The development of digital literacy smart e-book (CERI) as a resource for learning digital literacy skills in elementary schools

Authors

  • Anggun Kusuma Budi Maharani Elementary Teacher Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
  • Fitri Puji Rahmawati Elementary Teacher Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26555/jpsd.v10i2.a27982

Keywords:

Research and Development, Digital Literacy, ADDIE Model, Elementary School Education, E-book Validation

Abstract

This Research and Development (R&D) study focuses on creating Smart Digital Literacy E-books to serve as a valuable learning resource for enhancing digital literacy skills among elementary school students. Employing the ADDIE model, encompassing the Analysis, Design, and Development stages, the research seeks to address the critical need for effective digital literacy education in elementary schools. The subjects of this investigation comprised grade VI students at SDN 02 Palur. To gather comprehensive data, a combination of interviews, observations, and questionnaires was employed. Interviews with resource persons provided insights into students' current digital literacy skills, while observations were conducted to understand their digital literacy activities at school. Additionally, a questionnaire, administered by a validation expert, assessed the effectiveness of the CERI E-book. The validation tests yielded encouraging results, with language validation scoring 87.5%, subject validation at 83.33%, and media validation at an impressive 95.83%. Feedback from the feasibility test, conducted among students, affirmed the CERI E-book's suitability for educational use. Students highlighted its interactivity, ease of understanding, and comprehensive content, reinforcing its efficacy as a learning resource. In conclusion, the outcomes of this research and development endeavor underscore the high suitability of the CERI E-book for fostering digital literacy skills in elementary school students. The interactive features and comprehensive content make it a valuable contribution to the field of digital literacy education

References

C. Elamin, N. Fordham, D. R. Hammond, B. O’bannon, R. Vannetta, and K. Gruber, “Infusing technology into the elementary classroom: A school/university partnership model,” Comput. Sch., vol. 19, no. 1–2, pp. 149–162, Aug. 2002, doi: 10.1300/J025v19n01_11.

D. Mhlanga, “Digital Transformation in Education: Relevant Paradigms and Theories of Teaching and Learning in the Industry 4.0,” in Intelligent Systems in Digital Transformation: Theory and Applications, 2023, pp. 453–470. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-16598-6_19

N. C. Burbules, G. Fan, and P. Repp, “Five trends of education and technology in a sustainable future,” Geogr. Sustain., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 93–97, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.geosus.2020.05.001.

A. Haleem, M. Javaid, M. A. Qadri, and R. Suman, “Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review,” Sustain. Oper. Comput., vol. 3, pp. 275–285, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004.

A. Szymkowiak, B. Melovic, M. Dabic, K. Jeganathan, and G. S. Kundi, “Information technology and Gen Z: The role of teachers, the internet, and technology in the education of young people,” Technol. Soc., vol. 65, p. 101565, May 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101565.

A. Oke and F. A. P. Fernandes, “Innovations in Teaching and Learning: Exploring the Perceptions of the Education Sector on the 4th Industrial Revolution (4IR),” J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex., vol. 6, no. 2, p. 31, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.3390/joitmc6020031.

L. I. Gonzalez Perez and M. S. Ramirez Montoya, “Components of Education 4.0 in 21st Century Skills Frameworks: Systematic Review,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 3, p. 1493, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14031493.

A. Alam, "Social Robots in Education for Long Term Human Robot Interaction: Socially Supportive Behaviour of Robotic Tutor for Creating Robo Tangible Learning Environment in a Guided Discovery Learning Interaction," ECS Trans., vol. 107, no. 1, pp. 12389 - 12403, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.1149/10701.12389ecst.

M. Spiteri and S. N. Chang Rundgren, “Literature Review on the Factors Affecting Primary Teachers’ Use of Digital Technology,” Technol. Knowl. Learn., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 115–128, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10758-018-9376-x.

R. Eynon, “Becoming digitally literate: Reinstating an educational lens to digital skills policies for adults,” Br. Educ. Res. J., vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 146–162, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1002/berj.3686.

A. Kumi-Yeboah, A. Sallar, L. K. Kiramba, and Y. Kim, “Exploring the Use of Digital Technologies from the Perspective of Diverse Learners in Online Learning Environments,” Online Learn., vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 42–63, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.24059/olj.v24i4.2323.

