Criminalization Based on the Principle of Human Rights Limitation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26555/novelty.v13i1.a23606Keywords:
Criminalization, Human rights, Limitation, ProportionalityAbstract
Introduction to The Problem: The use of criminal law to limit the freedom of citizens’ civil rights must be done with caution since it intimately links to the infringement of such rights.
Purpose/Objective Study: The present study aims to explore the criteria of criminalization based on the principle of limitations of human rights.
Design/Methodology/Approach: This study employed doctrinal legal research using both conceptual and statutory approaches
Findings: In the policy formation of illegal acts, the legislator frequently formulates rights constraints. The criminalization criteria specified in the human rights limitation can be used to apply this restriction. Restriction-containing offenses determined by the legislature must be by law, legitimate aim, and necessity in a democratic society. A consistent model of criteria for democratic society demands does not exist. This last criterion is linked to both the proportionality principle in human rights and the concept of criminal law as a last resort.
Paper Type: Research Article
References
Abdullah, A. G. (2004). Pengantar Memahami Undang-Undang Tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 1(2), 1-10.
Aisah, S. (2020). Standar Norma dan Pengaturan Nomor 2 tentang Hak Atas Kebebasan Beragama dab Berkeyakinan. Jakarta: Komnas HAM RI.
Alhakim, A. (2022). Urgensi Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Jurnalis dari
Risiko Kriminalisasi UU Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik di
Indonesia. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 4(1), 93. doi:https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v4i1.89-106
Ali, M. (2018). Proporsionalitas dalam Kebijakan Formulasi Sanksi Pidana. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 25(1), 137-145.
Ali, M. (2020). Hukum Pidana sebagai Last Resort dalam Undang-undang Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 68-84. doi:10.20885/iustum.vol27.iss1.art4
Ali, M., & Setiawan, M. (2021). Teori Hukum Pidana Minimalis dari Douglas Husak: Urgensi dan Relevansi. Undang Jurnal Hukum, 4(1), 260. doi:https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.4.1.245-279
Amrani, H. (2019). Politik Pembaruan Hukum Pidana. Yogyakarta: UII Press.
Anindyajati, T. (2015). The Constitutionality of Criminal Sanction Norms as Ultimum Remidium in the Making of Laws. Jurnal Konstitusi, 12(4), 873-880.
Arief, B. N. (2013). Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Aziz, M. (2009). Landasan Formil dan Materiil Konstitusional Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 6(3), 585-590.
Fatmawati. (2011). Perlindungan Hak Atas Kebebasan Beragama dan Beribadah dalam Negara Hukum Indonesia. Jurnal Konstitusi, 8(4), 490-493.
Flores, I. (2013). Proportionality in Constitutional and Human Rights Interpretation. 7, Georgetown Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper, 102.
Handoko, D. (2019). Politik Hukum Kriminalisasi dan Dekriminalisasi di Bidang Hak Cipta. Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum, 13(1), 99.
Husak, D. (2005). Applying Ultima Ratio: A Skeptical Assessment. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 2(2), 535-545.
Jareborg, N. (2005). Criminalization as Last Resort (Ultima Ratio). Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 2(2), 521-534.
Marwan, A. (2016). Criticising Enactment of Law Fiction Theory. Jurnal De Jure, 16(3), 255-256.
Marwandianto , & Nasution, H. (2020). Hak Atas Kebebasan Berpendapat Dan Berekspresi Dalam Koridor Penerapan Pasal 310 Dan 311 KUHP. Jurnal HAM, 11(1), 5-6. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.30641/ham.2020.11.1-25
Matompo, O. (2014). Pembatasan terhadap Hak Asasi Manusia dalam Perspektif Keadaan Darurat. Jurnal Media Hukum, 21(1), 57-72.
Meagher, D. (2013). The Common Law Principle of Legality in the Age of Rights. 35, Melbourne University Law Review, 470.
Nampewo, Z., Mike, J., & Wolff, J. (2022). Respecting, protecting and fulfilling the human right to health. International Journal of Equity in Health, 21(36), 4-7.
Nataruddin. (2017). Pengembangan Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia untuk Pendidikan dan Pelatihan Polri . Yogyakarta: PUSHAM UII Press.
Nowak, M. (2003). Introduction to the International Human Rights Law . United Kingdom: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Onibala, I. (2013). Ketertiban Umum dalam Perspektif Hukum Perdata Internasional. Jurnal Hukum Unsrat, 1(2), 123-130.
Persak, N. (2007). Criminalizing Harmful Conduct: The Harm Principle, Its Limits and Continental Counterparts. New York: Springer.
Rahmawati, N. (2021). Kebebasan Berpendapat Terhadap Pemerintah Melalui Media Sosial dalam Perspektif UU ITE. Pranata Hukum, 3(1), 62-75.
Rasyidi, M. A. (2021). Menuju Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Jurnal Mitra Manajemen, 12(1), 6.
Rizal, M. (2018). Kebijakan Kriminalisasi Konsumsi Minuman Beralkohol di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 7(1), 109.
Sonata, D. L. (2014). Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris: Karakteristik Khas dari Metode Penelitian Hukum. iat Justitia Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 24-25.
Stone, A. (2020). Proportionality and Its Alternatives. Federal Law, 48(1), 123-150. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0067205X19890448
Trechsel, S. (2000). Comparative Observations on Human Rights Law and Criminal Law . Saint Louis-Warsaw Transatlantic Law Journal, 4-5.
Tulkens, F. (2011). The Paradogxical Relationship Between Criminal Law and Human Rights . Journal of International Criminal Justice, 578.
Umboh, C. (2020). Penerapan Konsep Trias Politica dalam Sistem Pemerintahan Republik Indonesia. Lex Administratum, 8(1), 328-338.
Weisberg, G. B. (2016). What is Criminal Law About? Michigan Law Review, 1175.
Widayati, L. S. (2018). Kebijakan Kriminalisasi Kesusilaan dalam Rancangan Undang-Undang tentang Hukum Pidana dari Perspektif Moral. Negara Hukum, 9(2), 181.
Wilennmann, J. (2019). Framing Meaning through Criminalization: A Test for the Theory of Criminalization . New Criminal Law Review, 3-10.
