Fault Detection in Continuous Stirred Tank Reactor (CSTR) System Using Extended Luenberger Observer

Authors

  • Dian Mursyitah Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau
  • Putut Son Maria Electrical Engineering, UIN Sultan Syarif Kasim, Riau, Indonesia
  • Sovi Pebriani Electrical Engineering, UIN Sultan Syarif Kasim, Riau, Indonesia
  • David Delouche Automation, JUNIA HEI, Chateauroux, France
  • Tingting Zhang Electronic Engineering, Xi'an Shiyou University, Xi'an, China
  • Frédéric Kratz Automation, INSA Centre Val de Loire, Bourges, France

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26555/jiteki.v10i4.29797

Keywords:

Fault diagnois, CSTR, Extended Luenberger Observer, Robustness, Sensitivity

Abstract

This research proposes fault detection in a Continuous Stirred Tank Reactor (CSTR) system using an Extended Luenberger Observer (ELO). The ELO is chosen due to the non-linearity of the CSTR system. Accurate state estimation is critical for effective fault diagnosis; therefore, the performance of the ELO is initially tested using two indicators: robustness and sensitivity in estimating the level and concentration within the CSTR system. The sensitivity test yields promising results, with the ELO accurately estimating the actual system despite variations in input and initial conditions, and with a fast convergence time of 1 seconds. The robustness test also demonstrates positive outcomes, as the ELO continues to estimate the system accurately even in the presence of noise with standard deviation 2.5% of measurements. Furthermore, faults that can be related to sensor malfunctions or the disturbances in the CSTR process were successfully detected using the ELO. Performance analysis and fault detection in the CSTR system are presented through simulation. The contributions of this research include development of ELO for non-linear dynamics CSTR system and evidence of its effectiveness in detecting fault within the in CSTR system.

References

[1] A. Simorgh, A. Razminia, and V. I. Shiryaev, "System identification and control design of a nonlinear continuously stirred tank reactor," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, vol. 173, pp. 16-31, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2020.01.010.

[2] P. T R et al., "Impact of sludge density and viscosity on continuous stirred tank reactor performance in wastewater treatment by numerical modelling," Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, p. 105368, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2024.105368.

[3] A. Diedrich and O. Niggemann, "On Residual-based Diagnosis of Physical Systems," Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 109, p. 104636, 2022/03/01/ 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2021.104636.

[4] H. R. Chavoshi, A. K. Sedgh, M. A. Shoorehdeli, and H. Khaloozadeh, "Practical Implementation of Multiple Faults in a Coupled-Tank System: Verified by Model-Based Fault Detection Methods," in 2023 11th RSI International Conference on Robotics and Mechatronics (ICRoM), pp. 488-493, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRoM60803.2023.10412498.

[5] S. Venkateswaran, Q. Liu, B. A. Wilhite, and C. Kravaris, "Design of linear residual generators for fault detection and isolation in nonlinear systems," International Journal of Control, vol. 95, no. 3, pp. 804-820, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1080/00207179.2020.1823020.

[6] A. Mouzakitis, Classification of Fault Diagnosis Methods for Control Systems (Measurement and Control, no. 10). SAGE Publications Ltd, 2013, pp. 303-308. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020294013510471.

[7] R. Arunthavanathan, F. Khan, S. Ahmed, and S. Imtiaz, "An analysis of process fault diagnosis methods from safety perspectives," Computers & Chemical Engineering, vol. 145, p. 107197, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2020.107197.

[8] V. Venkatasubramanian, R. Rengaswamy, K. K. Yin, and S. N. Kavuri, "A review of process fault detection and diagnosis: Part I: Quantitative model-based methods," Comput. Chem. Eng., vol. 27, pp. 293-311, 2003, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-1354(02)00160-6.

[9] D. Li, Y. Wang, J. Wang, C. Wang, and Y. Duan, "Recent advances in sensor fault diagnosis: A review," Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, vol. 309, p. 111990, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2020.111990.

[10] M. M. Syed, T. A. Lemma, S. K. Vandrangi, and T. N. Ofei, "Recent developments in model-based fault detection and diagnostics of gas pipelines under transient conditions," Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, vol. 83, p. 103550, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2020.103550.

