Pengaruh kesamaan komunikator dan target dalam kualitas persuasi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26555/humanitas.v1i1.20309Keywords:
Communicator, target, persuasion quality.Abstract
Suggestion through advice, religious proselytizing and semon for others are omitted. This is not merely because the suggestion is not true, it is also signed that there is people is bilief crisis toward communicator. The problem is located in the relationship between communicatorand target, who accept  the suggestion. Belief to some information is the beginning of attitude changes. Hence belief to the information atributes a persuasion quality. Communicator was not viewed by the target as individual that is apart from the target him/ her self, but also someone that has an association with the target. Cognitive approach described the target thinking toward who the comunicator is.
The study is aimed at understanding wether there is influence of similar elements between the communicators and the target toward persuation quality. The similarities include gender, Â tribe, Â and religion. Those similarities common self identies, usually are depicted by communicator's name. Metodologic practically, whether the information given by the communicator has similar element with the target him/ her self is more believable than from the communicator haring no element with the target.
Sheet that contains some information is give to 87 subjects. The are asked for giving sign to which information that nerds testing. Sixty two out of the subjects serve as experimental group, receive information sheet attributed with the name of the communicator. As the control, the other 25 subjects receive information from the communicator whose name is abscure. The result of this study shows that there is no significant defferences between the group (p 0. 144 > 0.05). This means the communicator and the target similarity does not significantly influence the belief in the information. While difference between information content quality, show very significant differences (p 0. 000 < 0.05). This means that the information content quality has the most influenciai in the information.
References
Baron, R. A. and Byrne, D. (1994), Social Psychology, Understanding Human Interaction, Allyn and Bacon, Boston.
Cacioppo, J.T. Petty R.E. and Morris, K. (1986), Central and peripheral routes to persuasion: an individual difference perspective, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1032- 1043.
DeBono, K.D. and Harnish, R. (1988), Source expertise, source attractiveness and the processing of persuasive information : a functional approach, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 541-546.
Myers, D. (1994), Exploring Social Psychology, McGraw-Hill Inc., New York.
____. (1999), Social Psychology, McGraw-Hill Inc., New York.
Petty, R.E. and Cacioppo, J.T. (1986), Issue Involvement Can Increase or Decrease Persuasion by Enhacing Message-Relevant Cognitive Resourses, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1915-1926.
Petty, R.E., Cacioppo, J.T. and Goldman, R. (1981), Personal Involvement as a Determinant of Argument-Based Persuasion, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 847-855.
Plaus, S. (1993), The Psychology of Judgment and Decision Making, McGraw Hill, New York.
Sears, O. D., Jonathan L.F., Anne P. (1994), Psikologi Sosial Erlangga, Jakarta.
Wilder, D.A. (1990), Some Determinants of the Persuasive Power of In Groups and Out Groups Organization of Information and Attribution of Independence, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1202-1213.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic License.
