Democratization of Legislative Prospective Candidate Selection: Urgency and Its Parameters

Jamaludin Ghafur

Abstract


Introduction to The Problem: One of the most important functions of political parties in a representative democracy is to recruit or select candidates for public officials. One of which is the selection of legislative candidates. Through this function, political parties will determine whether a person has the quality and capacity to be a member of representative and carry out his role well. Article 241 of Law Number 7 of 2017 concerning General Elections mandates that political parties in selecting candidates must be democratically and openly. But, the criteria of democratic selection is not rigidly regulated because they are fully submitted to be regulated in the internal regulations of political parties.

Purpose/Objective Study: This article aims to analyze the urgency of the process of selecting legislative prospective candidate democratically and to find several parameters for the democratic selection of legislative prospective candidate.

Design/Methodology/Approach: This is a normative legal research. The research sources consist of primary law and secondary law. It will also use non-legal material sources. Data collection is carried out through literature study.

Findings: The results of the research are: First, the urgency of the selection of candidates to be democratically because this mechanism promises some benefits for the societies, political parties, and the quality of democracy in general, i.e: The democratic process of selecting candidates is directly proportional to the satisfaction of the wider community towards the democratic system itself; and tending to produce competent and desired candidates by the public, as well as adopting more responsive policies. Second, the parameters or indicators that can be used as guidelines to determine the democratic selection of candidates will consist of 4 (four) indicators, that are: (1) Candidacy; (2) Selectorates; (3) The level of centralization/ decentralization of selection; and (4) How are candidates nominated?

Paper Type: Research Article

 


Keywords


Democratization; Legislative Prospective Candidate Selection; Elections

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aragón, Fernando M, (2014). Why do Parties Use Primaries?: Political Selection Versus Candidate Incentives, Public Choice, Vol. 160, No. 1/2, 205-225. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24507644.

Amal, Ichlasul, (2009). Teori-Teori Mutakhir Partai Politik, Rev.ed, Yogyakarta: PT. Tiara Wacana.

Aylott, Nicholas, (2013). A Question of Priorities: Candidate Selection in Estonian Political Parties, Journal of Baltic Studies, 321-344. https://doi.org/10.1080/01629778.2013.853198.

Akirav, Osnat, (2018). Candidate Selection Methods, Cooperation and Legislative Effectiveness, Review of European Studies; Vol. 10, No. 1, 46-60. https://doi.org/10.5539/res.v10n1p46

Bille, Lars, (2001). Democratizing A Democratic Procedure: Myth or Reality? Candidate Selection in Western European Parties, 1960-1990, Party Politics, Vol 7. No. 3, 363-380. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068801007003006.

Cross, William, (2008). Democratic Norms and Party Candidate Selection: Taking Contextual Factors into Account, Party Politics. Vol 14. No. 5, 596-619. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068808093392.

Dalton, Russell J., (1988). Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies. New Jersey: Chatham House Publisher.

Field, Bonnie N and Siavelis, Peter M, (2008). Candidate Selection Procedures in Transitional Polities: A Research Note, Party Politics. Vol 14. No. 5, 620-639. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068808093393.

Fernandes, J., Geese, L. & Schwemmer, C. (2008). The Impact of Candidate Selection Rules and Electoral Vulnerability on Legislative Behaviour in Comparative Perspective, European Journal of Political Research, Vol. 58, Issue1, 270-291. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12281.

Gaulia, Anika, (2010). Political Parties and Elections: Legislating for Representative Democracy, England: Ashgate Publishing Limited.

Hansen, Bernhard and Saglie, Jo, (2005). Who Should Govern Political Parties? Organizational Values in Norwegian and Danish Political Parties, Scandinavian Political Studies, Vol. 28 – No. 1, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0080-6757.2005.00118.x.

Hooghe, Marc & Kern, Anna, (2013). Party Membership and Closeness and the Development of Trust in Political Institutions, An Analysis of the European Social Survey, 2002-2010, Party Politics, Vol. 21, issue: 6, 944-956. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068813509519.

Hazana, Reuven Y., & Voerman, G., (2006). Electoral Systems

and Candidate Selection, Acta Politica, 41, 146–162. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500153.

Hofmeister, Wilhelm and Grabow, Karsten, (2011). Political Parties Functions and Organisation in Democratic Societies. Singapore: Konrad Adenauer Stiftung.

