Death Penalty: A Response to Arguments by Indonesian Muslim Opposers

Muchammad Ichsan

Abstract


Introduction to The Problem: Life is the greatest gift human beings receive. Man can achieve any task with life, and without it, man can do nothing. Thus, attempts by the State to punish human beings with the death penalty for wrongdoing are reaping the pros and cons. It is clear the stance of Western human rights activists opposed to the death penalty. What is interesting is that, although Islamic law supports it, many educated Muslims have objected to the death penalty.

Purpose/Objective Study: The purpose of this research is to analyze and respond to the arguments used by Indonesian Muslim human rights activists, especially those integrated into human rights organizations, which are anti-death penalty. It is hoped that these reviews and responses will contain more definite opinions that can provide enlightenment for all.

Design/Methodology/Approach: This research used a descriptive, analytical approach. Therefore, it employed secondary data and normative methods combined to case and statute approach in studying, analyzing, and responding to the arguments of anti-death penalty human rights activists among Indonesian Muslims. Their cases are to be brought forward, investigated, and then returned one by one.

Findings: The research found that the human rights ideology propagated by western human rights activists is influencing Indonesian Muslim activists. They have the same point that the death penalty degrades humanity and violates human rights. In the meantime, Islamic law defends the death penalty for providing justice to the victims and the wider community, and for preserving life.


Keywords


Death Penalty; Human Rights; Islamic Law; Right to Life

Full Text:

PDF

References


Al-Baihaqi, A. B. A. bin al-H. bin A. (1344). Al-Sunan al-kubrā (First). Haedarabad: Majlis Dāirāt al-Ma’ārif al-Niṭāmiyah.

Al-Bukhari, M. bin I. (1987). Al-Jāmi’ al-ṣaḥīḥ (1st ed.). Cairo: Dār Al-Sya’b.

Al-Hajjaj, A. al-H. M. bin. (n.d.). Ṣaḥīḥ muslim. Beirut: Dār al-Jail.

Al-Razi, M. ibn U. ibn al-H. (1400). Al-Maḥṣūl fī ‘ilm al-uṣūl (First). Riyadh: Jāmi’āt al-Imām Muḥammad ibn Sa’ūd al-Islāmiyah.

Amitai, E. (2010). Life: The most basic right. Journal of Human Rights, 9(1), 100-110. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14754830903530359

Amnesty International. (2019). Death penalty. Retrieved December 25, 2019, from https://www.amnesty.org/en/what-we-do/death-penalty/

Anti-Death Penalty Asia Network. (2019). About Us. Retrieved December 27, 2019, from https://adpan.org/aboutus/

Arifin, T. (2019). The guarantee of the application of capital punishment on a peacfull and harmonious life: Proof from around the world. PETITA: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Syariah, 4(1), 56–66. https://doi.org/10.22373/petita.v4i1.14

Arifin, T. (2015). Misunderstanding of the Indonesian human rights activists on the application of the death penalty. Asy-Syari'ah, 17(2), 185-198. https://doi.org/10.15575/as.v18i1.7607

Audah, A. Q. (2011). Al-Tasyrī’ Al-Jinā`ī Al-Islāmī Muqāranan bi Al-Qānūn Al-Waḍ’ī. Beirut: Dār Al-Kutub Al-‘Ilmiyah.

Badan Pekerja Kontras. (2007). Praktek hukuman mati di Indonesia. Jakarta.

Baker, M. (2018). Capital punishment for apostasy in Islam. Arab Law Quarterly, 32(4), 439–461. https://doi.org/10.1163/15730255-12324033

Bibi, S., Hongdao, Q., Ullah, N., Khaskheli, M. B., Saleem, H. A. R. (2019). Excessive use of death penalty as stoppage tool for terrorism: Wrongful death executions in Pakistan. Journal of Law, Policy, and Globalization, 81, 42-52. https://doi.org/10.7176/jlpg/81-05

Burleson, E. (2005). Juvenile execution, terrorist extradition, and supreme court discretion to consider death penalty jurisprudence. Albany Law Review, 68, 909-950. Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/46714471.pdf

Dhillon, G., Mohammad, N., Miin, N. Y. (2012). Capital punishment in Malaysia and globally: A tool for justice or a weapon against humanity. Legal Network Series, 1-24. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2QUN53R

Dubagari, U. A. (2016). Same sex marriage, human rights and death penalty:

Common and Islamic law perspectives. Journal of Philosophy,

Culture and Religion, 23, 49–57. Retrieved from https://iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JPCR/article/view/33164/34062

ECPM. (2016). Report 6th world congress against the death penalty. Retrieved from http://www.ecpm.org/wp-content/uploads/actes-Oslo-GB-220217b.pdf

Fayaz, A. A., Nezhad, A. K. A., Moghaddam, H. N. (2016). A critique of documentations of discretionary death penalty in jurisprudence and Afghanistan Penal Code. The Social Sciences, 11(4), 463-469. Retrieved from http://profdoc.um.ac.ir/articles/a/1058098.pdf

Feldman, J. C. (2015). Nothing less than the dignity of man: The eighth amendment and state efforts to reinstitute traditional methods of execution.

