Uji Reliabilitas dan Validitas Eksternal The Raven's Standard Progressive Matrices
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26555/humanitas.v14i1.5772Keywords:
culture fair intelligence test, raven standard progressive matrices, reliabilitas, validitas eksternalAbstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memberikan informasi terkini mengenai reliabilitas dan validitas The Raven Standard Progressive Matrices (SPM) dalam konteks Indonesia. Dalam penelitian ini kami menggunakan data (N=583) yang telah tersedia, dengan rentang usia antara 13-61 tahun. Kami menggunakan metode Cronbach's Alpha untuk menguji reliabilitas SPM dan metode validitas kriteria dengan the Culture Fair Intelligence Test (CFIT) sebagai alat ukur pembanding untuk menguji validitas eksternal dari SPM. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa SPM memiliki reliabilitas yang memuaskan, sebesar .84 (M = 47.20, SD = 6.06). Kemudian juga terbukti valid dengan validitas kriteria yang moderat (r(136) = .64, r2= .41, p < .01). Untuk penelitian selanjutnya, bisa dilakukan investigasi kegunaan diagnostik dari SPM dengan kelompok khusus, seperti kelompok individu cerdas istimewa dan kelompok individu dengan disabilitas inteligensi.
References
Balboni, G., Naglieri, J. A., & Cubelli, R. (2010). Concurrent and Predictive Validity of the Raven Progressive Matrices and the Naglieri Nonverbal Ability Test. Journal of psychoeducational assessment, 28(3), 222-235.
Colom, R., & Abad, F. (2007). Culture Fair Intelligence Test. In N. J. Salkind (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Measurement and Statistics: Sage Publications, Inc.
Flynn, J. R. (1999). Searching for justice: the discovery of IQ gains over time. American psychologist, 54(1), 5.
Heron, A., & Chown, S. (1967). Age and function. London: Churchill.
Jensen, A. (1980). Bias in mental testing. London: Methuen.
Kyle, J.G. (1977). Raven's Progressive Matrices: Thirty years later. British Psychological Society Bulletin, 30, 406-407.
Lembaga Pengembangan Sarana Pengukuran dan Pendidikan Psikologi Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Indonesia. (2009). Buku Petunjuk Penggunaan: CFIT Culture Fair Intelligence Test Skala 3 Bentuk A dan Bentuk B. Depok: LSP3 FPUI.
Moran, A. (1986). The reliability and validity of Raven's Standard Progressive Matrices for Irish apprentices. Applied psychology, 35(4), 533-538.
Nenty, H. J., & Dinero, T. E. (1981). A cross-cultural analysis of the fairness of the Cattell Culture Fair Intelligence Test using the Rasch model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 5(3), 355-368.
Pind, J., Gunnarsdóttir, E. K., & Jóhannesson, H. S. (2003). Raven's Standard Progressive Matrices: new school age norms and a study of the test's validity. Personality and Individual Differences, 34(3), 375-386.
Pintea, S., & Moldovan, R. (2009). The Receiver-Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis: Fundamentals and applications in clinical psychology. Journal of Cognitive and Behavioral Psychoterapies, 9(1), 49-66.
Raven, J. (1983). The Progressive Matrices and Mill Hill Vocabulary Scale in Western Societies. In S. H. Irvine & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Human Assessment and Cultural Factors. (pp. 107 - 114). New York: Plenum Press.
Raven, J. (1988). Manual for Raven's progressive matrices and vocabulary scales. Section 3: The Standard Progressive Matrices. Oxford: Oxford Psychologist Press.
Raven, J. (2000). The Raven's progressive matrices: change and stability over culture and time. Cogn Psychol, 41(1), 1-48. doi:10.1006/cogp.1999.0735
Raven, J., Raven, J. C., & Court, J. H. (1998). Manual for Raven's progressive matrices and vocabulary scales. Oxford: Oxford Psychologists Press.
Rindermann, H., & Nijenhuis, J. (2012). Intelligence in Bali - A case study on estimating mean IQ for a population using a various corrections based on theory and empirical findings. Intelligence, 40, 395 - 400.
Rushton, J. P., Skuy, M., & Bons, T. (2004). Construct Validity of Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices for African and Non-African Engineering Students in South Africa. International journal of selection and assessment, 12(3), 220-229.
Sukarti (1980).The Coloured Progressive Matrices pada anak anak Sekolah Dasar di desa. Yogyakarta: Departemen Psikometri Fakultas Psikologi UGM.
Zou, K. H., O'Malley, J., & Mauri, L. (2007). Receiver-operating characteristic analysis for evaluating diagnostic tests and predictive models. Circulation, 115, 654-657.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic License.
