Hybridization in the labor children's school curriculum: A multiperspective study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26555/jpsd.v11i1.a28640Keywords:
Curriculum hybridization, Childcare, Working parents, Play theoryAbstract
If education is not managed effectively, it will remain incomplete and produce suboptimal results. Additionally, the predominant workforce in Indonesian society often leads to less-than-optimal supervision of children, resulting in workplace anxiety and discomfort due to inadequate childcare. The discrepancy between school hours and parents' working hours often leads to neglect of children's studies. Consequently, the author is deeply motivated to elucidate the research objectives, which focus on identifying the model or format of curriculum hybridization suitable for children of workers and determining the necessary preparations for implementing such a hybrid curriculum at SD Muhammadiyah Warungboto Yogyakarta. This research aims to provide insights into appropriate curriculum hybridization and the requisite preparations for its implementation. The research methodology employed is qualitative descriptive, drawing upon several references related to curriculum hybridization. The findings underscore the crucial necessity of curriculum hybridization, particularly in fostering parental comfort with the educational system by integrating play theory and children's games into the school curriculum. SD Muhammadiyah Warungboto serves as a pivotal institution for developing and strengthening a curriculum tailored to the needs of children from working families. Preparatory measures encompass infrastructure enhancements, provision of playgrounds and gaming facilities, accommodation facilities, counseling services, teacher training initiatives, and the recruitment of instructors specializing in talent and the arts. In conclusion, the research highlights the significance of curriculum hybridization for children of working parents, given the prevalent 8-hour workday norm. The integration of the national curriculum with elements of play and games is paramount. Such integration demands comprehensive preparations, not only concerning infrastructure and teacher readiness but also in tailoring the curriculum to suit the unique needs and conditions of the children.References
R. M. Reiter and R. H. Downing, "Intercultural communication in a globalized world," in The Routledge Handbook of Spanish Pragmatics, New York: Routledge, 2020. Series: Routledge Spanish language handbooks: Routledge, 2020, pp. 305-320. doi: 10.4324/9780429455643-22.
A. Gupta, “Early Experiences and Personal Funds of Knowledge and Beliefs of Immigrant and Minority Teacher Candidates Dialog with Theories of Child Development in a Teacher Education Classroom,” J. Early Child. Teach. Educ., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 3–18, Jan. 2006, doi: 10.1080/10901020500534224.
V. Adriany, “‘I don’t want to play with the Barbie boy’: Understanding Gender-Based Bullying in a Kindergarten in Indonesia,” Int. J. Bullying Prev., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 246–254, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.1007/s42380-019-00046-2.
A. Gupta, Diverse Early Childhood Education Policies and Practices. Routledge, 2014. doi: 10.4324/9780203797846
H. Erdem and T. Akyol, “Children s participation from the perspective of teachers,” J. Pedagog. Res., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 188–202, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.33902/JPR.2021167549.
R. Niemi, “From active joining to child-led participation: A new approach to examine participation in teaching practice,” South African J. Child. Educ., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–7, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.4102/sajce.v9i1.663.
T. M. Collins, L. D. Sinclair, and V. E. Zufelt, “Children’s Rights to Participation and Protection: Examining Child and Youth Care College Curricula in Ontario,” Child Youth Serv., vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 268–297, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.1080/0145935X.2020.1790352.
W. Yang and H. Li, “Curriculum Hybridization and Cultural Glocalization: A Scoping Review of International Research on Early Childhood Curriculum in China and Singapore,” ECNU Rev. Educ., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 299–327, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.1177/20965311221092036.
D. A. Wagner, “The Effects of Formal Schooling on Cognitive Style,” J. Soc. Psychol., vol. 106, no. 2, pp. 145–151, Dec. 1978, doi: 10.1080/00224545.1978.9924164.
A. Guggenheim, “Hope in the Wobbles: Negotiations into, Out of, and between Critical Dispositions,” Equity Excell. Educ., vol. 52, no. 2–3, pp. 298–311, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.1080/10665684.2019.1647807.
J. Ahn, “Finding a Child’s Self: Globalization and the Hybridized Landscape of Korean Early Childhood Education,” Anthropol. Educ. Q., vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 224–243, Sep. 2015, doi: 10.1111/aeq.12104.
V. Adriany, “Negotiating local and glocal discourse in kindergarten: Stories from Indonesia,” J. Pedagog., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 77–93, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.2478/jped-2019-0004.
N. Vitale and C. Coccia, "Impact of a Montessor Based Nutrition Program on Children's Knowledge and Eating Behaviors," J. Sch. Health, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 53-61, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1111/josh.13237.
M. Crossley and G. Vulliamy, "Case Study Research Methods and Comparative Education," Comp. Educ., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 193-207, Jan. 1984, doi: 10.1080/0305006840200202.
M. Picchio, I. Di Giandomenico, and T. Musatti, “The use of documentation in a participatory system of evaluation,” Early Years, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 133–145, Apr. 2014, doi: 10.1080/09575146.2014.897308.
J. Winwood, “Using interviews,” in Practical Research Methods in Education, Routledge, 2019, pp. 12–22. doi: 10.4324/9781351188395-2
G. Owen, “Qualitative Methods in Higher Education Policy Analysis: Using Interviews and Document Analysis,” in The Qualitative Report, 2014, pp. 1–19. doi: 10.46743/2160-3715/2014.1211
M. Klemencic and I. Chirikov, "How Do We Know How Students Experience Higher Education? On the Use of Student Surveys," in The European Higher Education Area, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2015, pp. 361-379. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-20877-0_24
C. Maroy, "Convergences and hybridization of educational policies around 'post bureaucratic' models of regulation," Comp. A J. Comp. Int. Educ., vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 71–84, Jan. 2009, doi: 10.1080/03057920801903472.
S. J. LeSourd, “Curriculum Development and Cultural Context,” Educ. Forum, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 205–216, Jun. 1990, doi: 10.1080/00131729009335536.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in JURNAL JPSD (Jurnal Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar) agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the JURNAL JPSD (Jurnal Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the work for any purpose, even commercially with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in JURNAL JPSD (Jurnal Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar).
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in JURNAL JPSD (Jurnal Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar).
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