Washington Law Review, 90(3), 1313-1348. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4877&context=wlr

Hnidka, R. (2016). European perspective and legal framework of death penalty. Izzivi Prihodnosti/Challenges of the Future, 1(4), 159–171. Retrieved from https://www.fos-unm.si/media/pdf/ip/death_penalty_hnidka_10.pdf

Imparsial. (2016). Imparsial minta hukuman mati dihentikan. Retrieved December 26, 2019, from http://www.imparsial.org/publikasi/berita/imparsial-minta-hukuman-mati-dihentikan/

Imparsial. (2019a). Evaluasi praktik hukuman mati pada era pemerintahan Jokowi 2014-2019. Retrieved December 27, 2019, from http://www.imparsial.org/publikasi/siaran-pers/evaluasi-praktik-hukuman-mati-pada-era-pemerintahan-jokowi-2014-2019/

Imparsial. (2019b). Profil. Retrieved December 26, 2019, from http://www.imparsial.org/profil/tentang-imparsial/

Johnson, D. T. (2016). Retention and reform in Japanese capital punishment. University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, 49(4), 853-889. Retrieved from https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjlr/vol49/iss4/4/

Kallins, L. B. (1993). The juvenile death penalty: Is the United States in controvertion of international law? Maryland Journal of International Law & Trade, 17(1), 77-108. Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/56359333.pdf

Karim, R., Newaz, S., & Kabir, A. I. (2017). A Comparative analysis of retributive justice and the law of qisas. Journal of Nusantara Studies (JONUS), 2(2), 169. https://doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol2iss2pp169-177

KontraS. (2005). Hukuman Mati adalah Pelanggaran Prinsip Kemanusiaan dan Konstitusi RI! Retrieved December 27, 2019, from http://kontras.org/backup/home/index.php?module=pers&id=41

KontraS. (2019). Profil KontraS. Retrieved December 27, 2019, https://kontras.org/en/company-profile/

LBH Masyarakat. (2015). Negara harus segera melakukan moratorium hukuman mati. Retrieved December 28, 2019, from https://lbhmasyarakat.org/negara-harus-segera-melakukan-moratorium-hukuman-mati/

LBH Masyarakat. (2019a). Hukuman mati bukan solusi: Pernyataan sikap LBH Masyarakat atas eksekusi Amrozi, dkk. Retrieved December 28, 2019, from https://lbhmasyarakat.org/hukuman-mati-bukan-solusi-pernyataan-sikap-lbh-masyarakat-atas-eksekusi-amrozi-dkk/

LBH Masyarakat. (2019b). Tentang kami. Retrieved December 28, 2019, from https://lbhmasyarakat.org/tim-kami/

Lindsey, T., & Steiner, K. (2016). Islam, the monarchy and criminal law in Brunei: The syariah penal code order, 2013. Griffith Law Review, 25(4), 552–580. https://doi.org/10.1080/10383441.2016.1273294

McRae, D. (2017). Indonesian capital punishment in comparative perspective. Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences of Southeast Asia, 173(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134379-17301002

Mohamed, G. (2017). Reforming the death penalty in Egypt: An Islamic law perpetive. Unpublished Master's Thesis. Indiana University Maurer School of Law, Indiana.

Novak, A. (2015). The abolition of the mandatory death penalty in India and Bangladesh: A comparative commonwealth perspective. Global Business & Development Law Journal, 28, 227-254. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2JomSGz

Olugbenga, A. E. (2012). Modern methods of executing condemned prisoners:

Elixir to painful killings? International Journal of Business

and Social Science, 3(8), 141-148. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/aa4d/439c2f0a6bebdd752aabab3bb481e03898db.pdf

Ramzan, S., Akhter, N., & Rubab, A. (2015). Punishment from Islamic perspective. Journal of Social Sciences, 9(1), 53-56. Retrieved from http://www.sbbwu.edu.pk/journal/Journal%20June%202015/8.%20Punishmetn%20from%20Isllamic%20Perspectives.pdf

Rao, D. (2015). An autopsy evaluation of complete decapitation injuries. International Journal of Forencis Science & Pathology, 3(4), 99-104. https://dx.doi.org/10.19070/2332-287X-1500024

Rifai, E. (2017). An analysis of the death penalty in Indonesia criminal law.

Sriwijaya Law Review, 1(2), 190-199. https://doi.org/10.28946/slrev.vol1.iss2.44.pp191-200

Shaheed, A., & Sanei, F. (2016). Outlier: Iran and its use of death penalty. Cardozo Legal Studies Research Paper, 564. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3237140

Simandjuntak, D. (2015). Spectacle of the scaffold ? The politics of death penalty in Indonesia. ISEAS Yusof Ishak Institute, (46), 1–8. Retrieved from https://www.iseas.edu.sg/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/ISEAS_Perspective_2015_46.pdf

Sina, L. (2016). Implementation of the death penalty in the perspective of human rights in Indonesia. Hasanuddin Law Review, 2(3), 385. https://doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v2i3.695

Sulaiman, A. (2018). Reinterpretasi ayat al- qiṣāṣ QS. Al-Baqarah: 178-179 (Pendekatan maqāṣid al-syarī'ah dan sosio-historis). Maghza: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur'an dan Tafsir, 3(2), 242-252. https://doi.org/10.24090/maghza.v3i2.2137

The Lancet. (2016). Ending the death penalty for juveniles. The Lancet, 387(10018), 506. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00266-X

The World Coalition Against the Death Penalty. (2019). Presentation. Retrieved December 26, 2019, from http://www.worldcoalition.org/Presentation.html

United Nations. (2016). Death penalty and Punishment (1st ed.; I. Šimonović, Ed.). New York: Office of High Commissioner.

Xiong, M., Miao, M. (2018). Miscarriage of Justice in Chinese Capital Cases. Hastings International & Comparative Law Review, 41(3), 273-342. Retrieved from https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_international_comparative_law_review/vol41/iss3/3




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26555/novelty.v11i1.a15291

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Jurnal Hukum Novelty

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Hukum Novelty

ISSN 1412-6834 (Print)

ISSN 2550-0090 (Online)

Creative Commons License
This journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Jurnal Hukum Novelty Stats

 

Jurnal Hukum Novelty is indexed by:

 

   

 

Jurnal Hukum Novelty is member of:

 

Translator/Proofreader Partnership: