berbicara-dalam-ketentuan-pasal-27-ayat-3-uu#cite
Olivia, D. (2020). Hakikat Kebebasan Berekspresi Dalam Perspektif Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia. RIO LAW JURNAL, 1(2).
Rachmawati, F., & Taduri, J. (2021). Implikasi Pasal Multitafsir UU ITE Terhadap Unsur Penghinaan dan Pencemaran Nama Baik. Seminar Nasional Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang. 7, pp. 491-508. Semarang: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang. doi:10.15294/snhunnes.v7i2.735
Rahmawati, N., Muslichatun, M., & Marizal, M. (2021). Kebebasan Berpendapat Terhadap Pemerintah Melalui Media Sosial Dalam Perspektif UU ITE. Widya Pranata Hukum: Jurnal Kajian dan Penelitian Hukum, 3(1), 62-75. doi : https://doi.org/10.37631/widyapranata.v3i1.270
Rawls, J. (1985). Justice as Fairness: Political not Metaphysical. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 14(3), 223-251.
Richter, H. (2017, June 30). Private Power, Online Information Flows and EU Law: Mind the Gap, by Angela Daly. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 25(3), 239–241. doi:10.1093/ijlit/eax009
Rizki, M. J. (2020, September 25 ). Pencemaran Nama Baik UU ITE yang Turut Mengancam Akademisi. Retrieved from hukumonline.com: https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/pencemaran-nama-baik-uu-ite-yang-turut-mengancam-akademisi-lt5f6d3f31c1b82/
Rohmy, A. M., Suratman, T., & Nihayaty, A. I. (2021). UU ITE dalam Perspektif Perkembangan teknologi informasi dan komunikasi. Dakwatuna: Jurnal Dakwah dan Komunikasi Islam, 7(2), 309-339. doi : https://doi.org/10.54471/dakwatuna.v7i2.1202
Safenet. (2020, August 5). [Rilis Pers] SAFEnet: Kemenkes, Stop Intimidasi Jurnalis. Retrieved from safenet.or.id: https://safenet.or.id/id/2020/08/rilis-pers-safenet-kemenkes-stop-intimidasi-jurnalis/
Siallagan, H. (2016). Penerapan prinsip negara hukum di Indonesia. Sosiohumaniora, 18(2), 122-128.
Sugiharto, B. A. (2016, Desember 28). 'Pasal Karet' UU ITE Jadi Pamungkas Jeratan Hukum. Retrieved from cnnindonesia.com: https://www.cnnindonesia.com/teknologi/20161228182458-185-182719/pasal-karet-uu-ite-jadi-pamungkas-jeratan-hukum
Triwahyuningsih, S. (2018). Perlindungan dan penegakan hak asasi manusia (ham) di indonesia. Legal Standing: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2(2), 113-121. doi : 10.24269/ls.v2i2.1242
Whalen, R. (2022, April 05 ). Defining legal technology and its implications. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 30(1), 47–67. doi:10.1093/ijlit/eaac005
Wibowo, T. O. (2018, October). Konstruksi Ujaran Kebencian Melalui Status Media Sosial. Channel Jurnal Komunikasi, 6(2), 169-176. doi:10.12928/channel.v6i2.11578
Wulandari, S., Sulfary, A., Putri, R. R. T., Firdaus, A., & Pradnyawan, S. W. A. (2021). Dampak Pasal-Pasal Multitafsir Dalam Uu Ite Terhadap Penanggulangan Cyber Crime Di Indonesia. In Proceeding of Conference on Law and Social Studies. Retrieved from : http://prosiding.unipma.ac.id/index.php/COLaS/article/view/1864
