Mediation in the Conflict of Legislation Resolution based on the Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights Number 2 of 2019
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26555/novelty.v10i2.a13919Keywords:
Conflict of Norms, Conflict of Legislation, ResolutionAbstract
Introduction to The Problem: The authority possessed by the Ministry of Law and Human Rights after the enactment of Permenkumham No. 2 of 2019 this then raises problems both juridical and theoretical. Because it was explored further, no formula was found that regulates the authority of the Ministry of Law and Human Rights (in this case the Directorate General of Legislation) to harmonize legislation through mediation, both in Law No. 39 of 2008 concerning the State Ministry and Presidential Regulation No. 44 of 2015 concerning the Ministry of Law and Human Rights. In addition, the mediation mechanism used in resolving the harmonization of laws and regulations is a mistake, because it is not appropriate if the mediation mechanism is applied in the harmonization of laws and regulations that are public (public).
Purpose/Objective Study: This paper objects are about the authority of the Minister of Law and Human Rights in the formation of Permenkumham No. 2 of 2019 and whether the Ministry of Law and Human Rights has the authority to mediate the disharmony of laws and regulations; then the next discussion about the mechanism and legal impact arising from the mediation.
Design/Methodology/Approach: This paper used qualitative research method with juridical-normative as an analysis approach.
Findings: the statutory regulations which are used as a basis to remember in Permenkumham No. 2 of 2019 no explicit delegation was found which ordered the formation of Permenkumham No. 2 of 2019, including the formulation which regulates the authority of the Directorate General of Legislation in completing the disharmony of legislation through mediation. Then in the case of mediation mechanism is a mechanism that is usually applied in cases that are private, where the parties act for and on their own behalf. so it becomes strange if mediation is used in resolving conflicting norms of laws and regulations which norms generally regulate, moreover the results of the mediation do not have binding legal force and do not provide legal impact on the validity of the norms of the agreed laws and regulations.
Paper Type: Research Article
References
Aditya, Z. F., & Winata, M. R. (2018). Rekonstruksi hierarki peraturan perundang-undangan di Indonesia. Negara Hukum, 9(1), 79–100. https://doi.org/10.22212/jnh.v9i1.976
Antariksa, B. (2017). Penerapan hierarki peraturan perundang- undangan dalam ketatanegaran indonesia. Deliberatif Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 1(1), 24-41. Retrieved from http://ojs.uscnd.ac.id/index.php/deliberatif/article/view/8
Armia, M. S. (2017). Mahkamah konstitusi dan pengujian undang-undang: Pembelajaran bagi Indonesia. Negara Hukum, 8(1), 107–130. https://doi.org/10.22212/jnh.v8i1.940
Astomo, P. (2018). Supervision of local government to village regulation in regional autonomy are reviewed theory. Indonesia Prime, 2(1), 45–49. https://doi.org/10.29209/id.v2i1.18
Attamimi, A. H. S. (1990). Peran keputusan presiden Republik Indonesia dalam penyelenggaraan pemerintahan negara; Suatu studi analisis mengenai keputusan Presiden yang berfungsi pengaturan dalam kurun waktu Pelita I-Pelita IV. Universitas Indonesia. Unpublished Thesis.
Aziz, M. (2010). Pengujian peraturan perundang-undangan
dalam sistem peraturan perundang-undangan Indonesia.
Jurnal Konstitusi, 7(5), 113–150. Retrieved from http://ejournal.mahkamahkonstitusi.go.id/index.php/jk/article/view/248
Frew, K. (2013). Hans Kelsen’s theory and the key to his normativist dimension. The West Australian Jurist, 4(285), 285–293. Retrieved from https://www.murdoch.edu.au/School-of-Law/_document/Publications/The-Western-Australian-Jurist/4WAJ285---Frew.pdf
Garner, B. A. (2010). Black’s law dictionary (9th ed.). USA: Thomson Reuters.
Hermawan, B. (2017). Pelaksanaan wewenang Wakil Presiden dalam penyelenggaraan pemerintahan. Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist, 2(1), 24–34. https://doi.org/10.35326/volkgeist.v2i1.102
Hoesein, Z. A. (2006). Pengujian peraturan perundang-undangan menurut konstitusi Indonesia studi tentang perkembangan pengaturan dan pelaksanaanya oleh Mahkamah Agung RI dalam kurun waktu 1970-2003. Universitas Indonesia. Unpublishes Thesis
Hsb, A. M. (2017). Kegentingan yang memaksa dalam pembentukan
peraturan pemerintah pengganti undang-undang.
Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 14(1), 109–122. Retrieved from http://ditjenpp.kemenkumham.go.id/jurnal/index.php/jli/article/view/27
Huda, N. (2008). Urgensi judicial review dalam tata hukum Indonesia.
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 15(1), 101–120. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol15.iss1.art5
Indrati, M. F. (2007). Ilmu perundang-undangan, jenis, fungsi, dan materi muatan. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Kadarsih, S. (2010). Tugas dan wewenang Ombudsman Republik Indonesia dalam pelayanan publik menurut UU No. 37 Tahun 2008. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 10(2), 175–182. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2010.10.2.150
Kelsen, H. (2006). General theory of law and state. London: Transaction Publisher.
Mustamu, J. (2011). Diskresi dan tanggungjawab administrasi pemerintahan. Jurnal Sasi, 17(2), 1–9. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2p40SKy
Nawiasky, H. (1941). Allgemeine rechtslehre als system der rechtlichen grundbegriffe. Benziger.
Sadjijono. (2008). Memahami beberapa bab pokok hukum administrasi. Yogyakarta: Pressindo.
Sjarif, F. A. (2015). Pembentukan peraturan delegasi dari Undang-Undang pada kurun waktu 1999-2012. Universitas Indonesia. Unpublished Thesis
Sjarif, F. A. (2017). Gaya perumusan kalimat perintah pembentukan peraturan yang menjalankan delegasi dari undang-undang di Indonesia.
Pakuan Law Review, 3(2), 31–50. Retrieved from https://journal.unpak.ac.id/index.php/palar/article/view/396
Sudrajat, T., Raharjo, A., Wasi Bintoro, R., & Saefudin, Y. (2018). Harmonization of regulation in water territorial management becoming a fair economic benefit distribution towards regional autonomy. E3S Web of Conferences, 47, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20184706004
Suherman, P. K. (2017). Delegasi regulasi dan simplifikasi regulasi
dalam pembentukan Peraturan Kepala Daerah.
Jurnal Advokasi FH UNMAS, 7(1), 1–11. Retrieved from http://jurnal.unmas.ac.id/index.php/advokasi/article/view/702
Sukardi, & Widiati, E. P. (2012). Pendelegasian pengaturan oleh Undang-Undang kepada Peraturan yang lebih rendah dan akibat hukumnya. Yuridika, 27(2), 141–156. https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v27i2.293
Wicaksono, D. A. (2013). Implikasi re-eksistensi Tap Mpr dalam hierarki peraturan perundang- undangan terhadap jaminan atas kepastian hukum yang adil di Indonesia. Jurnal Konstitusi, 10(1), 143–178. Retrieved from http://consrev.mkri.id/index.php/jk/article/view/99
Yuliani, A. (2017). Daya ikat pengundangan peraturan perundang-undangan. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 14(4), 429–438. Retrieved from http://e-jurnal.peraturan.go.id/index.php/jli/article/view/121
Zakaria, E. H. P. (2019). Legislative review dewan perwakilan rakyat
terhadap peraturan pemerintah pengganti undang-undang.
Lex Administratum, 7(1), 62-70. Retrieved from https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/administratum/article/view/24546
