Construct validity of critical thinking disposition test in biology

Jayanti Syahfitri, Harry Firman, Sri Redjeki, Siti Sriyati

Abstract


This Research includes seven indicators of Critical Thinking Disposition (CTD), namely truth seeking, open mind, analicity, systematicity, self confidence, inquisitiveness, and maturity. The purpose of this study is to look at the construct validity tests of CTD in biology at Bengkulu State University. This study involved 206 respondents, those are biology education students from Bengkulu State University with a level of study (years 1, 2, 3 and 4). After being analyzed by a Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), the result showed that CTD Test had suitable construct validity. This result is supported by the received value of Convergent Validity which includes factor loading values of more than 0.5, while the Composite Relibility (CR) and Average Extract Variance (AVE) values for the seven indicators of CTD in sequence are Truth Seeking (CR = 0.96, AVE = 0.74), Open Mind (CR = 0.95, AVE = 0.67), Analicity (CR = 0.95, AVE = 0.68), Sistematicity (CR = 0.96, AVE = 0.70), Self Confidence (CR = 0.96, AVE = 0.70), Inquisitiveness (CR = 0.98, AVE = 0.82) and Maturity (CR = 0.95, AVE = 0.66). From the results can be concluded that the construct validity and composite reliability obtained by the test is good.

Keywords


Validity; Construct; Critical thinking disposition; Biology

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bok, D. (2009). Our underachieving colleges: A candid look at how much students learn and why they should be learning more (Revised). Retrieved from https://books.google.com

Bollen, K. A., & Long, J. S. (1993). Testing stuctural equation models. Bury Park: SAGE Publications.

Facione, P. A. (1990). Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and intruction. Retrieved from https://philarchive.org/archive/FACCTA

Facione, P. A. (2000). The disposition toward critical thinking: Its character, measurement, and relationship to critical thinking skill. Informal Logic, 20(1), 61-84. https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v20i1.2254

Facione, P. A., Giancarlo, C. A., Facione, N. C., & Gainen, J. (1995). The disposition toward critical thinking. Journal of General Education, 44(1), 1-25. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net

Foluso, O. (2014). Critical thinking dispositions of nursing faculty in Southwestern Nigeria. IMPACT : International Journal of Research in Applied, Natural and Social Sciences(IMPACT : IJRANSS), 2(8), 127-134. Retrieved from http://www.impactjournals.us/

Foluso, O., & Caserina, T. (2014). Assessment of critical thinking dispositions of nursing students in Southwestern Nigeria. IMPACT : International Journal of Research in Applied, Natural and Social Sciences(IMPACT : IJRANSS), 2(3), 7-16. Retrieved from http://oaji.net/

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104

Furnham, A. (1986). Response bias, social desirability and dissimulation. Personality and Individual Differences, 7(3), 385-400. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(86)90014-0

Ghadi, I., Alwi, N. H., Bakar, K. A., & Talib, O. (2012). Construct validity examination of critical thinking dispositions for undergraduate students in University Putra Malaysia. Higher Education Studies, 2(2), 138-144. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v2n2p138

Hair, J. F. (2011). Multivariate data analysis: An overview. In International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science (pp. 904-907). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04898-2_395

Hongladarom, S. (2007). Asian philosophy and critical thinking: Divergence or convergence? Retrieved from http://pioneer.chula.ac.th/~hsoraj/web/APPEND.html

Marcus, B. (2009). Faking from the applicants perspective: A theory of self-presentation in personnel selection settings. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 17(4), 417-430. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2389.2009.00483.x

Nederhof, A. J. (1985). Methods of coping with social desirability bias: A review. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15(3), 263-280. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420150303

Nieto, A. M., & Valenzuela, J. (2012). A study of the internal structure of critical thinking dispositions. Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines, 27(1), 31-38. https://doi.org/10.5840/inquiryct20122713

Syahfitri, J, Firman, H., Redjeki, S., & Sriyati, S. (2019). Confirmatory factor analysis of critical thinking disposition test in university biology. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1280(3), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1280/3/032001

Syahfitri, Jayanti. (2019). Pengujian validitas dan praktikalitas tes disposisi berpikir kritis dalam biologi (TDBKB). JURNAL PENDIDIKAN SAINS (JPS), 7(1), 30-35. https://doi.org/10.26714/jps.7.1.2019.30-35

Syahfitri, Jayanti, Firman, H., Redjeki, S., & Sriyati, S. (2019). Development and validation of critical thinking disposition test in biology. International Journal of Instruction, 12(4), 381-392. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12425a

Widarjono, A. (2015). Analisis multivariat terapan. Yogyakarta: UPP STIM YKPN.

Widhiarso, W. (2010). Kecenderungan subjek memberikan respon menipu terhadap skala psikologi. Yogyakarta: Universitas Gajah Mada.

Widhiarso, W. (2011). Orientasi kepatutan sosial dan respons tipuan pada alat ukur dalam konteks seleksi kerja. BENEFIT Jurnal Manajemen Dan Bisnis, 15(2), 79-90. Retrieved from https://publikasiilmiah.ums.ac.id/




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26555/bioedukatika.v8i1.11031

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

View J.Bioedukatika Stats

JURNAL BIOEDUKATIKA
ISSN 2338-6630 (Print) | ISSN 2541-5646 (Online)
Organized by Department of Biology Education
Published by Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
Jl.Ringroad Selatan, dk Kragilan, Tamanan, Banguntapan, Bantul, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, Indonesia