W. M. Al-Rahmi, N. Yahaya, M. M. Alamri, I. Y. Alyoussef, A. M. Al-Rahmi, and Y. Bin Kamin, “Integrating innovation diffusion theory with technology acceptance model: supporting students’ attitude towards using a massive open online courses (MOOCs) systems,” Interact. Learn. Environ., vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 1380–1392, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.1080/10494820.2019.1629599.

I. Blau, T. Shamir-Inbal, and O. Avdiel, “How does the pedagogical design of a technology-enhanced collaborative academic course promote digital literacies, self-regulation, and perceived learning of students?,” Internet High. Educ., vol. 45, p. 100722, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.100722.

M. L. Bernacki, J. A. Greene, and H. Crompton, “Mobile technology, learning, and achievement: Advances in understanding and measuring the role of mobile technology in education,” Contemp. Educ. Psychol., vol. 60, p. 101827, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101827.

H. Yildiz Durak, “Modeling of relations between K-12 teachers’ TPACK levels and their technology integration self-efficacy, technology literacy levels, attitudes toward technology and usage objectives of social networks,” Interact. Learn. Environ., vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 1136–1162, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.1080/10494820.2019.1619591.

D. Alt and N. Raichel, “Enhancing perceived digital literacy skills and creative self-concept through gamified learning environments: Insights from a longitudinal study,” Int. J. Educ. Res., vol. 101, p. 101561, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101561.

F. A. Dwiputri, F. N. A. Kurniawati, and N. Febriyanti, “Pengelolaan Sarana dan Prasarana di Sekolah Dasar dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas Pembelajaran Daring di Masa Pandemi,” Aulad J. Early Child., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 198–205, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.31004/aulad.v4i3.178.

D. Sulistiyarini and F. Sabirin, “21st Century Literacy Skill of Information Technology and Computer Education Students,” JPI (Jurnal Pendidik. Indones., vol. 9, no. 4, p. 576, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v9i4.24432.

A. Urbinati, D. Chiaroni, V. Chiesa, and F. Frattini, “The role of digital technologies in open innovation processes: an exploratory multiple case study analysis,” R&D Manag., vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 136–160, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1111/radm.12313.

N. Masyhura and Z. H. Ramadan, “Implementation of Digital Literacy in Elementary Schools,” Int. J. Elem. Educ., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 639–647, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.23887/ijee.v5i4.39480.

Herianto, I. Wilujeng, and D. P. Lestari, “Effect of interactive multimedia e-books on lower-secondary school students’ curiosity in a Science course,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 9619–9639, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10639-022-11005-8.

S. Fazilla, A. Yus, and M. Muthmainnah, “Digital Literacy and TPACK’s Impact on Preservice Elementary Teachers’ Ability to Develop Science Learning Tools,” Profesi Pendidik. Dasar, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 71–80, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.23917/ppd.v9i1.17493.

A. Asik, “Digital Storytelling: An Alternative Method and a Multimodal Task to Improve Writing Skill of English Language Learners,” in New Directions in Technology for Writing Instruction, 2022, pp. 69–80. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-13540-8_4.

A. Bergstrom and L. Hoglund, “E-books: In the shadow of print,” Converg. Int. J. Res. into New Media Technol., vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 895–911, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.1177/1354856518808936.

R. Kumbhar, “Trends in E-book Research,” DESIDOC J. Libr. Inf. Technol., vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 162–169, May 2018, doi: 10.14429/djlit.38.3.12382.

A. Yanagisawa, S. Webb, and T. Uchihara, “How do different forms of glossing contribute to L2 vocabulary learning from reading?: A meta-regression analysis,” Stud. Second Lang. Acquis., vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 411–438, May 2020, doi: 10.1017/S0272263119000688.

Downloads

Published

2023-11-18

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 2 (2023): November

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish in JURNAL JPSD (Jurnal Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar) agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the JURNAL JPSD (Jurnal Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar) right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) the work for any purpose, even commercially with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in JURNAL JPSD (Jurnal Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar).
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in JURNAL JPSD (Jurnal Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar).
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

    Lisensi Creative Commons

    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License