Perbedaan intensitas prososial siswa SMUN dan MAN di Yogyakarta

Authors

  • Alfi Purnamasari Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
  • Endang Ekowarni Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Gadjah Mada
  • Avin Fadhila Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Gadjah Mada

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26555/humanitas.v1i1.20450

Keywords:

Prosocial intention, student from general senior highschool, student from religious senior high school.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to find out the differences of prosocial intention between students of Sekolah Menengah Umum Negeri (SMUN) and students of Madrasah Aliyah Negeri (MAN) in Yogyakarta, between male students and female students in general, and between female studets and male students in each school. The total subjects of the research were 214 students of Sekolah Menengah Umum Negeri 6 (SMUN 6) and Madrasah Aliyah Negeri I (MAN I) Yogyakarta. The students of SMUN 6 consisted of 42 Female sudents and 61 male students, while the students of MAN I consisted of 49 female students and 62 male students. Prosocial Intention Scale was used as data collecting method. 

The results show that there is no difference of prosocial behavior between the students of SMUN and the students of MAN (F=1.116, p>0.05, SMUN average 98.86, MAN average 97.73), there is no differences of prosocial behavior between female students and male students in general (F=1.077;p>0.05; the female students average 98.79, the male students average 97.76), there is no differences of prosocial behavior between male students of SMUN and MAN (t=0.380;p>0.05; the male students of SMUN average 97.35, the male students of MAN average 98.05), there is no differences of prosocial behavior between female students of SMUN and MAN (=-1.870: p>0.05; the female students of SMUN average 100.05 and the female students of MAN 97.51).

References

Anshari, E.S. 1990. Ilmu, Filsafat dan Agama, Pendahuluan Pendidikan Agama Islam di Perguruan Tinggi Umum. Surabaya : Bina Ilmu.

Batson, C.D & Brown, T. 1989. Religion Personal Motivation: Is it Altrustic or Egoistic? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol 57. No. 5. Hal 873-884.

Berndt, T.J. 1992. Child Development. New York: Brace Jovenovich College Publisher.

Eisenberg, N & Mussen, P. H. 1989. The Roots of Prosocial Behavior in Children. Cambridge University Press.

Fishbein, M. 1976. Attitude Theory and Measurement. New York : John Willey and Sons, Inc.

Hurlock, E. B. 1972. Adolescent Development. Tokyo: McGraw Hill, Kogakusha Ltd.

Illardo, Y. A. 1981. Speaking Persuasively. New York : Mac Millan Publishing Co, Inc.

Matsumoto, D. 1996. Culture and Psychology. California : Brooks Cole Publishing Company, Pacific Grove.

Monks, F J, Knoers, A.M.P dan Haditono, S.R. 1989. Psikologi Perkembangan: Pengantar dalam Berbagai Bagiannya. Yogyakarta: Univesitas Gadjah Mada Press.

Samuel, W.1981. Personality. New York : John Willey and Sons, Inc.

Staub, E. 1978. Positive Social Behavior and Moralty. Vol I. New York : Academic Press.

Tietjen, A. M. 1986. Prosocial Reasoning Among Children and Adults in Papua New Guinea. Journal of Social Psycbology. Vol 22. No. 6. Hal 861 868.

William, S. 1981. Searching for the sources of Human Behavior. New York: McGraw Hill, Inc.

Downloads

Published

2011-01-31

Issue

Section

Articles