Shooting Down Military Aircraft: Pakistan Responsibilities Over India

Dewa Gede Sudika Mangku, Jilal Aqli

Abstract


Introduction to The Problem: The act of firing on two Indian military aircraft carried out by Pakistan indeed constitutes the right of air control over military aircraft according to the Paris Convention of 1919 and the Chicago Convention of 1944, according to which this convention's control rights over foreign military aircraft are strict and maximum, it does not contain exceptions Article 32 of the Paris Convention and Article 3 (c) of the 1944 Chicago Convention The right of maximum and strict control of the state over its airspace is only directed to military aircraft of other countries, where the consideration of national security is the main reason. But still, the shooting action carried out by Pakistan against Indian military aircraft is an act of negligence on airspace which became its sovereignty, due to the lack of coordination related to the shootings carried out.

Purpose/Objective Study: This study aims to determine and understand the regulation of Indian military aircraft in the 1944 Chicago Convention on Flight of Military Aircraft to Airspace in Other Countries and the responsibility of the state of Pakistan in firing Indian military aircraft from the perspective of international air law.

Design/Methodology/Approach: This research is research that uses normative legal research methods using a type of legislation approach and case approach. The legal materials used are primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials that are useful for obtaining conclusions that are relevant to the problems in this study.

Findings: The results showed that: 1) the regulation of Indian military aircraft in the 1944 Chicago Convention was categorized as a military aircraft (state aircraft) type of MiG-21 Bison interceptor which was indeed used for military, police and customs purposes, which in this case did not have the right to do flight above the airspace of another country before obtaining permission in advance from the country concerned; 2) the form of responsibility that must be given is in the form of termination of acts, apologies and remedial actions in the form of restitution, ie repairing as before the Indian military aircraft that he shot and providing protection for pilots he captures, this is as regulated in Article 31 of the ILC Draft.

Paper Type: Research Article


Keywords


State Responsibilities; Military Aircraft; Pakistan; India

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adolf, H. (1996). Aspek-aspek dalam hukum internasional. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Arianta, K., Mangku, D. G. S., & Yuliartini, N. P. R. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Kaum Etnis Rohingya Dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia Internasional. Jurnal Komunitas Yusisia, 3(2), 93–111. http://dx.doi.org/10.23887/jatayu.v3i2.28849

Bourbonniere, M., & Haeck, L. (2000). Military aircraft and international law: Chicago opus 3. Journal of Air Law & Commerce, 66(3), 885. Retrieved from https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc/vol66/iss3/2/

Ciptantri, S. B., Mangku, D. G. S., Yuliartini, N. P. R. (2018). Pertanggungjawaban egara Uni Soviet atas penembakan pesawat Korea Air Lines ditinjau dari perspektif hukum udara internasional. Jurnal Komunitas Yustisia, 1(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.23887/jatayu.v1i2.28732

Cooper, J. C. (1951). United States participation in drafting Paris Convention 1919. Journal of Air Law & Commerce, 18(3), 266. https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc/vol18/iss3/2

Guillaume, G. (2004). Terrorism and international law. International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 53(3), 537-548. https://doi.org/10.1093/iclq/53.3.537

Hutapea, R. U. (2019). Pakistan tembak jatuh 2 pesawat tempur India di Kashmir. Retrieved in Januari 1, 2020, from https://news.detik.com/internasional/d-4446513/pakistan-tembak-jatuh-2-pesawat-tempur-india-di-kashmir

Impiani. (2019). Escalation of military conflict between India and Pakistan in the post-Lahore Declaration (1999-2019): Security dilemma perspective. Global: Jurnal Politik Internasional, 21(2). https://doi.org/10.7454/global.v21i2.403

Ishaq. (2017). Metode Penelitian Hukum dan Penulisan Skripsi, Tesis, serta Disertasi. Jakarta: Alfa Beta.

Kaura, V. (2020). India’s Pakistan policy: from 2016 surgical strike to 2019 Balakot ‘airstrike.’ The Round Table: The Commonwealth Journal of International Affairs 109(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/00358533.2020.1760499

Koh, H. H. (1998). Is international law really state law? Harvard Law Review, 111(7) 1824-1861. DOI:10.2307/1342484

Kurz, R. W., & Bartles, C. K. (2007). Chechen suicide bombers. Journal of Slavic Military Studies, 20(4), 529-547. https://doi.org/10.1080/13518040701703070

Leino, T. K., Leppäluoto, J., Ruokonen, A., & Kuronen, P. (1998). Pro-opiomelanocortin activation and simulated interceptor combat flight. Aviation, space, and environmental medicine, 69(5), 486-490. Retrieved from https://europepmc.org/article/med/9591619

Mangku, D. G. S. (2011). Peluang dan tantangan ASEAN dalam penyelesaian sengketa Kuil Preah Vihear di perbatasan Kamboja dan Thailand. Pandecta: Research Law Journal, 6(2), 106–116. https://doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.v6i2.2329

Mangku, D. G. S., & Radiasta, I. K. (2019). Tanggung jawab negara terhadap penembakan pesawat MH17 berdasarkan hukum internasional. Pandecta: Research Law Journal, 14(1), 25–33. https://doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.v14i1.1898

Martono, H. K., & Sudiro. (2016). Hukum udara nasional dan internasional publik. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Pegahi, T. N. (2019). From Kargil to Pulwama: How nuclear crises have changed over 20 years. The Washington Quarterly, 42(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2019.1626690

Ramsey, M. D. (2009). International law limits on investor liability in human rights litigation. Harvard International Law Journal, 50, 271. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3l0BMUr

Rudy, M. T. (2002). Hukum internasional 2. Jakarta: Refika Aditama.

Sefriani. (2016). Hukum internasional suatu pengantar edisi kedua. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.

Shaw QC, M. N. (2013). Hukum internasional (International law). Jakarta: Nusa Media.

Saul, B. (2013). China, natural resources, sovereignty, and international law. Asian Studies Review, 37(2), 196-214. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357823.2013.769497

Thontowi, J. (2006). Hukum internasional kontemporer. Jakarta: PT Refika Aditama.

Tufail, A. C. K. (2019). Pulwama–from bluster to a whimper. Defence Journal, 22(12), 32.

Williams, A. J. (2010). A crisis in aerial sovereignty? Considering the implications of recent military violations of national airspace. Area, 42(1), 51-59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2009.00896.x

Wiradipraja, S. (2014). Pengantar hukum udara dan ruang angkasa. Bandung: Alumni.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26555/novelty.v11i2.a16215

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Jurnal Hukum Novelty

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Hukum Novelty

ISSN 1412-6834 (Print)

ISSN 2550-0090 (Online)

Creative Commons License
This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Jurnal Hukum Novelty Stats

 

Jurnal Hukum Novelty is indexed by:

 

   

 

Jurnal Hukum Novelty is member of:

 

Translator/Proofreader Partnership: