THE EFFECTIVENESS OF TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION OF COOPERATIVE LEARNING ON MATHEMATICS LEARNING OUTCOMES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12928/admathedust.v6i8.19315Keywords:
Effectiveness, team assisted individualization (TAI), learning outcomesAbstract
The direct learning method's use affects students' passive participation in classroom activities, resulting in poor mathematics learning outcomes. This study aims to know the effectiveness of team assisted individualization on mathematics learning outcomes of grade VII students of State Junior High School (SMPN) 1 Ngemplak, Sleman Regency in the even semester of the academic year 2017/2018. This study belongs to quantitative research. This study's populations were six classes of grade VII SMPN 1 Ngemplak, Sleman Regency in the even semester of the academic year of 2017/2018. Random sampling technique was applied to take the sample of this research: grade VII students class B in the treatment class; class E in the experiment class using team assisted individualization cooperative learning; and class C in the control class using direct learning model. The research instruments used in this study were multiple-choice tests. The research instruments were tested using a validity test, differential test, and reliability test. The data were analyzed using a normality test, homogeneity test, and hypothesis test for the prerequisite analysis, including t-test. From two-party t-test with  of significance level and  degrees of freedom resulted in . Thus  is rejected. This means that students' mathematics learning outcomes between those taught using team assisted individualization cooperative learning and direct learning.  A one-party t-test with a 5% significance level and  degrees of freedom resulted in . Thus  is rejected; it means that team assisted individualization cooperative learning is more effective than direct learning towards students' mathematics learning outcomes.
References
Hamzah, Ali dan Muhlisrarini. (2014). Perencanaan dan Strategi Pembelajaran Matematika. Jakarta: PT Rajagrafindo Persada.
Shoimin, Aris. (2016). 68 Model Pembelajaran Inovatif dalam Kurikulum 2013. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.
Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 Tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional Pasal 1
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with AdMathEduSt: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Matematika agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License