Miskonsepsi ekologi: Sebuah analisis hasil tes kompetisi sains Madrasah Aliyah

Authors

  • Jahidin Jahidin Universitas Halu Oleo, Kendari
  • La Rabani Universitas Halu Oleo, Kendari

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26555/bioedukatika.v6i1.7287

Keywords:

Ecological material, Kompetisi sains, Madrasah Aliyah, Miskonsepsi, Miscopception, Science competition

Abstract

Miskonsepsi materi ekologi adalah kesalahpahaman konsep atau sub konsep ekologi yang menyimpang dari kaidah-kaidah ilmiah. Kajian ini menjadi rujukan guru biologi Madrasah Aliyah (MA) dalam mereduksi miskonsepsi ekologi sebelum pelaksanaan lomba Kompetisi Sains Madrasah (KSM). Penelitian ini bertujuan mengungkap persentase miskonsepsi materi ekologi dan menyusun deskripsi miskonsepsi pada setiap sub materi ekosistem, bioremediasi, konservasi, pencemaran, populasi, adaptasi, dan simbiosis. Instrumen tes yang digunakan adalah soal KSM-MA Kementerian Agama Republik Indonesia tahun 2017. Persentase soal materi ekologi adalah 15% dari total soal 100 nomor dengan gradasi 3 butir soal adaptasi, 3 butir soal pencemaran, 2 butir soal simbiosis, 3 butir soal ekosistem, dan masing-masing 1 butir soal populasi, komunitas, konservasi, dan bioremediasi. Subyek penelitian adalah peserta lomba KSM-MA Provinsi Sulawesi Tenggara tahun 2017 berjumlah 14 siswa, yaitu peserta dari 12 Kabupaten dan 2 Kota Madya. Analisis miskonsepsi melibatkan dua tahap kegiatan, yaitu pengidentifikasian dan pendeskripsian miskonsepsi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan miskonsepsi materi ekologi mencapai 64%. Miskonsepsi terjadi pada semua sub materi dengan persentase yang berbeda, yaitu konservasi, bioremediasi, pupulasi, pencemaran, ekosistem, adaptasi, komunitas, dan simbiosis. Persentase miskonsepsi tertinggi terjadi pada sub materi konservasi, sedangkan terendah terjadi pada sub materi simbiosis.

Misconception Ecology: An Analysis Of The Test Results Of Sains Madrasah Aliyah Competition. The misconception of ecological material is a misunderstanding of ecological concepts or sub-concepts that deviate from scientific rules. This study is important because it is the reference of the biology teacher of Madrasah Aliyah (MA) in reducing the ecological misconception before the implementation of the Madrasah Science Competition (KSM). This study aims to reveal the percentage of misconceptions of ecological material and develop a description of misconception on each sub-material ecosystem, bioremediation, conservation, pollution, population, adaptation, and symbiosis. The test instrument used is the KSM-MA of the Ministry of Religious Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia in 2017. The percentage of ecological matter is 15% out of a total of 100 questions. Gradation item consists of 3 items about adaptation, 3 items about contamination, 3 items about symbiosis, 2 items about ecosystem, and each 1 item about population, community, conservation, and bioremediation. The subjects were 14 participants of KSM-MA contest in Southeast Sulawesi Province in 2017. The contestants came from 12 regencies and 2 municipalities. Misconception analysis involves two stages of activity, the identification and description of misconception. The results showed 64% misconception of ecological material. Sub-material with a misconception level below 50% occurs in the symbiotic and the community, while the misconception level above 50% includes ecosystems, pollution, bioremediation, population, and conservation.

Author Biographies

Jahidin Jahidin, Universitas Halu Oleo, Kendari

Pendidikan Biologi, Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan

La Rabani, Universitas Halu Oleo, Kendari

PGSD FKIP, Universitas Halu Oleo

References

Andrews, T. M., Price, R. M., Mead, L. S., McElhinny, T. L., Thanukos, A., Perez, K. E., Lemons, P. P. (2017). Biology Undergraduates Misconceptions about Genetic Drift. CBE Life Sciences Education, 11(3), 248-259. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.11-12-0107

Beals, A. M., Krall, R. M., & Wymer, C. L. (2012). Energy Flow through an Ecosystem: Conceptions of In-service Elementary and Middle School Teachers. International Journal of Biology Education, 2(1). Diambil dari www.ijobed.com

