The Implementation of the Principle of Justice in Post-nuptial Agreement towards Mixed Marriage: Hope or Challenge?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26555/novelty.v12i2.a17856Keywords:
Mixed Marriage, Ownership of Asset, Post-nuptial AgreementAbstract
Introduction to the Problem: this research focuses on the actors of mixed marriage in Indonesia who have hope at the practice level. The hope arises from the Constitutional Court decision No. 69/VII/PUU/2015, which allows the formation of an asset separation agreement after the marriage takes place (post-nuptial agreement). The decision is followed up by two Circular Letters of relevant ministries: one is from the Ministry of Home Affairs No. 472.2/5876/Dukcapil, which guarantees that post-nuptial agreement is allowed in the Civil Registry (Dukcapil); as well as the one from Directorate Generals of Community Guidance under the Ministry of Religion No. B.2674/DJ/III/KW.00/9/2017. By enacting these instruments, Indonesia facilitates a hope to the mixed marriage, which is the hope of the ownership of the assets.
Objectives of the Study: To identify the implication of the Constitutional Court decision No. 69/VII/PUU/2015 in practice, in lieu with the implication of the Circular Letters of the Ministry of Home Affairs No. 472.2/5876/Dukcapil and Directorate Generals of Community Guidance under the Ministry of Religion No. B.2674/DJ/III/KW.00/9/2017; also, to review the possibilities of those decisions and Circular Letters in the perspective of Indonesian family law, would it be a hope or a challenge?
Methodology: This is normative-juridical research, which implements a doctrinal approach to analyze the problems.
Findings: Post-nuptial agreement is allowed and having legal implications to the parties to the marriage bond. Ministry of Home Affairs and the Ministry of Religion have facilitated the Constitutional Court decision by enacting their respective Circular Letters to guide the civil registry officials in responding to the post-nuptial agreement.
Paper Type: Research Article
References
Amruzi, Fahmi Al. 2014. Hukum Harta Kekayaan Perkawinan. Yogyakarta: Aswaja press.
Andriani, Dian, Bambang Santoso, and Oksidelfa Yanto. 2020. “Pemisahan Harta Perkawinan Campuran Dan Akibat Hukumnya Jika Diwariskan Tanpa Wasiat Pada Anak Berkewarganegaraan Ganda.” Jurnal Lex Specialis 1 (1): 61–70. http://openjournal.unpam.ac.id/index.php/jlsp/article/view/6501.
Anjasari, Lulu. 2018. “MK: Perjanjian Perkawinan Dapat Dilakukan Selama Masa Perkawinan.” 2018. https://www.mkri.id/index.php?page=web.Berita&id=13415&menu=2.
Anwar, Syamsul. 1999. “Perjanjian Dalam Islam, Kajian Terhadap Masalah Cacat Kehendak (Wilsgebereken).” Jurnal Penelitian Agama Januari-Ap (21).
Arikunto, Suharsimu. 1996. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Budiartha, I Nyoman Putu. 2017. “Dilema Penegakan Hukum Putusan MK No.69/PUU-XII/2015 (Persoalan Perkawinan Campuran Tanpa Perjanjian Kawin).” Jurnal Notariil 1 (2): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.22225/jn.2.1.151.1-12.
Clarke, ElIiabeth Cooke, and Spencer. 2014. “The Law Commission’s Report on Matrimonial Property, Needs and Agreements.” Family Law Quarterly 48 (2): 14.
Cuadra, Bernardo G. 2012. “All Good Things Might Come to An End : Postnuptial Agreements in Connecticut.” Western New England Law Review’s 34 (1): 57–143.https://digitalcommons.law.wne.edu/lawreview/vol34/iss1/3/.
Djasadin Saragih. 1974. Dasar-Dasar Hukum Perdata Internasional. Bandung: Alumni.
Elko, Sharai. 2015. “Alimony Provisions in Premarital, Postnuptial, and Separation Agreements.” Journal Contemporary Legal Issues 93.
Gautama, Sudargo. 1995. Hukum Perdata Internasional, Jilid II, Bagian I, Buku Ke-7. Bandung: Alumni.
Harahap, M. Yahya. 2007. Kedudukan Kewenangan Dan Acara Peradilan Agama,. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Harahap, Sayaman. 2016. “Penerapan Ketentuan Pasal 21 Ayat (3) UUPA Tentang Kepemilikan Tanah Bagi WNI Dalam Perkawinan Campuran.” Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan 4 (3): 436. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v4i3.328.
