University Students’ Willingness to Communicate in Virtual Classroom

Hanifah Hanifah, Elsa Ernawati Nainggolan

Abstract


Shifting from real classes to online classes ideally does not decrease students’ willingness to communicate (WTC) in a language classroom since it is an indication of successful language learning in a virtual class. Given the crucial of promoting students’ willingness to communicate in English online class, the present study analyzed the patterns of university students’ WTC in a synchronous virtual class. With this purpose in mind, 43 students taking English for general purposes were chosen as the sample in this study. To gather the data of students’ WTC patterns, the online class using zoom application was observed by administrating the Coding scheme developed by Chao and Philp. The patterns of the students’ WTC were analyzed and classified into six categorizes based on the scheme. The results of the study reveal that the occurrences and patterns of students’ WTC are affected by different task types given by the lecturer. Thus, it is expected that education practitioners construct virtual learning design providing various activities so that students’ WTC in an online classroom can be triggered and enhanced.


Keywords


University students; willingness to communicate; virtual class

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abrar, M., Mukminin, A., Habibi, A., Asyrafi, F., & Marzulina, L. (2018). " If our English isn't a language, what is it?" Indonesian EFL Student Teachers' Challenges Speaking English. The Qualitative Report, 23(1), 129-145.

Adams, R. (2018). Enhancing student interaction in the language classroom: Part of the Cambridge Papers in ELT series. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cao, Y. (2011). Investigating situational willingness to communicate within second language classrooms from an ecological perspective. System, 39(4), 468-479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2011.10.016

Cao, Y., & Philp, J. (2006). Interactional context and willingness to communicate: A comparison of behavior in whole class, group and dyadic interaction. System, 34(4), 480-493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2006.05.002

Fadilah, Eka. (2018). Willingness to Communicate from Indonesian Learners’ Perspective. Journal of ELT Research: The Academic Journal of Studies in English Language Teaching and Learning, 3(2), 168-185. https://doi.org/10.22236/JER_Vol3Issue2pp168-185

Frey, L., Botan, C. H., & Kreps, G. (2000). Investigating communication. NY: Allyn & Bacon.

Havwini, T. (2019). Indonesian EFL students’willingness to communicate in the 2013 curriculum implementation: A case study. TEFLIN Journal, 30(1), 105-120. https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v30i1/105-1

Kang, S.-J. (2005). Dynamic emergence of situational willingness to communicate in a second language. System, 33(2), 277-292 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2004.10.00420

Khatib, M., & Nourzadeh, S. (2015). Development and validation of an instructional willingness to communicate questionnaire. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 36(3), 266-283. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2014.914523

Khatibi, M. B., & Zakeri, J. (2014). Iranian EFL learners’ willingness to communicate across different context-and receiver-types. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9(8), 932-939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.502

Lee, W., & Ng, S. (2010). Reducing student reticence through teacher interaction strategy. ELT Journal, 64(3), 302-313 https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccp080

McCroskey, J. C. & Baer, J. E. (1985, November). Willingness to communicate: The construct and its measurement. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Speech CommuniCation Association, Denver, Colorado.2-11

MacIntyre, P. D., Dörnyei, Z., Clément, R., & Noels, K. A. (1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. The Modern Language Journal, 82(4), 545-562. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb05543.x

Maryansyah, Y. (2019). A study on English students’ willingness to communicate in English in social media. Premise: Journal of English Education, 8(1), 31-45. https://doi.org/10.24127/pj.v8i1.1930

Pattapong, K. (2015). Complex Interactions of Factors Underlying Thai EFL Learners' Willingness to Communicate in English. PASAA: Journal of Language Teaching and Learning in Thailand, 49, 105-136.

Pawlak, M., Mystkowska-Wiertelak, A., & Bielak, J. (2016). Investigating the nature of classroom willingness to communicate (WTC): A micro-perspective. Language Teaching Research, 20(5), 654-671. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168815609615

Peng, J. E.,& Woodrow, L. (2010). Willingness to communicate in English: A model in the Chinese EFL classroom context. Language Learning, 60(4), 834-876. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00576.x

Rahayu, Dwi. .(2020). Students’ E-Learning Experience Through a Synchronous Zoom Web Conference System. Journal of ELT Research, 5(1), 69-79. https://doi.org/10.22236/JER_Vol5Issue1pp68-79

Ummah, Khairatul, Rusdi Thaib , Saunir Saun.(2016). Types of questions asked by English teachers in teaching and learning process at SMA Pembangunan UNP Padang. Journal of English Language Teaching, 5(1), 325-330. https://doi.org/10.24036/jelt.v5i1.7331

Wanjryb, Ruth.(1992).Classroom Observation Tasks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Zacharias, N. T. (2014). Second language teacher contributions to student classroom participation: A narrative study of Indonesian learners. ELTWorldOnline. com, 6, 1793-8732.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26555/adjes.v8i1.20108

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Hanifah Hanifah Hanifah

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

ADJES (Ahmad Dahlan Journal of English Studies)

ISSN: 2356-5012, e-ISSN: 2477-2879

Published by Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

View ADJES Stats