License Revocation of Insurance Companies and Legal Protections of the Policyholders
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26555/novelty.v11i1.a15139Keywords:
Business License, Revocation, Insurance Company, PolicyholdersAbstract
Introduction to The Problem: Revocation of insurance company business licenses certainly has an effect on the insured as consumers who must be protected. In this case, OJK oversees the flow of revocation of business licenses, which requires insurance companies to report settlement of corporate obligations.
Purpose/Objective Study: This research discussed the types of license revocation of the insurance companies and legal protections of the policyholders when this revocation happened.
Design/Methodology/Approach: This study is a qualitative one, which uses a normative juridical method. It approached by the juridical research that uses primary data in the form of Acts or Regulations.
Findings: The types of business license revocation of insurance companies are divided into 4, namely: (1) cancellation of business licenses due to administrative sanctions that are gradually applied; (2) revocation of business licenses due to company requests; (3) dismissal of business licenses due to bankruptcy, and; (4) revocation of business licenses due to the merging or business combination. The respective procedures are governed by the relevant OJK Regulations. The repeal of insurance company business licenses certainly has an effect on the insured as consumers who must be protected. In this case, OJK oversees the flow of revocation of business licenses, which requires insurance companies to report settlement of corporate obligations.
References
Abubakar, L., & Sukmadilaga, C. (2017). Implementasi kepatuhan terhadap prinsip syariah melalui penggunaan polis standar dalam praktik asuransi syariah. Rechtidee, 12(1), 107. https://doi.org/10.21107/ri.v12i1.2852
Apriani, R. (2018). Sanksi hukum terhadap pihak penanggung atas klaim asuransi yang tidak dipenuhi penanggung berdasarkan hukum positif. Syiar Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.29313/sh.v16i1.5130
Attamimi, Z. F., Disemadi, H. S., & Santoso, B. (2019). Prinsip Syariah dalam penyelenggaraan bank wakaf mikro sebagai perlindungan hak spiritual nasabah. Jurnal Jurisprudence, 9(2), 117–132. https://doi.org/10.23917/jjr.v9i2.8897
Diba, N. F., Disemadi, H. S., & Prananingtyas, P. (2020). Kebijakan tata kelola Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK) di Indonesia. Ekspose: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Dan Pendidikan, 18(2), 868–876. https://doi.org/10.30863/ekspose.v18i2.485
Disemadi, H. S., & Prananingtyas, P. (2019). Perlindungan hukum terhadap nasabah perbankan pengguna CRM (Cash Recycling Machine). Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal), 8(3), 286. https://doi.org/10.24843/JMHU.2019.v08.i03.p07
Hartono. (1997). Hukum Asuransi dan Perusahaan Asuransi. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Hermawati. (2016). Perlindungan hukum tertanggung dalam pembayaran klaim asuransi jiwa. TAFAQQUH: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Dan Ahwal Syahsiyah, 1(2). Retrieved from http://ejournal.kopertais4.or.id/sasambo/index.php/tafaqquh/article/view/3047
Husain, F. (2016). Perlindungan Hukum terhadap pemegang polis asuransi menurut UU No. 40 Tahun 2014 tentang Perasuransian. Lex Crimen, 5(6). Retrieved from https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/13468
Ikram, F. D., Njatrijani, R., & Lestari, S. N. (2016). Perlindungan hukum kepada tertanggung PT MAA General Assurance dalam hal dicabutnya izin usaha perusahaan oleh Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK). Diponegoro Law Journal, 5(4). Retrieved from https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/dlr/article/view/13740
Ningsih, A. S., & Disemadi, H. S. (2019). Breach of contract: an Indonesian experience in akad credit of sharia banking. Ijtihad : Jurnal Wacana Hukum Islam Dan Kemanusiaan, 19(1), 89–102. https://doi.org/10.18326/ijtihad.v1i1.89-102
Ningsih, A. S., Suprapti, D. D., & Fibrianti, N. (2019). The importance of applying the membership value toward savings and loans cooperatives in Indonesia. Sriwijaya Law Review, 3(2). Retrieved from http://journal.fh.unsri.ac.id/index.php/sriwijayalawreview/article/view/235
Prabowo, M. S., & Umami, Y. Z. (2018). The existence of a company in the society and its legality in Indonesian Law. Journal of Private and Commercial Law, 2(1), 33–46. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpcl.v2i1.13962
Putri, D. A., & Rahayu, S. W. (2019). Mekanisme perlindungan konsumen usaha asuransi oleh Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 21(1), 129–144. https://doi.org/10.24815/kanun.v21i1.12412
Putriyanti, E. D., & Wijayanta, T. (2010). Kajian hukum tentang penerapan pembuktian sederhana dalam perkara kepailitan asuransi. Mimbar Hukum, 22(3). Retrieved from https://journal.ugm.ac.id/jmh/article/view/16240
Rahardjo, I. (2018). Nasib nasabah pasca izin asuransi dicabut. Retrieved December 12, 2019, from CNBC Indonesia website: https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/opini/20180119150856-14-2003/nasib-nasabah-pasca-izin-asuransi-dicabut
Setiawati, N. S. (2018). Perlindungan hukum terhadap pemegang polis asuransi dalam menyelesaikan sengketa klaim asuransi. SPEKTRUM HUKUM, 15(1), 150. https://doi.org/10.35973/sh.v15i1.1115
Surana, N. B. (2016). Kajian yuridis perlindungan hukum tertanggung pada perjanjian asuransi kendaraan bermotor di PT. Asuransi Ramayana TBK. Jakarta. Jurnal Idea Hukum, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jih.2016.2.1.27
Triana, M. (2016). Analisis yuridis terhadap polis asuransi kendaraan bermotor pada PT. Asuransi Raya Cabang Medan. Jurnal Mercatoria, 9(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31289/mercatoria.v9i1.320.g856
Ulya, I. R. (2016). Perlindungan hukum nasabah pasca pencabutan izin usaha Perusahaan asuransi Jiwa Bumi Asih Jaya (BAJ) oleh Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK) (Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta). Retrieved from http://repository.uinjkt.ac.id/dspace/handle/123456789/30536
