Blended-problem based learning: critical thinking skills and information literacy in cell learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26555/bioedukatika.v8i2.14315Keywords:
Blended-PBL, Google Classroom, Information Literacy, Critical thinking, CellAbstract
Critical thinking skills and information literacy are two competencies that students need to have in the millennial era that is loaded with a wide range of types and sources of information. This research was conducted to investigate the effectiveness of blended-problem based learning through Google Classroom application to increase students critical thinking and information literacy in material about cell. This research was a quasi-experimental with pretest-posttest control group design. Two classes were selected randomly from eight Mathematics and Natural Science (MIPA) grade XI classes in state high school of SMA Negeri 1 Majalengka. The experiment group experienced blended-problem based learning and the control group received a conventional-problem based learning (PBL). Critical thinking skills were measured through a test consisting of essay questions with a reliability of 0.73. Information literacy competency was measured through a questionnaire using 26 items that had been tested for validity and reliability, resulting in an alpha coefficient of 0.896. Data were analyzed quantitatively using independent t-test and produced p-value of 0.021 and 0.018 for critical thinking skills and information literacy respectively. This shows that statistically there are significant differences in students critical thinking skills and information literacy between blended-PBL and conventional-PBL. This research indicates that the blended-PBL strategy can be implemented as a learning strategy, especially in Biology to prepare students for the 21st century challenges.References
American Association of School Librarians, & Association for Educational Communications and Technology. (1998). Information literacy standards for student learning: Standards and indicators. Retrieved from https://www.ala.org/ala/aasl/aaslproftools/informationpower/InformationLiteracyStandards_final.pdf
Association of College and Research Libraries. (2000). Information literacy competency standards for higher education. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/informationliteracycompetency
Back, D. A., Haberstroh, N., Antolic, A., Sostmann, K., Schmidmaier, G., & Hoff, E. (2014). Blended learning approach improves teaching in a problem-based learning environment in orthopedics - a pilot study. BMC Medical Education, 14(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-17
Derby, C., & Williams, F. (2010). The impact of problem based Learning, blended-problem based learning, and traditional lecture on student’s academic achievement in education. In J. Sanchez & K. Zhang (Eds.), E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 50–55). Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/35509/
Dogan, N. (2017). Blending problem based learning and history of science approaches to enhance views about scientific inquiry: New wine in an old bottle. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 5(10), 99–112. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v5i10.2646
Facione, P. A. (2011). Critical thinking: what it is and why it counts. Retrieved from https://www.student.uwa.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/1922502/Critical-Thinking-What-it-is-and-why-it-counts.pdf Kazu, I. Y., &
Demirkol, M. (2014). Effect of blended learning environment model on high school students’ academic achievement. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 13(1), 78–87. Retrieved from https://files.
eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1018177.pdf
Khoiriyah, U., Roberts, C., Jorm, C., & Van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2015). Enhancing students’ learning in problem based learning: validation of a self-assessment scale for active learning and critical thinking. BMC Medical Education, 15(1), 140. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0422-2
Kong, S. C. (2014). Developing information literacy and critical thinking skills through domain knowledge learning in digital classrooms: An experience of practicing flipped classroom strategy. Computers & Education, 78, 160–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.05.009 Kwan, L. S. L., &
Yunus, M. M. (2015). Group participation and interaction in ESL wiki collaborative writing among malaysian gifted students. Asian Social Science, 11(2), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v11n2p59
Leibiger, C. A. (2011). “Google reigns triumphant”?: stemming the tide of googlitis via collaborative, situated information literacy instruction. Journal Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian, 30(4), 187–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639269.2011.628886
Pinheiro, P. A. (2012). Collaborative writing by means of digital tools: resignifying textual production in the school context. International Research Journal of Arts and Social Sciences, 1(1), 8–21. Retrieved from https://www.interesjournals.org/articles/collaborative-writing-by-means-of-digital-tools-resignifying-textual-production-in-the-school-context.pdf
Riadi, E. (2016). Statistika penelitian: Analisis manual dan IBM SPSS. Yogyakarta: Andi offset.
Saliba, R., Mussleman, P., Fernandes, M., & Bendriss, R. (2017). Promoting information literacy of pre-medical students through project-based learning: a pilot study. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 5(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.5n.4p.1
Schiffl, I. (2018). How information literate are junior and senior class biology students? Research in Science Education, 50, 773–789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9710-2
Triyanto, S. A., Prayitno, B. A., & Probosari, R. M. (2014). Penerapan model pembelajaran blended-problem solving melalui aplikasi moodle untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa kelas X-1 SMAN 3 Surakarta tahun pelajaran 2012/2013. BIO-PEDAGOGI: Jurnal Pembelajaran Biologi, 3(1), 99–108. Retrieved from https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/pdg/article/view/5326
Vesisenaho, M., Valtonen, T., Kukkonen, J., Havu-Nuutinen, S., Hartikainen, A., & Karkkainen, S. (2010). Blended learning with everyday technologies to activate students’collaborative learning. Science Education International, 21(4), 272–283. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ907048.pdf
Wenger, K. (2014). Problem-Based Learning and information literacy: A natural partnership. Pennsylvania Libraries: Research & Practice, 2(2), 142–154. https://doi.org/10.5195/PALRAP.2014.61 Yilmaz, M. B., & Orhan, F. (2010). Pre-serviceenglish teachers in blended learning environment in respect to their learning approaches. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9(1), 157–164. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ875779.pdf
Zurkowski, P. G. (1974). The information service environment relationships and priorities. Related paper no. 5. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED100391
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with Jurnal Bioedukatika agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