Mikulska, Anna B. & Scarrow, Susan E, (2010). Assessing the Political Impact of Candidate Selection Rules: Britain in the 1990s, Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, Vol. 20, No. 3, 311-333. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2010.490712.

Mitchell, James and Bradbury, Jonathan, (2004). Political Recruitment and the 2003 Scottish and Welsh Elections: Candidate Selection, Positive Discrimination and Party Adaptation, Representation, Vol. 40, No. 4, 288-301. https://doi.org/10.1080/00344890408523278.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud, (2009). Penelitian Hukum, ed. 5, Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Murray, Rainbow, (2010). Parties, Gender Quotas and Candidate Selection in France, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Meyer, Thomas, (2012). Dari Partai Kepemimpinan Otoriter Ke Partai Massa, cet. 3. Jakarta: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung (FES) Kantor Perwakilan Indonesia.

N., Dewata, M.F. and A., Yulianto, (2010). Dualisme Penelitian Hukum: Normatif dan Empiris, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Rahat, Gideon and Hazan, Reuven, (2001). Candidate Selection Methods: An Analytical Framework, Party Politics. Vol 7. No. 3, 297-322. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068801007003003.

Rahat, Gideon, (2009). Which Candidate Selection Method is the Most Democratic, Government and Opposition, Vol. 44, No. 1, 68-90. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44484165.

Rahat, Gideon, Shapira, Assaf, (2017). An Intra-Party Democracy Index: Theory, Design and A Demonstration, Parliamentary Affairs, Volume 70, Issue 1, 84–110. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsv068.

Sandri, Giulia, (2012). “Perceptions of Intra-Party Democracy and Their Consequences on Activism: A Comparative Analysis of Attitudes and Behaviours of Grass-Roots Party Members”, Paper, Presented at the 22nd World Congress of Political Science, Madrid, July 8-12 2012.

Silvester, Jo, (2012). Recruiting Politicians: Designing Competency Based Selection for UK Parliamentary Candidates. in A. Weinberg (Ed.). (2012). The Psychology of Politicians, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Sanbonmatsu, Kira, (2002). Political Parties and the Recruitment of Women to State Legislatures, The Journal of Politics, Vol. 64, No. 3, 791-809. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-3816.00146.

Seligman, Lester G., (1958). Political Recruitment and Party Structure: A Case Study, The American Political Science Review, Vol. 55, No. 1, 77-86. https://doi.org/10.2307/1976051.

Seligman, Lester G., (1961). Party Roles and Political Recruitment, Western Political Quarterly, Volume: 11 issue: 2, 359-36. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591295801100215.

Siavelis, Peter M., and Morgenstern, Scott, (2008). Political Recruitment and Candidate Selection in Latin America: A Framework for Analysis in Peter M. Siavelis and Scott Morgenstern. Eds. (2008). Pathways to Power: Political Recruitment and Candidate Selection in Latin America. Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University.

Surbakti, Ramlan and Supriyanto, Didik, (2013). Mendorong Demokratisasi Internal Partai Politik. Jakarta: Kemitraan bagi Pembaruan Tata Pemerintahan.

Shomer, Yael, Put, Gert-Jan, and Gedalya-Lavy, Einat. (2016). Intra-Party Politics and Public Opinion: How Candidate Selection Processes Affect Citizens’ Satisfaction with Democracy, Political Behavior, Vol 38, Issue 3, 509–534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-015-9324-6.

Teorell, Jan, (1999). A Deliberative Defence of Intra-Party Democracy, Party Politics, Vol 5. No.3, 363-382. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068899005003006.

Tashandra, Nabilla, (2018) "Kepuasan Publik Terhadap DPR Paling Buncit", https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2017/11/26/22391171/kepuasan-publik-terhadap-dpr-paling-buncit. Accessed on Friday, 29 June 2018.

Ware, Alan, (1979). The Logic of Party Democracy. London and Basingstoke: The Macmillan Press Ltd.

Wolkenstein, Fabio, (2016). A Deliberative Model of Intra-Party Democracy, Journal of Political Philosophy, 24 (3), 297-320. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopp.12064.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26555/novelty.v12i01.a17036

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Jurnal Hukum Novelty

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Hukum Novelty

ISSN 1412-6834 (Print)

ISSN 2550-0090 (Online)

Creative Commons License
This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Jurnal Hukum Novelty Stats

 

Jurnal Hukum Novelty is indexed by:

 

   

 

Jurnal Hukum Novelty is member of:

 

Translator/Proofreader Partnership: