Reviewing Information and Electronic Transaction Act from a Convention on Cybercrime of 2001

Wahyu Priyanka Nata Permana

Abstract


Introduction to the Problem: This research analyses the norms of substantive criminal Law regarding Information and Electronic Transaction Act Number No. 11 of 2008 in conjunction with Bill Number 19 of 2016 on Amendments to Information and Electronic Transactions Act No. 11 of 2008 and its compliance with the Convention on Cybercrime, 2001.

Purpose/Objective Study: This research aims to analyze the conformity of offenses, criminal liability, and criminal sanction in the Information and Electronic Transaction Act (IETA) to the principles promulgated in the Convention on Cybercrime, 2001.

Design/Methodology/Approach: This research is a normative legal study using statute and conceptual approaches.

Findings: This study concluded that, in general, offenses regulated in IETA had confirmed the Convention. Nevertheless, the provision of computer-related fraud in IETA has a broader range than that of the Convention. IETA also lacks formulation concerning when and who bears criminal liability for corporate crime as suggested in the Convention. The research also finds that IETA did not adopt the principle of effectiveness and proportionality in promulgating both punishment and treatment. This study suggests that IETA should adopt criminal liability for a corporation, set the penal punishment proportionate to the seriousness of conduct and culpability of the actor, and regulate treatment.

Paper Type: Research Article


Keywords


Substantive Criminal Law, Information and Electronic Transaction Act; Convention on Cybercrime of 2001

Full Text:

PDF

References


Afiyatun, A. W. (2019). Penentuan Kriteria Tindak Pidana Penghinaan

Pasal 45 ayat (1) Juncto Pasal 27 ayat (3) UU ITE Studi Putusan-putusan Pengadilan. Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum, 216-217. https://doi.org/10.32332/istinbath.v16i2.1709

Akbari, A. R. (2017, March). Interpretasi Asimetris Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi di Indonesia Kajian Putusan No 862 K/Pid.Sus/2010. Jurnal Dictum Kajian Putusan Pengadilan, 12, 28.

Ali, M. (2020). Overpenalization dalam Hukum Pidana. Yogyakarta: UII Press.

Ardika, I. K. (2018). Relevansi Sanksi Pidana Bagi Koruptor yang Merugikan Keuangan dan atau Perekonomian Negara . Jurnal Kertha Semaya, 8(6), 882.

Arief, B. N. (2001). Masalah Penegakan Hukum dan Kebijakan Penanggulangan Kejahatan. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Arief, B. N. (2013). Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Ashworth, A. v. (2005). Proportionate Sentencing: Exploring the Principles. New York: Oxford University Press.

Brenner, M. D. (2002). The Emerging Consensus on Criminal Conduct in Cyberspace. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 143-154.

Colvin, E. (1995). Corporate Personality and Criminal Liability. Criminal Law Forum, 8-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01095717

Fairfax, R. A. (2011). From "Overcriminalization" to "Smart on Crime": American Criminal Justice Reform-Legacy and Prospects. Journal of Law, Economic & Policy, 608-609.

Hirsch, A. v. (1990). Proportionality in the Philosophy of Punishment. Criminal Law Forum, 261.

Hirsch, A. v. (1994). Censure and Proportionality. In R. D. Garland, A Reader on Punishment. England: Oxford University Press.

Hodges, M. (2008). CyberCrime: The Reality of the Threat. Journal of High Technology Law, 6.

Hudson, B. A. (1996). Understanding Justice an Introduction to Ideas Perspectives and Controversies in Modern Penal Theory. Philadhelpia: Philadelpia University Press.

Berry, W. W. (2011). Promulgating Proportionality. Gerogia Law Review, 98.

Juniar, A. (2021, July). Mencari Bentuk Pemidanaan Terhadap Pemegang Saham Korporasi . Jurnal Pakuan Law Review, 7(2), 114.

K.Brown, D. (2009). Prosecutors and Overcriminalization: Thoughts on Political Dynamics and a Doctrinal Response. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 461-463.

Luna, E. (2003). Punishment Theory, Holism, and the Procedural Conception of Restorative Justice. Utah Law Review, 216.

Marler, S. L. (2002). The Convention on Cyber Crime: Should the United States Ratify? New England Law Review, 183.

Marzuki, P. M. (2006). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Prenada Media.

Mulasari, L. (2012, April). Ajaran Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi dalam Kebijakan Hukum Pidana di Bidang Mayantara. Jurnal Hukum dan Dinamika Masyarakat, 9(2), 115. http://dx.doi.org/10.36356/hdm.v9i2.301

Murphy, S. D. (2001). Contemporery Practise of United States relating to International Law. Amercian Journal of International Law, 890. https://doi.org/10.2307/2555235

Putri, H. (21-22). Ancaman Pidana terhadap Delik Penghinaan dalam UU ITE. Majalah Info Singkat Hukum, 2016.

Ramli, A. (2003). Perkembangan Cyber Law terhadap Pemanfaatan Teknologi Informasi di Indonesia. Jakarta: Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional.

Rauf, A. (2019, Februari). Aspek Pidana dalam Penyebaran Informasi Melalui Media Elektronik. Prosiding Seminar Ilmiah Sistem Informasi dan Teknologi Informasi, 8(1), 92-93.

Salsa, S. N. (2020). Mutual Legal Assistance dalam Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Manusia melalui Media Sosial sebagai Kejahatan Terorganisasi Transnasional. Procceding National Conference For Law Studies :Pembangunan Hukum Menuju Era Digital Society (p. 1139). Jakarta: Fakultas Hukum UPN Veteran .

Setiyawan, W. B. (2020, November). Upaya Regulasi Teknologi Informasi Dalam Menghadapi Serangan Siber Guna Menjaga Kedaulatan Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia. Jurnal USM Law Review, 3(2), 286-287. http://dx.doi.org/10.26623/julr.v3i2.2773

Sheley, E. L. (2019). Tort Answers to the Problem of Corporate Criminal Mens Rea. North Carolina Law Review, 788-789.

Smith, S. F. (2012). Overcoming Overcriminalization. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 540.

Suartha, I. D. (2018). Kebijakan Hukum Pidana dalam Pertanggungjawaban Tindak Pidana Korporasi di Indonesia. Jurnal Kertha Wicaksana, 12(1), 7-8.

https://doi.org/10.24843/JMHU.2016.v05.i04.p10

Sulisrudatin, N. (2019, September). Analisa Kasus Cyber Crime Bidang Perbankan berupa Modus Pencurian Data Kartu Kredit. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara, 9(1), 31-31. https://doi.org/10.35968/jh.v9i1.296

Supancara, I. B. (2007). Peran Kerjasama Internasional dalam dalam Pencegahan dan Penanggulangan Cyber Crime. Jakarta: Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional.

Suseno, S. (2012). Yurisdiksi Tindak Pidana SIber. Bandung: PT. Refima Aditama.

Todd, H. (2015). Overcriminalization’s New Harm Paradigm. Vanderbilt Law Review, 1197.

Weissmann, A. A. (2007). A New Approach to Corporate Criminal Liability. American Criminal Law Review, 1319.

Wisnusubroto, A. (2011). Konsep Hukum Pidana Telematika. Yogyakarta: UAJY Press.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26555/novelty.v12i2.a17679

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Jurnal Hukum Novelty

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Hukum Novelty

ISSN 1412-6834 (Print)

ISSN 2550-0090 (Online)

Creative Commons License
This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Jurnal Hukum Novelty Stats

 

Jurnal Hukum Novelty is indexed by:

 

   

 

Jurnal Hukum Novelty is member of:

 

Translator/Proofreader Partnership: