PENGARUH PENDEKATAN CTL TERHADAP PRESTASI BELAJAR KOGNITIF MAHASISWA

Authors

  • Puput Wahyu Hidayat STKIP Muhammadiyah Muara Bungo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26555/jpsd.v6i1.a12865

Keywords:

CTL, Learning Achievement, Cognition

Abstract

The purpose study was to depcription the effect contextual teaching and learning (CTL) approach toward student learning achievement at PGSD STKIP Muhammadiyah Muara Bungo. The Research concept used quantitative research, with pretest-posttest non-equivalent group design. This Research population include all members od third semester student which has 4 classes. Meanwhile, two choosen classes made for an example of Research it was Class C and D. The results of this study indicate that the CTL approach can improve the student learning achievement is better than conventional approach.

References

Arikunto, S. (2013). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Hidayat, P. W., & Bungo, M. (2018). Pengaruh pendekatan ctl dengan soal open ended terhadap kemampuan berpikir kreatif, 3(1).

Hidayat, P. W., & Widjajanti, D. B. (2018). Analisis kemampuan berpikir kreatif dan minat belajar siswa dalam mengerjakan soal open ended dengan pendekatan CTL An analysis of creative thinking ability and learning interest of students of junior high school in solving open ended problem with CTL approach, 13(1), 63-75.

Hosnan. (2014). Pendekatan Saintifik dan Kontekstual dalam Pembelajaran Abad 21. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.

Indrawan, R. (2014). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif, Kuantitatif dan Campuran. Surabaya: Refika Aditama.

Putri, R. O., Eka, P., & Abadi, A. M. (2014). Keefektifan Pembelajaran Matematika dengan Pendekatan CTL dan Problem Posing Ditinjau dari Ketercapaian SK / KD dan Kemampuan Koneksi Matematik The Effectiveness of Mathematics Teaching Using the CTL and Problem Posing Approaches Viewed from the Achieveme, 9, 79-89.

Saputro, H. B. (2018). Pengembangan modul matematika dengan pendekatan kontekstual pada materi bangun ruang sisi lengkung untuk mahasiswa pgsd uad, 5(1).

Setiana, D. S., & Jailani. (2013). Komparasi Metode CTL dan Open-Ended dengan Gaya Belajar Ditinjau dari Prestasi dan Minat Belajar A Comparison of CTL Method and Open-Ended in Terms of the Learning Styles Viewed from the Students Learning Achievement and Interest, 8, 135-145.

Siagian, R. E., & Flora. (2012). Pengaruh minat dan kebiasaan belajar siswa. Jurnal Formatif, 2(20), 122-131.

Sudjana, N. (2012). Penelitian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Remaja Rosda Karya.

Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitataif dan Kombinasi (Mixed Methods). Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suprijono, A. (2009). Cooperative Learning Teori & Aplikasi PAIKEM. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Wijayanti, T. (2013). Keefektifan Pendekatan CTL dan Problem Solving Ditinjau dari Prestasi Belajar Matematika dan Religiusitas Siswa The Effectiveness of CTL and Problem Solving Approach in Terms of Students Mathematics Achievement and Religiosity, 8, 213-223.

Winkel, W. S. (2009). Psikologi Pengajaran. Jakarta: Gramedia.

Downloads

Published

2019-02-25

Issue

Section

Articles