Directed Reading Thinking Activity (DRTA) Method and Students' Critical Thinking Level in Editing Scientific Articles
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26555/bahastra.v39i2.14699Keywords:
DRTA Method The level of critical thinking The ability to edit scientific articlesAbstract
The aim of this research is to explain the use of the DRTA method and the level of critical thinking in improving students' ability in editing scientific articles. The method used in this research is experimental research. The result shows that using the DRTA method affected the ability to edit scientific articles if it is in accordance to the students’ level of critical thinking (high and low). Learning outcomes of editing scientific articles of students who have high critical thinking scales are different from learning outcomes of editing scientific articles of students who have low level of critical thinking. Students who were treated with the DRTA Method had higher level of critical thinking and had significant differences from those who had low levels of critical thinking. The acquisition of the average score showed the students who studied with the DRTA method and had a high critical thinking level are 90.1, while the score of the students who had a low critical thinking level are 79.3.References
Andriani, D. (2017). "The Influence of Reading Comprehension Achievement at the Eighth Grade Students of SMP Muhammadiyah 1 Rawa Bening By Using DRTA and KWL Strategies". The Journal of English Language Studies, 02(01), 32–45.
Burrough-Boenisch, J. (2012). “Defining and Describing Editing.†In Supporting Research Writing: Roles and Challenges in Multilingual Settings (pp. 141–155). Https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-84334-666-1.50009-6.
Duron, R., Limbach, B., & Waugh, W. (2006). Critical Thinking Framework For Any Discipline. Interrnational Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 17(2), 160–166. Https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr. 2006.09.004.
Ennis, R. H. (2011). "The Nature of Critical Thinking: An Outline of Critical Thinking Dispositions". Inquiry, 26(1), 1–8.
Havid, K. (2015). "Analisis Kesalahan pada Naskah Abstract Jurnal Ilmiah". Http://etd.repository.ugm.ac.id.
Liah, S. S. (2016). Analisis Kesalahan Ejaan dan Kalimat pada Artikel Jurnal Terakreditasi Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan 2014 Universitas Kristen Petra. Universitas Sanata Dharma.
Masitah. (2014). "Pengaruh Sikap Pemikiran Kritis Terhadap Hasil Belajar Mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi FKIP Universitas Mulawarman".Jurnal SSIOêduKASI, 3(September),318–323.
Muttaqiin, A. (2015). "Hubungan antara Kemampuan Membaca Kritis dalam Pembelajaran Penemuan dan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa". Edusentris, 2(2), 116. Https://doi.org/10.17509/edusentris. v2i2.165.
Neil, B. M., & M.Keeley, S. (2007). Asking The Right Questions: A Guide to Critical Thinking. New Jersey: Upper Saddle River.
Prasetyo, B. (2016). “Kemampuan Menyunting Teks Eksposisi Siswa Kelas X IPA SMA Negeri 1 Kendari.†Jurnal Bastra, 1 (1), 1–17. Retrieved from Kemampuan, Menyunting, Eksposisi.
Pujiono, S. (2012). “Berpikir Kritis dalam Literasi Membaca dan Menulis untuk Memperkuat Jati Diri Bangsa.†Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 3(7), 778–783.
Sariyem, S. (2016). "Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dan Minat Baca dengan Kemampuan Membaca Kritis Siswa Kelas Tinggi SD Negeri di Kabupaten Bogor". Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 7(2), 329. Https://doi.org/10.21009/JPD.072.11.
Stauffer, R. G. (1969). Directing the reading-thinking process. USA: Harper & Row.
Suhartono. (2014). "Pengaruh Kebiasaan Membaca, Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis, dan Penguasaan Struktur Sintaksis terhadap Keterampilan Menulis Ilmiahâ€. Lentera Pendidikan, 17(1), 43–65.
Suwartini, I., & Fujiastuti, A. (2017). "Teknik Pembuatan Buku Ajar Membaca Kritis dan Kreatif Berbasis Arcs (Attention, Relevance, Convidence, Satisfaction) untuk Mahasiswa Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia". Bahastra, 37(2), 138. Https://doi.org/10.26555/bahastra.v37i2.7610.
Tierney, R. J., Readence, J.E., &Dishner, E.K. (1995). Reading Strategies and Practices: a Compendium. Edisi keempat. Amerika: Allyn & Bacon.
Walker, Barbara J., (2012). Diagnostic Teaching of Reading. Boston: Pearson Education.
Westwood, P. (2008). What teachers need to know about Reading and writing. (C. Glascodine, Ed.). Autralia: Ligare.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
