Strategi Evaluasi Program Perkuliahan Biologi Berbasis Blended Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26555/bioedukatika.v5i2.7292Keywords:
biology course program, blended learning, CIPP evaluation model, literasi ICTAbstract
Paradigma pendidikan pada abad 21 telah mengalami pergeseran, salah satu komponen pentingnya adalah tolls for working dalam pembelajaran harus berorientasi pada information literacy dan ICT literacy. Atas dasar hal tersebut, dalam pembelajaran/ perkuliahan khususnya biologi diperlukan adanya integrasi penggunaan teknologi. Blended learning adalah salah satu program perkuliahan yang dapat diterapkan untuk mengadaptasikan kompetensi abad 21. Tujuan implementasi program perkuliahan biologi berbasis blended learning adalah untuk meningkatkan penguasaan konsep mahasiswa melalui kemudahan akses informasi; melatih higher order tinking skills mahasiswa (berpikir kritis, kreatif, pemecahan masalah, komunikasi dan argumentasi); melatih literasi mahasiswa, terutama literasi ICT yang digunakan dalam perkuliahan. Dalam implementasi program tersebut diperlukan strategi evaluasi yang tepat, agar pelaksanaannya dapat dimonitoring dan dievaluasi dengan baik. Model CIPP (contect, input, process dan product) merupakan strategi evaluasi yang relevan, karena memiliki relevansi karakteristik antara model CIPP dengan program yang dirancang. Program perkuliahan blended learning dievaluasi secara komprehensif dengan model evaluasi CIPP, mulai dari kesiapan pra pelaksanaan program, pelaksanaan, hingga diperoleh produk. Hasil evaluasi dari program ini dijadikan sebagai rekomendasi bagi pemangku kebijakan untuk mengambil keputusan terhadap keberlanjutan program yang dirancang.
Â
Evaluation Strategy of Biology Course Program Based on Blended Learning. The educational paradigm of the 21st century has been shifting, one of the important components is tools for working in learning must be oriented to information literacy and ICT literacy. On the basis of this, in the learning/ lectures, especially biology required the integration of the use of technology. Blended learning is one of the course programs that can be applied to adopt 21st-century competency. The purpose of the implementation of biology course program based on blended learning is to improve students' mastery of the concept through ease of access to information; training higher order thinking skills of students (critical thinking, creative, problem solving, communication and argumentation); train student literacy, especially ICT literacy used in lectures. In the implementation of the program requires appropriate evaluation strategy, so that its implementation can be monitored and evaluated properly. The CIPP model (Context, Input, Process, and Product) is a relevant evaluation strategy because it has characteristic relevance between the CIPP model and the designed program. Blended learning lecture program is evaluated comprehensively with CIPP evaluation model, ranging from pre-program preparation, implementation, to the product. The results of the evaluation of this program serve as a recommendation for stakeholders to make decisions on the sustainability of the designed program.
References
Arabasz, P., & Baker, M. B. (2003). Evolving campus support models for E-learning courses. Educause Center for applied research.
Basori. (2010). Peningkatan kualitas pembelajaran mata kuliah chasis dan body dengan model blended learning (Perpaduan antara traditional learning dan e-learning). Yogyakarta.
Bonk, C. J., Kim, K., & Zeng, T. (2006). Future directions of blended learning in higher education and workplace learning settings. In C. J.
Bonk & C. R. Graham (Ed.), The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local design (hal. 550–567). San Francisco: Pfeiffer.
Carman, J. M. (2005). Blended learning design: Five key ingredients. Diambil dari http://www.agilantlearning.com/pdf/Blended Learning Design.pdf
Firman, H. (2008). Monitoring and evaluation strategy of lesson study programme (strategi monitoring dan evaluasi program lesson study). In International Conference on Lesson Study. Bandung: FMIPA Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
Fitzpatrick, J. L., Sanders, J. R., & Worthen, B. R. (2012). Program evaluation alternative approaches and practical guidelines (forth). New Jersey: Pearson Education.
Griffin, P., & Care, E. (Ed.). (2015). Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9395-7
Herrenkohl, L. R., Tasker, T., & White, B. (2011). Pedagogical practices to support classroom cultures of scientific inquiry. Cognition and instruction, 29(1), 1–44.
Marquis, C. (2004). WebCT survey discovers a blend of online learning and classroom-based teaching is the most effective form of learning today. WebCT. com.
Reay, J. (2001). Blended learning-a fusion for the future. Knowledge Management Review, 4(3), 6.
Rooney, J. E. (2003). Blending learning opportunities to enhance educational programming and meetings. Association Management (Vol. 55).
Roshayanti, F. (2012). Pengembangan model asesmen argumentatif untuk mengukur keterampilan argumentasi mahasiswa pada konsep fisiologi manusia. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Program Pendidikan IPA, Sekolah Pascasarjana. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
Royse, D. D., Thyer, B. A., & Padgett, D. (2015). Program evaluation : an introduction to an evidence-based approach (sixth edit). Boston: Cengage Learning.
Schmidt, K. (2002). The web-enhanced classroom. of Industrial Technology, 18(2), 2–6.
Stufflebeam, D. L. (1971). The relevance of the CIPP evaluation model for educational accountability. Atlantic City, New Jersey.
Surjono, H. D. (2013). Membangun Course E-Learning Berbasis Moodle (kedua). Yogyakarta: UNY Press.
Widoyoko, E. P. (2009). Evaluasi program pembelajaran (Kedelapan). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with Jurnal Bioedukatika agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