[11] G. Graton, J. Fantini, and F. Kratz, "Finite Memory Observers for linear time-varying systems. Part II: Observer and residual sensitivity," Journal of the Franklin Institute, vol. 351, no. 5, pp. 2860-2889, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2013.12.022.

[12] X. Meng, H. Yu, J. Zhang, T. Xu, H. Wu, and K. Yan, "Disturbance Observer-Based Feedback Linearization Control for a Quadruple-Tank Liquid Level System," ISA Transactions, vol. 122, pp. 146-162, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2021.04.021.

[13] S. M. Mousavi and M. Guay, "A Peaking Free Time-Varying High-Gain Observer With Reduced Sensitivity to Measurement Noise," IEEE Control Systems Letters, vol. 7, pp. 2857-2862, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1109/LCSYS.2023.3290045.

[14] R. Mahony, P. Van Goor, and T. Hamel, "Observer design for nonlinear systems with equivariance," Annual Review of Control, Robotics, and Autonomous Systems, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 221-252, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-control-061520-010324.

[15] S. Liu, S. Chen, T. Chen, and Z. Ren, "Residual neural network-based observer design for continuous stirred tank reactor systems," Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, vol. 128, p. 107592, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2023.107592.

[16] P. S. Madhukar and L. Prasad, "State estimation using extended kalman filter and unscented kalman filter," in 2020 International Conference on Emerging Trends in Communication, Control and Computing (ICONC3), pp. 1-4, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICONC345789.2020.9117536.

[17] M. Khodarahmi and V. Maihami, "A review on Kalman filter models," Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 727-747, 2023, https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11831-022-09815-7.

[18] L. Torres, J. Jiménez-Cabas, O. González, L. Molina, and F.-R. López-Estrada, "Kalman Filters for Leak Diagnosis in Pipelines: Brief History and Future Research," Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, vol. 8, no. 3, p. 173, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse8030173.

[19] S. Rúa, R. E. Vásquez, N. Crasta, and C. A. Zuluaga, "Observability analysis and observer design for a nonlinear three-tank system: Theory and experiments," Sensors, vol. 20, no. 23, p. 6738, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-control-061520-010324.

[20] A. Nasr, I. Khoja, T. Ladhari, and S. H. Said, "Synthesis of Observers for the Three Tank System," in 2023 IEEE International Conference on Artificial Intelligence & Green Energy (ICAIGE), pp. 1-6, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAIGE58321.2023.10346279.

[21] M. K. Wafi and B. L. Widjiantoro, "Distributed estimation with decentralized control for quadruple-tank process," International Journal of Scientific Research in Science and Technology vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 301-307, 2023, https://doi.org/10.3329/bjsir.v57i3.62017.

[22] X. Han, Z. Li, M. Cabassud, and B. Dahhou, "A comparison study of nonlinear state observer design: Application to an intensified heat-exchanger/reactor," in 2020 28th Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation (MED), pp. 162-167, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1109/MED48518.2020.9183148.

[23] V. Shenoy and S. K. Vekata, "Estimation of Liquid Level in a Harsh Environment Using Chaotic Observer," Journal of Robotics and Control (JRC), vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 566-582, 2022, http://dx.doi.org/10.18196/jrc.v3i5.16183.

[24] J. D. Avilés, I. Torres-Zúñiga, A. Villa-Leyva, A. Vargas, and G. Buitrón, "Experimental validation of an interval observer-based sensor fault detection strategy applied to a biohydrogen production dark fermenter," Journal of Process Control, vol. 114, pp. 131-142, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprocont.2022.04.012.

[25] D. Stavrov, G. Nadzinski, S. Deskovski, and M. Stankovski, "Quadratic model-based dynamically updated pid control of cstr system with varying parameters," Algorithms, vol. 14, no. 2, p. 31, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/a14020031.

[26] D. Mursyitah, A. Faizal, and E. Ismaredah, "Level Control in Coupled Tank System Using PID- Fuzzy Tuner Controller," Controls and Informatics Seminar, pp. 293-298, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1109/EECCIS.2018.8692846.

[27] H. G. Ibrahim, "Mathematical modeling and simulation of control strategies for continuous stirrer tank reactor," Bangladesh Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 149-162, 2022, https://doi.org/10.3329/bjsir.v57i3.62017.

