Pengaruh Penerapan Hypothetico-deductive Reasoning dalam Learning Cycle terhadap Keterampilan Proses Sains dan Pemahaman Konsep Siswa

Authors

  • Yohn Ade Ardiyansyah SMK, YPKK 2 Sleman, Yogyakarta
  • Paidi Paidi Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26555/bioedukatika.v5i1.6027

Keywords:

hypothetico-deductive reasoning (HDR), siklus belajar, keterampilan proses sains (KPS), pemahaman konsep

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh penerapan hypothetico-deductive reasoning (HDR) dalam learning cycle terhadap keterampilan proses sains (KPS) dan pemahaman konsep siswa. Penelitian ini berbentuk kuasi-eksperimen dengan desain pretest-postest non-equivalent control group yaitu kelas A sebagai kelompok eksperimen bermodelkan HDR-Learning Cycle (HDR-LC), serta kelompok kontrol yaitu kelas B bermodelkan Learning Cycle (LC) dan kelas C bermodelkan Direct Instruction (DI). Sumber data KPS-intelektual dan pemahaman konsep diperoleh dengan instrumen tes sedangkan KPS-manual diperoleh dengan observasi performansi. Data dianalisis dengan MANOVA dilanjutkan uji Bonferroni, atau uji Kruskal-Wallis dilanjutkan uji Games-Howell untuk data nonparametrik. Hasil penelitian ini yaitu: (a) penerapan HDR-LC (mean: 86,4) secara signifikan berpengaruh positif terhadap KPS-intelektual dibandingkan model LC (mean: 78,3) dan DI (mean: 75,1). Sedangkan KPS-manual kelas HDR-LC (mean: 64,3) dibandingkan kelas LC (mean: 87,4) dan DI (mean: 82,3) terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan dengan pengaruh negatif. (b) penerapan HDR-LC (mean: 84,8) secara signifikan berpengaruh potisif terhadap pemahaman konsep siswadibandingkan model LC (mean: 61,7) dan DI (mean: 66,6).

Author Biography

Paidi Paidi, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta

Pendidikan Biologi FMIPA

References

Arends, R.I. (1997). Classroom instruction and management. Toronto: McGraw-Hill.

Bybee, R. W., & Fuchs, B. (2006). Preparing the 21st century workforce: a new reform in science and technology education. of Research in Science Teaching, (43), 349-352.

Depburman, S. K. (2002). Learning how scientists work: experiential research projects to promote cell learning and scientific process skills. of Research in Science Teaching, 1(4): 154-172.

Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2014). Konsep dan implementasi kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Kemdikbud.

Klahr, D. & M. Nigam. (2004). The equivalence of learning paths in early science instruction: effects of direct instruction and discovery learning. Psychological Science, 2004: 1-11.

Lavoie, Derrick R. (1999). Effects of emphasizing hypothetico-predictive reasoning within the science learning cycle on high school students process skill and conceptual understandings in . of Research in Science Teaching, 36 (10), 1127-1147.

Lawson, A.E. (2000a). A learning cycle approach to teach osmosis. The American Teacher, 62 (3), 189-196.

Lawson, A.E. (2009). basic inferences of scientific reasoning, argumentation, and discovery. Science Education, 336-364.

Lee, C.Q., & She H.C. 2010. Facilitating students conceptual change and scientific reasoning involving the unit of combustion. Research Science Education, (40), 479-504.

Rustaman, N.Y. (2005). Strategi belajar mengajar , cetakan 1. Malang: UM Press.

Suprihatiningrum, J. (2013). Strategi pembelajaran: teori dan aplikasi. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.

Suryani, W., Suyatno, & Erman. (2015). Penerapan model pembelajaran siklus belajar hipotetik-deduktif pada materi larutan asam-basa untuk meningkatkan penguasaan konsep siswa. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Kimia Universitas Negeri Surabaya, 109-114.

Taufiq & Ketang W. (2009). The application of hypothetical deductive learning cycle learning model to improve senior high school students science generic skills on rigid body equilibrium. Proceeding of 3rd International Seminar on Science Education: Challenging Science Education in The Digital Era, 641-648.

Turkmen, H. & E. Usta. (2007). The role of learning cycle approach overcoming misconceptions in science. Kastamonu Education , 15 (2), 491-500.

Weld, J., Stier M., & Birren J. M. (2011). The development of a novel measure of scientific reasoning growth among college freshmen: the constructive inquiry science reasoning skills test. Research and Teaching, 40 (4), 101-107.

Zohar, A. (1996). Transfer and retention of reasoning strategies taught in cal contexts. Research in Science & Technological Education, 14 (2), 205-219.

Downloads

Published

2017-06-04

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 1 (2017)

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with Jurnal Bioedukatika agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.