Factors influencing student engagement in online ideological and political education: a qualitative study of vocational college students in China
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26555/jpsd.v12i1.a30759Keywords:
Student engagement, Ideological and political courses, Online Learning, Higher Vocational CollegesAbstract
The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the global shift to online education, exposing both opportunities and challenges in ideological and political (I&P) courses at Chinese higher vocational colleges, where student engagement remains pivotal yet underexplored. This qualitative study examines how students perceive and experience engagement in online I&P courses, framed by Activity Theory, Social Interaction, and Critical Pedagogy. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 30 students (15 males, 15 females; freshman to junior cohorts) from Anhui Vocational and Technical College, using Tencent Meetings for 30-minute sessions. Thematic analysis identified two core themes: (1) Infrastructure—students emphasized the necessity of clear rules, stable platforms (e.g., MOOCs, ClassIn), and teacher responsiveness to foster accountability; (2) Engagement Dynamics—peer collaboration, real-world case studies, and critical discussions enhanced motivation, while poor internet connectivity, abstract content, and self-regulation struggles impeded participation. Notably, students highlighted the transformative potential of interactive tools (e.g., real-time Q&A, role-playing simulations) in bridging theory and practice. Limitations include the single-institution sample, potential response bias, and lack of longitudinal data. Nevertheless, findings offer actionable insights: educators should design modular content aligned with vocational contexts, integrate adaptive technologies to mitigate connectivity issues, and implement structured peer-review systems to sustain motivation. Institutional support for digital literacy training and hybrid learning models is also critical. Future research should expand to diverse regions, incorporate mixed methods, and track long-term outcomes to strengthen pedagogical strategies in online I&P education.
References
[1] X. Zhang et al., “A Case Study of Applying Open Educational Practices in Higher Education during COVID-19: Impacts on Learning Motivation and Perceptions,” Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 21, p. 9129, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.3390/su12219129.
[2] R. Vettriselvan, P. R. Velmurugan, A. Deepan, G. Jaiswani, and M. Durgarani, “Transforming Virtual Education: Advanced Strategies for Quality Assurance in Online and Distance Learning,” in Navigating Quality Assurance and Accreditation in Global Higher Education, 2024, pp. 563–580.
[3] J. M. S. Wong, W. K. W. Tang, and K. C. Li, “Digital transformation in higher education: tertiary students’ perspectives on online learning and its implications for the future,” Int. J. Innov. Learn., vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 1–18, 2025, doi: 10.1504/IJIL.2025.144600.
[4] Olateju Temitope Akintayo, Chima Abimbola Eden, Oyebola Olusola Ayeni, and Nneamaka Chisom Onyebuchi, “Evaluating the impact of educational technology on learning outcomes in the higher education sector: a systematic review,” Int. J. Manag. Entrep. Res., vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 1395–1422, May 2024, doi: 10.51594/ijmer.v6i5.1091.
[5] Olateju Temitope Akintayo, Chima Abimbola Eden, Oyebola Olusola Ayeni, and Nneamaka Chisom Onyebuchi, “Evaluating the impact of educational technology on learning outcomes in the higher education sector: A systematic review,” Open Access Res. J. Multidiscip. Stud., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 052–072, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.53022/oarjms.2024.7.2.0026.
[6] N. M. H. A. Al-Qashouti, “Educational System Management Under Crisis Events: Remote Education Framework During and Post the Pandemic.” Hamad Bin Khalifa University (Qatar), 2024.
[7] M. Sadeghi, “A Shift from Classroom to Distance Learning: Advantages and Limitations,” Int. J. Res. English Educ., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 80–88, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.29252/ijree.4.1.80.
[8] M. Hassan, “Online Teaching Challenges during COVID-19 Pandemic,” Int. J. Inf. Educ. Technol., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 41–46, 2021, doi: 10.18178/ijiet.2021.11.1.1487.
[9] V. Trowler, “Student engagement literature review,” High. Educ. Acad., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2010.