Cetin, G., Ertepinar, H., & Geban, O. (2015). Effects of conceptual change text based instruction on ecology, attitudes toward biology and environment. Educational Research and Reviews, 10(3), 259-273. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2014.2038

Deshmukh, N. D., & Deshmukh, V. M. (2007). A study of students misconceptions in biology at the secondary school level. In International conference to review research in Science, Technology and Mathematics Education. Mumbai, India: Homi Bhabha Centre for Science Education, TIFR. Diambil dari http://www.hbcse.tifr.res.in/episteme/episteme-2/e-proceedings/deshmukh

Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Islam. (2017). Petunjuk teknis Kompetisi Sains madrasah 2017. Jakarta.

Dixon, N. M., & M., N. (2000). Common knowledge : how companies thrive by sharing what they know. Harvard Business School Press. Diambil dari https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=518642

Eldredge, N. (2002). Life on earth : an encyclopedia of biodiversity, ecology, and evolution. ABC-CLIO.

Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., Jacobsen, D. R., & Bullock, T. (1990). Tools for Learning: A Guide to Teaaing Study Skills. Alexandria, Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Diambil dari https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED320126.pdf

Indriani, D. E. (2016). Perangkat Pembelajaran Model Cooperative Scripts Untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep dan Mengeliminasi Miskonsepsi IPA pada Siswa Sekolah Dasar. JURNAL BIOEDUKATIKA, 4(2), 30. https://doi.org/10.26555/bioedukatika.v4i2.5296

Jahidin, J. (2015a). Dampak pelatihan terhadap kompetensi pedagogik guru biologi Sekolah Menengah Atas. Jurnal Ilmiah BioSmart, 2(2), 20-31.

Jahidin, J. (2015b). Pengaruh diklat OSN IPA-materi biologi terhadap keterampilan berpikir kritis dan kreatif guru pelatih OSN IPA SD dan SMP. Biodidaktis: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 6(4), 192-199.

Karl, S. A., Toonen, R. J., Grant, W. S., & Bowen, B. W. (2012). Common misconceptions in molecular ecology: echoes of the modern synthesis. Molecular Ecology, 21(17), 4171-4189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05576.x

Kaur, G. (2013). A review of selected literature on causative agents and identification strategies of students misconceptions. Journal of Educationia Confab, 2(11), 79-94.

Kse, S. (2008). Diagnosing Student Misconceptions: Using Drawings as a Research Method. World Applied Sciences Journal, 3(2), 283-293. Diambil dari http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.388.382&rep=rep1&type=pdf

Magno, C. (2016). The Effect Size of Self-Regulation and Prior Knowledge on Students Performance in an Open High School Program. The International Journal of Research and Review, 11. Diambil dari https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2892190

Margalita, S., Rachmadiarti, F., & Prastiwi, M. S. (2015). Analisis miskonsepsi tertinggi materi ekologi pada siswa sekolah menengah atas (SMA). Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Biologi (BioEdu), 4(3), 996-1001.

Murat, M., Kanadli, S., & Anien, A. (2011). Seventh Grade Students Misconceptions about Animal Reproduction, Growth and Development and Their Likely Resources. Journal of TURKISH SCIENCE EDUCATION, 8(1), 179-197. Diambil dari http://www.tused.org/internet/tused/archive/v8/i1/text/tusedv8i1a10.pdf

National Research Council, C. on U. S. E. (1997). Science Teaching Reconsidered: a Handbook. Washington: National Academies Press

Nehm, R. H., & Reilly, L. (2007). Biology Majors Knowledge and Misconceptions of Natural Selection. BioScience, 57(3), 263-272. https://doi.org/10.1641/B570311

Purwati, S. (2016). Pengaruh Kemampuan Awal terhadap Pemahaman Konsep Usaha dan Energi. In Prosiding SNFA (Seminar Nasional Fisika dan Aplikasinya) (hal. 100). Surakarta: Universitas Sebelas Maret. https://doi.org/10.20961/prosidingsnfa.v1i0.4522

Rittner, D., & McCabe, T. L. (2004). Encyclopedia of Biology. New York: Facts On File, Inc.

Ycel, E., & zkan, M. (2015). Determination of secondary school students cognitive structure, and misconception in ecological concepts through word association test. Educational Research and Review, 10(5), 660-674. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2014.2022

Downloads

Published

2018-06-30

Issue

Section

Articles