The influence of the TaRL approach on the critical thinking ability of elementary school students in mathematics subject
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26555/jpsd.v12i1.a29248Keywords:
TaRL Approach, Critical Thinking Skills, Mathematics, Elementary School StudentsAbstract
The results of the PISA study revealed that students have low critical thinking skills in Indonesia, especially in mathematics. This study aims to evaluate the effect of the Teaching at the Right Level (TaRL) strategy on the critical thinking skills of fourth-grade elementary school students in solving arithmetic problems in Yogyakarta. This study used a quantitative approach with a nonequivalent control group experimental design. The instruments used included essay tests, observation sheets, and documentation. Data were analyzed through descriptive statistics and t-tests to test the hypothesis. The results of the analysis showed that the TaRL strategy significantly improved students' critical thinking skills in four main aspects. The t-test produced a significance value of 0.000 (<0.05), indicating a significant difference between the experimental and control groups. The average posttest score of the experimental group reached 81.5, which is higher than that of the control group, which obtained an average of 76. This increase is illustrated in students' abilities to identify problems, analyze information, evaluate solutions, and logically convey arguments. These findings indicate that the TaRL strategy is effective in improving learning outcomes and contributes to strengthening students' critical thinking skills from an early age. Thus, the implementation of TaRL can be an alternative adaptive and transformative learning strategy to improve the quality of basic education in Indonesia.
References
[1] F. Fauzan, R. A. M. Ansori, M. Dannur, A. Pratama, and A. Hairit, “The Implementation of the Merdeka Curriculum (Independent Curriculum) in Strengthening Students’ Character in Indonesia,” Aqlamuna J. Educ. Stud., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 136–155, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.58223/aqlamuna.v1i1.237.
[2] M. G. Moore, “Toward a Theory of Independent Learning and Teaching,” J. Higher Educ., vol. 44, no. 9, pp. 661–679, Dec. 1973, doi: 10.1080/00221546.1973.11776906.
[3] C. Hockings, L. Thomas, J. Ottaway, and R. Jones, “Independent learning – what we do when you’re not there,” Teach. High. Educ., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 145–161, Feb. 2018, doi: 10.1080/13562517.2017.1332031.
[4] W. Wawan and H. Retnawati, “Empirical Study of Factors Affecting the Students’ Mathematics Learning Achievement,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 417–434, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.29333/iji.2022.15223a.
[5] R. Lazarides, J. Buchholz, and C. Rubach, “Teacher enthusiasm and self-efficacy, student-perceived mastery goal orientation, and student motivation in mathematics classrooms,” Teach. Teach. Educ., vol. 69, pp. 1–10, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2017.08.017.
[6] A. Yohannes and H.-L. Chen, “The effect of flipped realistic mathematics education on students’ achievement, mathematics self-efficacy and critical thinking tendency,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 29, no. 13, pp. 16177–16203, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10639-024-12502-8.
[7] B. Arisoy and B. Aybek, “The Effects of Subject-Based Critical Thinking Education in Mathematics on Students’ Critical Thinking Skills and Virtues,” Eurasian J. Educ. Res., vol. 21, no. 92, pp. 99–119, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.14689/ejer.2021.92.6.
[8] A. N. Rohmah, S. Sutama, Y. M. Hidayati, E. Fauziati, and L. E. Rahmawati, “Planning for Cultivation Numerical Literacy in Mathematics Learning for Minimum Competency Assessment (AKM) in Elementary Schools,” Mimb. Sekol. Dasar, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 503–516, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.53400/mimbar-sd.v9i3.51774.
[9] A. D. Daroin and D. Aprilya, “Education Paradigm for Happiness Ki Hajar Dewantara’s Philosophical Analysis,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Language, Education, and Social Science (ICLESS 2022), Paris: Atlantis Press SARL, 2023, pp. 95–104. doi: 10.2991/978-2-494069-15-2_11
[10] A. Jose, J. P. A. de Mendonça, E. Devijver, N. Jakse, V. Monbet, and R. Poloni, “Regression tree-based active learning,” Data Min. Knowl. Discov., vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 420–460, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10618-023-00951-7.
[11] S. Wang, J. Bao, Y. Liu, and D. Zhang, “The impact of online learning engagement on college students’ academic performance: The serial mediating effect of inquiry learning and reflective learning,” Innov. Educ. Teach. Int., vol. 61, no. 6, pp. 1416–1430, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.1080/14703297.2023.2236085.
