The analysis of students’ mistakes in solving word problems on fractions based on polya problem-solving: a study case of 4th grade elementary school students

Authors

  • Pupung Pungkasan Universitas Ahmad Dahlan Yogyakarta
  • Meita Fitrianawati Universitas Ahmad Dahlan Yogyakarta
  • Sugiyarto Sugiyarto Department of Mathematics, University of Ahmad Dahlan Yogyakarta
  • Muhammad Taqiyuddin Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, University of Auckland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26555/jpsd.v9i2.a25153

Keywords:

Student mistakes, mathematics word problems, Polya’s problem-solving

Abstract

The needs to understand mistakes made by students in solving fraction problems in mathematics and the prevalent views that mathematics is a difficult and unfavored subject serve as the main background for this research. The purpose of this research is to describe the students’ mistakes when solving mathematics problems analyzed through Polya’s problem-solving framework. This study follows a quantitative research tradition with a descriptive method. The participants of this study are the 4th-grade students and all of the 4th-grade teachers in two schools: Padaringan State Elementary School 1 and: Padaringan State Elementary School 2. The sample applied in this research consists of 56 students selected through the purposive sampling method. The data were collected using written tests and interviews. Next, the collected data were analyzed using a quantitative approach in the form of percentages for each mistake category. The result of this research shows that the mistake percentage in the step of understanding the problem is 23.37%. This form of mistake is considered the lowest mistake category compared to the other form of mistakes. The mistake percentage in the step of plan designing is 26.53%, while the mistake percentage in the step of plan initiating is 24.36%. In addition to that, the mistake percentage in the step of answer reviewing is 25.74%

Author Biography

Meita Fitrianawati, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan Yogyakarta

Scopus ID: 57211578915

References

Apriasari, M., & Rejeki, S. (2020). Profil Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa Kelas VIII Pada Penyelesaian Soal Cerita Materi Sistem Persamaan Linear Dua Variabel. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Dan Inovasi Pembelajaran Matematika (JRPIPM), 4(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.26740/jrpipm.v4n1.p23-36

Arifin, Z. (2017). Mengembangkan instrumen pengukur critical thinking skills siswa pada pembelajaran matematika abad 21. Jurnal THEOREMS (The Original Research of Mathematics), 1(2), 92–100.

Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur penelitian suatu pendekatan praktik. Rineka cipta.

Asdarina, O., Johar, R., & Hajidin, H. (2019). Upaya Guru Mengembangkan Karakter Berpikir Kritis dan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa Melalui Pembelajaran Matematika. Jurnal Peluang, 7(1), 31–43.

Cipta, R. (2014). Abdurrahman, Mulyono. 2003. Pendidikan bagi anak berkesulitan belajar. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta Andartari, Susanti, Santi., & Andriani, Vidia. 2013. Pengaruh kemampuan intelektual (IQ) dan motivasi belajar terhadap hasil belajar siswa pada mata pelajaran aku. Journal Mimbar PGSD Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, 2(1).

Hudojo, H. (2003). Common Textbook (Edisi Revisi) Pengembangan Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran Matematika. UM Press.

Ifenthaler, D. (2012). Determining the effectiveness of prompts for self-regulated learning in problem-solving scenarios. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 15(1), 38–52.

Intisari, I. (2017). Persepsi Siswa Terhadap Mata Pelajaran Matematika. Wahana Karya Ilmiah Pendidikan, 1(01).

Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(4), 63–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02300500

Katon, K. S., & Arigiyati, T. A. (2018). Analisis kesalahan siswa menurut polya materi persamaan dan pertidaksamaan linear satu variabel.

Khumairah, W. (2020). Analisis kesalahan dalam menyelesaikan soal cerita matematika tipe hots berdasarkan gender: Studi kasus pada siswa kelas V SDI Surya Buana Kota Malang. Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim.

Rofi’ah, N., Ansori, H., & Mawaddah, S. (2019). Analisis kesalahan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal cerita matematika berdasarkan langkah penyelesaian polya. EDU-MAT: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(2), 120. https://doi.org/10.20527/edumat.v7i2.7379

Runtukahu, T., & Kandou, S. (2014). Pembelajaran matematika dasar bagi anak berkesulitan belajar. Ar-ruzz media.

Saputri, R. A. (2019). Analisis kesalahan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal cerita bangun datar di SMP Islam Hasanuddin Malang. THETA: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 1(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.35747/tetha.v1i1.234

Siagian, M. D. (2016). Kemampuan koneksi matematik dalam pembelajaran matematika. MES: Journal of Mathematics Education and Science, 2(1).

Siregar, N. R. (2017). Persepsi siswa pada pelajaran matematika: studi pendahuluan pada siswa yang menyenangi game. Prosiding Temu Ilmiah Nasional X Ikatan Psikologi Perkembangan Indonesia, 1.

Suci, A., Martha, D., & Basuki, F. H. (2014). Perancangan Game Edukatif (Perhitungan Matematika Sederhana). Jurnal Komputer Bisnis, 456, 29–34.

Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D (1st ed.). Alfabeta.

Susanti, R. D., & Taufik, M. (2019). Analysis Student Mistake of Teacher Professional Education In Completing Story Problems Based on Newman Procedures. International Journal of Trends in Mathematics Education Research, 2(2), 72–75. https://doi.org/10.33122/ijtmer.v2i2.59

Tonra, W. S. (2017). Pembelajaran number sense untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa sekolah dasar pada materi pecahan. Delta-Pi: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.33387/dpi.v5i2.233

Triningtyas, D. A. (2016). Studi kasus tentang rasa percaya diri, faktor penyebabnya dan upaya memperbaiki dengan menggunakan konseling individual. Counsellia: Jurnal Bimbingan Dan Konseling, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.25273/counsellia.v3i1.239

Tsai, Y.-R., & Lee, C.-Y. (2018). An exploration into factors associated with reading anxiety among taiwanese efl learners. TEFLIN Journal - A Publication on the Teaching and Learning of English, 29(1), 129. https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v29i1/129-148

Downloads

Published

2022-11-12

Issue

Section

Articles