[10] M.-T. Wang and J. S. Eccles, “School context, achievement motivation, and academic engagement: A longitudinal study of school engagement using a multidimensional perspective,” Learn. Instr., vol. 28, pp. 12–23, Dec. 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.04.002.
[11] E. M. Anderman, D. L. Gray, and Y. Chang, “Motivation and Classroom Learning,” in Handbook of Psychology, Second Edition, Wiley, 2012.
[12] B. Means, Y. Toyama, R. Murphy, M. Bakia, and K. Jones, “Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies.” Centre for Learning Technology, pp. 1–93, 2009.
[13] P. Bawa, “Retention in Online Courses,” Sage Open, vol. 6, no. 1, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.1177/2158244015621777.
[14] F. Martin and D. U. Bolliger, “Engagement Matters: Student Perceptions on the Importance of Engagement Strategies in the Online Learning Environment,” Online Learn., vol. 22, no. 1, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092.
[15] X. Liu, “Student engagement in higher music education with online learning components: A mixed methods case study.” The University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 2021.
[16] W. Elshami, M. H. Taha, M. E. Abdalla, M. Abuzaid, C. Saravanan, and S. Al Kawas, “Factors that affect student engagement in online learning in health professions education,” Nurse Educ. Today, vol. 110, p. 105261, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105261.
[17] O. A. Lasekan, V. Pachava, M. T. Godoy Pena, S. K. Golla, and M. S. Raje, “Investigating Factors Influencing Students’ Engagement in Sustainable Online Education,” Sustainability, vol. 16, no. 2, p. 689, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.3390/su16020689.
[18] P. Kedia and L. Mishra, “Exploring the factors influencing the effectiveness of online learning: A study on college students,” Soc. Sci. Humanit. Open, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 100559, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100559.
[19] G. Mucundanyi, College student engagement in online learning. new mexico state university, 2019.
[20] R. Afroze and S. Shafi, “The Impact of Technological and Social Factors on Students’ Engagement in Online Learning: Evidence Based on Self-Determination Theory,” Int. J. Bus. Technopreneursh., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–22, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.58915/ijbt.v13i1.962.
[21] Z. Zhang, “The Impact of Digital Teaching Resources on Student Learning Engagement,” Int. J. Educ. Teach. Res., vol. 1, no. 2, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.70767/ijetr.v1i2.300.
[22] Ü. Çakıroğlu, M. Kokoç, E. Kol, and E. Turan, “Exploring teaching programming online through web conferencing system: The lens of activity theory,” J. Educ. Technol. Soc., vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 126–139, 2016.
[23] F. Altınay, “Examining the role of social interaction in online learning process,” Ensayos Rev. la Fac. Educ. Albacete, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 97–106, 2017.
[24] D. M. Dwikamayuda, “Empowering education: Integrating critical pedagogy into transformative teaching strategies,” in Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 2024, vol. 1, pp. 53–66.
[25] D. P. Adhikari and G. P. Pandey, “Critical Pedagogy in Higher Education: EFL Teachers’ Perceptions and Classroom Applications,” AMC J., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 18–33, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.3126/amcj.v5i1.75959.
[26] A. Rahimi and M. A. Sajed, “The Interplay between Critical Pedagogy and Critical Thinking: Theoretical Ties and Practicalities,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 136, pp. 41–45, Jul. 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.284.
[27] M. L. Nieto-Taborda and R. Luppicini, “Accelerated Digital Transformation of Higher Education in the Wake of COVID-19: A Systematic Literature Review,” International Journal of Changes in Education. 09-Sep-2024, doi: 10.47852/bonviewIJCE42023125.
[28] W. Han, “Using Information Technology to Improve Ideological and Political Education and Student Management Efficiency in Colleges,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1533, no. 2, p. 022126, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1533/2/022126.
[29] J. W. Creswell and C. N. Poth, Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications, 2016.
[30] M. N. K. Saunders and F. Bezzina, “Reflections on conceptions of research methodology among management academics,” Eur. Manag. J., vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 297–304, Oct. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2015.06.002.
[31] R. B. Kline, Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford publications, 2023.