[28] J. K. Pradhan and A. Ghosh, "Design and implementation of decoupled periodic control scheme for a laboratory-based quadruple-tank process," Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part I: Journal of Systems and Control Engineering, vol. 236, no. 1, pp. 212-224, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1177/09596518211022897.

[29] P. K. Choudhary, D. K. Das, and G. Gurumurthy, "Receding Horizon Controller for Decoupled Two-Input Two-Output Coupled Tank System," in 2022 4th International Conference on Energy, Power and Environment (ICEPE), pp. 1-5, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEPE55035.2022.9797979.

[30] M. Panneerselvam, S. C. Narayany, M. F. Mariam, K. H. Priya, and K. Narmatha, "Decentralized PID control for nonlinear multivariable systems using decoupler," International Journal of Nonlinear Analysis and Applications, vol. 12, no. Special Issue, pp. 1529-1539, 2021, https://doi.org/10.22075/ijnaa.2021.5805.

[31] J. Gauthier, H. Hammouri, and S. Othman, "A simple observer for nonlinear systems applications to bioreactors," IEEE Transactions on automatic control, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 875-880, 1992, https://doi.org/10.1109/9.256352.

[32] G. Besançon, D. Georges, O. Begovich, C. Verde, and C. Aldana, "Direct observer design for leak detection and estimation in pipelines," in 2007 European Control Conference (ECC), pp. 5666-5670, 2007, https://doi.org/10.23919/ECC.2007.7068535.

[33] S. Marzougui, S. Bedoui, A. Atitallah, and K. Abderrahim, "Parameter and state estimation of nonlinear fractional-order model using Luenberger observer," Circuits, Systems, and Signal Processing, vol. 41, no. 10, pp. 5366-5391, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00034-022-02031-5.

[34] A. Adil, A. Hamaz, I. N’Doye, A. Zemouche, T.-M. Laleg-Kirati, and F. Bedouhene, "On high-gain observer design for nonlinear systems with delayed output measurements," Automatica, vol. 141, p. 110281, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2022.110281.

[35] X. Jia, S. Xu, and S. Zhou, "Adaptive Output Feedback Control of Nonlinear Systems: A Dynamic-Gain Scaling Approach," IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 68, no. 8, pp. 5150-5157, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.2022.3221905.

[36] M. Asghari, A. M. Fathollahi-Fard, S. M. J. Mirzapour Al-e-hashem, and M. A. Dulebenets, "Transformation and Linearization Techniques in Optimization: A State-of-the-Art Survey," Mathematics, vol. 10, no. 2, p. 283, 2022, https://doi.org/10.3390/math10020283.

[37] L. Yousfi, S. Aoun, and M. Sedraoui, "Speed sensorless vector control of doubly fed induction machine using fuzzy logic control equipped with Luenberger observer," International Journal of Dynamics and Control, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 1876-1888, 2022, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40435-022-00946-0.

[38] B. Mu, X. Yang, and J. K. Scott, "Comparison of advanced set-based fault detection methods with classical data-driven and observer-based methods for uncertain nonlinear processes," Computers & Chemical Engineering, vol. 166, p. 107975, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2022.107975.

[39] T. Zhang, "Finite memory observer design for continuous-time nonlinear systems with discrete-time measurements: application to diagnosis," PhD Thesis, INSA Centre Val de Loire, 2021, https://hal.science/tel-03195258/.

[40] D. C. Montgomery, Introduction to statistical quality control. John Wiley & Sons, 2020, https://books.google.co.id/books?hl=id&lr=&id=YWLNEAAAQBAJ.

Downloads

Published

2024-11-30

How to Cite

[1]
D. Mursyitah, P. Son Maria, S. Pebriani, D. Delouche, T. Zhang, and F. Kratz, “Fault Detection in Continuous Stirred Tank Reactor (CSTR) System Using Extended Luenberger Observer ”, J. Ilm. Tek. Elektro Komput. Dan Inform, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 681–690, Nov. 2024.

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 4 (2024): December

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Dian Mursyitah, Putut Son Maria

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with JITEKI agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Lisensi Creative Commons

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License