Identifikasi Diri dan Pembentukan Identitas Diri Karyawan dalam Proses Restrukturisasi Organisasi

Authors

  • mustadin taggala UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA, Indonesia
  • Fathul Himam Fak Psikologi UGM, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26555/humanitas.v15i1.5368

Keywords:

employee's self identity development, organizational change, organizational restructuring.

Abstract

Organization restructuring is a common phenomenon which is applied in order to improve organizational performance. Unfortunately, many restructuring processes often neglect their impacts on employees.This phenomenological research was directed to cover some issues related to the impact of organization restructuring on employees’ behavior, particularly on the way employees’ self identification were developed and how these experiences shape employes’ self identity. In-depth interviews were employed to collect the data that involved 10 employees from UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta and UIN Sultan Alauddin Makassar as respondents. Phenomenology approach is used in this research, and the process of analyzing and interpreting data used Stevick-Colaizzi-Keen technique. Member checks and external audits were used to verify the trustworthiness of the data. This research concluded four major themes related to how employees’ self identity was developed and how employees put its meaning. The themes were (1) be a Learner; (2) surrender to his or her destiny; (3) being active and flexible; (4) be independent. These identities had unique implication toward employees’work behaviors in organization.

References

Chen, S., Chen, Y. K., & Shaw, L. (2004). Self-verification motives at collective level of self-definition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 77-94.

Cummings, T.G. & Worley, C.G. (2005). Organizational development (8th ed.). South- Western Edition: Thompson.

Daft, R. L. (2004). Organization Theory and Design (8th ed.). South-Western: Publishers.

Fuller, J. B., Marler L., Hester, K., Frey, L & Relyea, C. (2006). Construed External Image and Organizational Identification: A test of Moderating Influence of Need for Self-Esteem. Journal of Social Psychology, 146, 701-706.

Himam, F. (2002) Inventing The Future: A Meta-etnographic Analysisi Towards Understanding The Process of Individual and Organizational Adaptive Strategies to Change, Unpublish Doctoral Dissertation, University of Nebraska- Lincoln, Nebraska, USA.

Himam, F. (2005). Absorbing the Wave of Change: A Grounded Case Study in Explaining Change Behavior in Organization. Jurnal Psikologi. 32, 1. 13 – 23.

Kreitner, R & Kinicki, A. (2003). Organizational Behavior. New York: McGrow-Hill Companies. Inc.

Luthans, F. (2002). The need for meaning of Positive Organizational Behaviour.

Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 23, 695-706.

Maiping C. (1996). Identity in Asian Literature. Padstow, Cornwall, Curzon Press.

Mason R. (2004). Organizational Change Models. Futurics, 28, 59-82.

Mishra, A. K. & Spreitzer, G. M. (1998). Explaining How Survivors Respond to Downsizing: The Role of Trust, Empowerment, Justice, and Work Redesign. Academy of Management Review, 23 (3), 567-589.

Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological Research Methods. California: SAGE Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks.

Smither, R.D., Houston, J.M, McIntire, S.A. (1996). Organization Development: Strategies for changing environments. New York: Harper Collins College Publishers.

Spencer, L. M., & Spencer, S. M. (1993). Competence at Work; Models for Superior Performance. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Wood, W., Pool, G. J., Leck, K., & Daniel, P. (1996). Self-definition, Defensive Processing, and Influence: The Normative Impact of Majority and Minority Groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1181-1193.

Downloads

Published

2018-02-15

Issue

Section

Articles