[32] J. W. Creswell, Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Michigan: SAGE Publications, Inc, 2017.
[33] F. G. Castro, J. G. Kellison, S. J. Boyd, and A. Kopak, “A Methodology for Conducting Integrative Mixed Methods Research and Data Analyses,” J. Mix. Methods Res., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 342–360, Oct. 2010, doi: 10.1177/1558689810382916.
[34] A. Ugwu, Exploring the perceived effects of online and hybrid learning on the experiences of students in Nigerian universities. Pepperdine University, 2024.
[35] J. A. Leaston, “Digital Learning Dynamics: A Quantitative Analysis of On-Line Education Among Adult Learners in an Urban Community College Environment.” Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary, 2024.
[36] V. Braun and V. Clarke, “Using thematic analysis in psychology,” Qual. Res. Psychol., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 77–101, Jan. 2006, doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
[37] S. E. Baker and R. Edwards, “How many qualitative interviews is enough.” NCRM, pp. 1–43, 2012.
[38] A. P. Association, Publication manual of the American psychological association. American Psychological Association, 2010.
[39] J. Biggs, C. Tang, and G. Kennedy, Teaching for quality learning at university 5e. McGraw-hill education (UK), 2022.
[40] R. E. Mayer, The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning. Cambridge University Press, 2014.
[41] A. Bandura, “Social foundations of thought and action,” in Englewood Cliffs, NJ, vol. 1986, 1986, pp. 23–28.
[42] Y. Jing, C. Wang, Z. Chen, S. Shen, and R. Shadiev, “A bibliometric analysis of studies on technology‐supported learning environments: Hot topics and frontier evolution,” J. Comput. Assist. Learn., vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 1185–1200, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.1111/jcal.12934.
[43] M. Prensky, “Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1,” Horiz., vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 1–6, Sep. 2001, doi: 10.1108/10748120110424816.
[44] S. Bennett, K. Maton, and L. Kervin, “The ‘digital natives’ debate: A critical review of the evidence,” Br. J. Educ. Technol., vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 775–786, Sep. 2008, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00793.x.
[45] R. M. Bernard et al., “How Does Distance Education Compare With Classroom Instruction? A Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Literature,” Rev. Educ. Res., vol. 74, no. 3, pp. 379–439, Sep. 2004, doi: 10.3102/00346543074003379.
[46] A. Ardiyansyah, E. Setiawan, and B. Budiya, “Moving Home Learning Program (MHLP) as an Adaptive Learning Strategy in Emergency Remote Teaching during the Covid-19 Pandemic,” JPUD - J. Pendidik. Usia Dini, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1–21, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.21009/JPUD.151.01.
[47] P. Freire, “Pedagogy of the oppressed, translated by Myra Bergman Ramos,” New York: Continuum, vol. 1993. 1970.
[48] S. D. Brookfield, Teaching for critical thinking: Tools and techniques to help students question their assumptions. John Wiley & Sons, 2011.
[49] W. Wagner, R. Göllner, A. Helmke, U. Trautwein, and O. Lüdtke, “Construct validity of student perceptions of instructional quality is high, but not perfect: Dimensionality and generalizability of domain-independent assessments,” Learn. Instr., vol. 28, pp. 1–11, Dec. 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.03.003.
[50] A. Bandura, C. Barbaranelli, G. V. Caprara, and C. Pastorelli, “Self‐Efficacy Beliefs as Shapers of Children’s Aspirations and Career Trajectories,” Child Dev., vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 187–206, Jan. 2001, doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00273.
[51] A. L. Duckworth and M. E. P. Seligman, “Self-Discipline Outdoes IQ in Predicting Academic Performance of Adolescents,” Psychol. Sci., vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 939–944, Dec. 2005, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01641.x.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Sun Chunxiu, Abdulrazak Yahya Saleh
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in JURNAL JPSD (Jurnal Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar) agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the JURNAL JPSD (Jurnal Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the work for any purpose, even commercially with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in JURNAL JPSD (Jurnal Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar).
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in JURNAL JPSD (Jurnal Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar).
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