[12] S. M. Glynn and L. K. Winter, “Contextual Teaching and Learning of science in elementary schools,” J. Elem. Sci. Educ., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 51–63, Sep. 2004, doi: 10.1007/BF03173645.
[13] L. Nurmasari, Budiyono, J. Nurkamto, and M. Ramli, “Realistic Mathematics Engineering for improving elementary school students’ mathematical literacy,” J. Math. Educ., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1–26, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.22342/jme.v15i1.pp1-26.
[14] Y. Hanggara, A. Qohar, and Sukoriyanto, “The Impact of Augmented Reality-Based Mathematics Learning Games on Students’ Critical Thinking Skills,” Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol., vol. 18, no. 07, pp. 173–187, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.3991/ijim.v18i07.48067.
[15] Y. Hattori, Y. Inoue, K. Matsubara, R. Hakamata, and Y. Hisadomi, “Enhancing critical thinking in mathematics education: A rubric for students’ social values,” Int. Electron. J. Math. Educ., vol. 20, no. 3, p. em0830, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.29333/iejme/16186.
[16] Z. Er, “Examination of the relationship between mathematical and critical thinking skills and academic achievement,” Pedagog. Res., vol. 9, no. 1, p. em0176, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.29333/pr/14028.
[17] S. Gökçe and P. Güner, “Pathways from cognitive flexibility to academic achievement: mediating roles of critical thinking disposition and mathematics anxiety,” Curr. Psychol., vol. 43, no. 20, pp. 18192–18206, May 2024, doi: 10.1007/s12144-024-05642-0.
[18] R. A. Afandi, N. S. Ningtyas, E. Susiyawati, and P. Pratiwi, “The Effectiveness of Differentiated Learning using the TaRL (Teaching at the Right Level) Approach for Improving Learning Interest and Learning Outcome,” J. Pijar Mipa, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 657–662, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.29303/jpm.v19i4.6860.
[19] L. Pritchett and A. Beatty, “Slow down, you’re going too fast: Matching curricula to student skill levels,” Int. J. Educ. Dev., vol. 40, pp. 276–288, Jan. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2014.11.013.
[20] A. J. Franco-Mariscal, M. J. Cano-Iglesias, E. España-Ramos, and Á. Blanco-López, “The ENCIC-CT Model for the Development of Critical Thinking,” in Critical thinking in science education and teacher training, 2024, pp. 3–42. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-78578-8_1
[21] L. E. W. Fajari, “Critical thinking skills and their impacts on elementary school students,” Malaysian J. Learn. Instr., vol. 18, no. 2, p. 161, 2021, doi: 10.32890/mjli2021.18.2.6.
[22] K. D. Reynolds and S. G. West, “A Multiplist Strategy for Strengthening Nonequivalent Control Group Designs,” Eval. Rev., vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 691–714, Dec. 1987, doi: 10.1177/0193841X8701100601.
[23] R. Arini, Y. S. Rahayu, and E. Erman, “Profile of Critical Thinking Results Analyzed from Facione Indicators and Gender of Learners,” IJORER Int. J. Recent Educ. Res., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 434–446, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.46245/ijorer.v4i4.328.
[24] S. Mustafa, N. Ilmi, and S. Suliati, “Innovative Strategies in Math Education: The Impact of PBL and TaRL on Concept Mastery and Classroom Dynamics,” J. VARIDIKA, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 50–63, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.23917/varidika.v36i1.5150.
[25] M. A. Pratama, “Improving Student Learning Outcomes Through the TaRL Learning Model on Discussion,” Ideguru J. Karya Ilm. Guru, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 53–59, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.51169/ideguru.v9i1.644.
[26] P. Susongko, R. Bhandari, M. Kusuma, Y. Arfiani, and D. Pratama, “Community Critical Thinking Skills Framework: A Literature Review Study,” J. Innov. Educ. Cult. Res., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 35–42, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.46843/jiecr.v5i1.978.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Farida Kusumaningrum, Meita Fitrianawati, Muhammad Taqiyuddin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in JURNAL JPSD (Jurnal Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar) agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the JURNAL JPSD (Jurnal Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the work for any purpose, even commercially with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in JURNAL JPSD (Jurnal Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar).
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in JURNAL JPSD (Jurnal Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar).
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