Hernoko, Agus, Erni Agustin, Faizal Kurniawan, and Mahendri Putri. 2018. “Nuptial Agreement in Indonesia: A New Change in Indonesian Marriage Law” 131 (1): 24–27. https://doi.org/10.2991/iclgg-17.2018.4.
Ismail, Didi Jubaidi, and Maman Abdul Djaliel. 2000. Membina Rumah Tangga Islami Di Bawah Ridha Allah. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.
Judiasih, Sonny Dewi. 2017. “Pertaruhan Esensi Itikad Baik Dalam Pembuatan Perjanjian Kawin Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 69/PUU-XIII/2015.” Jurnal Notariil 1 (2): 68–88. https://doi.org/10.22225/jn.2.1.179.68-83.
Lawrence Li. 2014. “Be Prepared in Advance : A Case for Allowing Binding Prenuptial Agreement in Hongkong.” International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 28 (3): 23. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/ebu003.
Lemmings, David. 1996. “Marriage and the Law in the Eighteenth Century: Hardwicke’s Marriage Act of 1753.” Historical Journal 39 (2). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0018246X00020276.
Mamudji, Sri. 2005. Metode Penelitian Dan Penulisan Hukum. Jakarta: Badan Penerbit Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia.
Manan, Abdul, and M. Fauzan. 2000. Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perdata Wewenang Peradilan Agama. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Melisiyani, Dwi Putri. 2018. “Studi Komparatif Tentang Perjanjian Perkawinan Sebelum Dan Sesudah Adanya Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 69/PUU-XIII/2015.” Jurnal Fatwa Hukum 1 (2). https://jurnal.untan.ac.id/index.php/jfh/article/view/25378/0.
Mosberg, By Michael A, and Patricia Kindregan. 2019. “Ten Practice Tips for Postnuptial Agreements : Drafting Considerations and Formalities.” Family Law Quarterly 52 (2).
Mubarok, Ahmad Fiter. 2018. “Implikasi Putusan MK Dalam Perkawinan Campuran Di KUA Lelea Kabupaten Indramayu (Studi Putusan MK No. 69/PUU/XII/2015 Dan Surat Edaran Dukcapil No. 472.2/5876/DUKCAPIL.” Universitas Islam Indonesia. https://dspace.uii.ac.id/handle/123456789/8110.
Muttaqin. 2003. Pedoman Pegawai Pencatat Nikah (PPN ). Jakarta: Departemen Agama RI.
Rowan, Eleanor. 2018. “A ‘Thorne’ in the Side for Family Lawyers in Australia: Undue Influence and Prenuptial Contracts.” Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 40 (2): 238–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/09649069.2018.1451024.
Sanjaya, Umar Haris. 2019. “Good Faith on Contract Performance.” Arena Hukum 12 (3): 500–523. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2019.01203.6.
Sanjaya, Umar Haris, and Tedy Kuswara. 2018. “Implementation of Personality Principle in the Termination of Village Ground Treasure Utilization No. 143/1728 Between PB. Rancah Karya and Catur Tunggal Village Government.” SHS Web of Conferences 54. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20185406002.
Setyaningsih, Ni Putu Ari. 2020. “Akibat Hukum Pembuatan Perjanjian Perkawinan Setelah Perkawinan Berlangsung Terhadap Utang Bersama.” Yustitia 14 (2). https://www.ojs.unr.ac.id/index.php/yustitia/article/view/499.
Sorgjerd., Caroline. 2012. Reconstructing Marriage : The Legal Status of Relationships in a Changing Society. First edit. England: Intersentia.
Tjitrosudibio, R. Subekti dan R. 2009. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.
Timex, Hendhy, Suhariningsih, and Rachmi Sulistyarini. 2015.“Pembuatan dan Pengesahan Perjanjian Perkawinan Melalui Penetapan Pengadilan dan Notaris Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 69/PUU-XIII/2015" Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila Dan Kewarganegaraan (JIPPK) 13 (3): 1576–80.
Umar Haris Sanjaya, Aunur Rahim Faqih. 2017. Hukum Perkawinan Islam Di Indonesia. Gama Media. Vol. 46.
Walker, Laura M. 2015. Family Law and Public Policy. Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer Law & Business.
Werdiningsih, Rato, Dominikus, M Khoidin, and Aries Harianto. 2020. “Marriage Agreement During Marriage (A Postnuptial Agreement) Principle of Publicity as a Legal Protection for Creditors.” Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization 101: 129–40. https://doi.org/10.7176/jlpg/101-14.
Widyadi, Made. 2019. “Authority of Notary and the Power of Law Postnuptial Agreement Deed Post-Decision of Constitutional Court.” Jurnal Notariil 4 (1): 27–37. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22225/jn.4.1.749.27-37.
