Industrial Relations with Specific Time Work Agreements after the Decision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 in The Perspective of Legal Justice
Abstract
Introduction to The Problem: The constitutional court decision No. 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 stated that the establishment of Law No. 11 of 2020 on Job Creation contradicts the 1945 Constitution and is considered conditional unconstitutional. Thus, within two years of Law No. 11 of 2020, its derivative rules are still enforced until there is an improvement. However, two years is a legal certainty, but it is uncertain in the business and industrial worlds.
Purpose/Objective Study: This study aims to find out how the effect of the issuance of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia No. 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 on the implementation of Law No. 11 of 2020 on the Employment Cluster and its derivative rules and how alternative efforts in creating harmonious industrial relations on the issue of working relations with Specific Time Work Agreements after the constitutional court decision No. 91/PUU-XVIII/2020.
Design/Methodology/Approach: The research method used is doctrinal legal research.
Findings: This research resulted in a study that the influence of constitutional court decision No. 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 impacts the uncertainty of legal protection guarantees in the business and the industrial world. Because it takes two years to implement the provisions of Law No. 11 of 2020 in the Employment cluster and its derivative rules, namely Government Regulation No. 35 of 2021, the business and the industrial world cannot implement the provisions without any guarantee of sustainable time, and it will lead to injustice in industrial relations. One alternative to continue creating harmonious industrial relations with Specific Time Work Agreements is to return to local wisdom, prioritizing the principle of consensus deliberation that prioritizes the parties' agreement in working relations including the fulfillment of rights in compensation payments when there is a termination of employment.
Paper Type: Research Article
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alotaibi, A. G. (2001). Antecedents of organizational citizenship behavior: A study of public personnel in Kuwait. Public Personnel Management. https://doi.org/10.1177/009102600103000306
Aprianti, N., Safa’at, M. A., & Qurbani, I. D. (2021). Dualisme Model Pengujian Peraturan Daerah Pasca Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 Tentang Cipta Kerja. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 9(2), 472–485. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.29303/ius.v9i2.919
Asshiddiqie, J. (2019). Konstitusi dan konstitusionalisme Indonesia. Sinar Grafika.
Azis, R. A. (2016). Penerapan Perjanjian Kerja Waktu Tertentu (PKWT) Terhadap Pekerja Outsourcing Pasca Putusan MK No. 27/PUU-IX/2011. Lex Jurnalica, 13(3), 146534.
Cakra, I. P. E., & Sulistyawan, A. Y. (2020). Kompabilitas Penerapan Konsep Omnibus Law Dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia. CREPIDO, 2(2), 59–69.
Darmadi, N. S. (2020). Kedudukan dan Wewenang Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Sistem Hukum Ketatanegaraan Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum.
Djumialdji, F. X., & SH, M. (2019). Perjanjian kerja. Sinar Grafika.
Fathammubina, S. H. R. (2018). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja Sepihak Bagi Pekerja. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum
DE’JURE: Kajian Ilmiah Hukum, 3(1), 109–130. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35706/dejure.v3i1.1889
Jason, F., & Tan, D. (2022). Kepastian Hukum Bagi Penanam Modal Asing Sehubungan Dengan Inkonstitusional Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja. UNES Law Review.
Marzuki, P. M. (2021). Pengantar ilmu hukum. books.google.com.
Maulidi, M. A. (2017). Problematika Hukum Implementasi Putusan Final dan Mengikat Mahkamah Konstitusi Perspektif Negara Hukum. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum.
Muhtarom, M. (2014). Asas-Asas Hukum Perjanjian: Suatu Landasan Dalam Pembuatan Kontrak. In Jurnal Suhuf. publikasiilmiah.ums.ac.id.
Nugroho, A. C., & Syarifuddin, S. (2021). Penolakan UU Cipta Kerja 2020
(Analisis Schoemacher & Reese Pemberitaan Cnnindonesia. Com).
Jurnal Komunikasi Korporasi Dan Media, 2(1), 20–67. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30872/jasima.v2i1.24
Prabowo, A. S., Triputra, A. N., Junaidi, Y., & Purwoleksono, D. E. (2020). Politik
Hukum Omnibus Law di Indonesia. Jurnal Pamator, 13(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.21107/pamator.v13i1.6923
Ramadhan, F., Wahid, D. N., & Bilaldzy, A. (2021). Hak Pengelolaan Sejak Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi 91/PUU-XVIII/2020. Jurnal Kawruh Abiyasa.
Rawls, J. (2006). Teori Keadilan: A Theory of Justice. In Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta.
Safa’at, M. A. (2019). Kekuatan Mengikat dan Pelaksaan Putusan MK. In Makalah, Malang Universitas Brawijaya. safaat.lecture.ub.ac.id.
Schmalenbach, K. (2018). Article 26: Pacta sunt servanda. In Vienna Convention on the Law of treaties. https://uni-salzburg.elsevierpure.com/en/publications/article-26-pacta-sunt-servanda
Simamora, J. (2013). Analisa Yuridis Terhadap Model Kewenangan Judicial Review Di Indonesia. Mimbar Hukum, 25(3), https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.16079
Sjaiful, M. (2021). Problematika Normatif Jaminan Hak-Hak Pekerja Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 Tentang Cipta Kerja. Media Iuris.
Sridadi, A. R. (2015). Pedoman Perjanjian Kerja Bersama" Perjanjian Kerja Bersama Antara Pengusaha dan Serikat Pekerja dalam Perspektif Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia". repository.unair.ac.id.
Surya, I. K. A., Nurcana, I. D. N. G., & Antara, I. W. (2020). Kajian Yuridis Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Tenaga Kerja Dalam Perjanjian Kerja Waktu Tertentu (
PKWT) Berdasarkan Undang Undang No 13 Tahun 2003 Tentang
Ketenagakerjaan. Majalah Ilmiah Untab, 17(2), 130–135. https://ojs.universitastabanan.ac.id/index.php/majalah-ilmiah-untab/article/download/90/87
Sutedi, A. (2009). Hukum Perburuhan. Sinar Grafika.
Sutiyoso, B. (2016). Pembentukan Mahkamah Konstitusi Sebagai Pelaku Kekuasaan Kehakiman di Indonesia. Jurnal Konstitusi.
Tampongangoy, F. (2013). Penerapan Sistem Perjanjian Kerja Waktu Tertentu Di Indonesia. Lex Administratum, 1(1), 146–158.
Yudha, H. A. (2010). Hukum Perjanjian, Asas Proporsionalitas Dalam Kontrak Komersial. In Jakarta: Penerbit Kencana Prenada Media Group.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26555/novelty.v13i1.a22545
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Jurnal Hukum Novelty
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Hukum Novelty
ISSN 1412-6834 (Print)
ISSN 2550-0090 (Online)
This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Hukum Novelty has been covered by the following indexing sites:
Jurnal Hukum Novelty is member of:
